Literature DB >> 16980531

The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities.

P M Grant1, C G Ryan, W W Tigbe, M H Granat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of physical activity patterns can be used to identify sedentary behaviour and may facilitate interventions aimed at reducing inactivity.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activPAL physical activity monitor as a measure of posture and motion in everyday activities using observational analysis as the criterion standard.
METHODS: Wearing three activPAL monitors, 10 healthy participants performed a range of randomly assigned everyday tasks incorporating walking, standing and sitting. Each trial was captured on a digital camera and the recordings were synchronised with the activPAL. The time spent in different postures was visually classified and this was compared with the activPAL output.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2,1) for interdevice reliability ranged from 0.79 to 0.99. Using the Bland and Altman method, the mean percentage difference between the activPAL monitor and observation for total time spent sitting was 0.19% (limits of agreement -0.68% to 1.06%) and for total time spent upright was -0.27% (limits of agreement -1.38% to 0.84%). The mean difference for total time spent standing was 1.4% (limits of agreement -6.2% to 9.1%) and for total time spent walking was -2.0% (limits of agreement -16.1% to 12.1%). A second-by-second analysis between observer and monitor found an overall agreement of 95.9%.
CONCLUSION: The activPAL activity monitor is a valid and reliable measure of posture and motion during everyday physical activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16980531      PMCID: PMC2577473          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  22 in total

1.  Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation.

Authors:  K Aminian; P Robert; E E Buchser; B Rutschmann; D Hayoz; M Depairon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  A description of an accelerometer-based mobility monitoring technique.

Authors:  G M Lyons; K M Culhane; D Hilton; P A Grace; D Lyons
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: a validation study.

Authors:  J B Bussmann; J H Tulen; E C van Herel; H J Stam
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses.

Authors:  G Rankin; M Stokes
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  Ambulatory accelerometry to quantify motor behaviour in patients after failed back surgery: a validation study.

Authors:  J B Bussmann; Y M van de Laar; M P Neeleman; H J Stam
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  A novel tool to quantify physical activities: ambulatory accelerometry in psychopharmacology.

Authors:  J H Tulen; H B Bussmann; H G van Steenis; L Pepplinkhuizen; A J Man in 't Veld
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.153

8.  Validity and reliability of measurements obtained with an "activity monitor" in people with and without a transtibial amputation.

Authors:  H B Bussmann; P J Reuvekamp; P H Veltink; W L Martens; H J Stam
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-09

9.  Interindividual variation in posture allocation: possible role in human obesity.

Authors:  James A Levine; Lorraine M Lanningham-Foster; Shelly K McCrady; Alisa C Krizan; Leslie R Olson; Paul H Kane; Michael D Jensen; Matthew M Clark
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Interventions for promoting physical activity.

Authors:  M Hillsdon; C Foster; M Thorogood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25
View more
  231 in total

1.  Validity of two wearable monitors to estimate breaks from sedentary time.

Authors:  Kate Lyden; Sarah L Kozey Keadle; John W Staudenmayer; Patty S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Exploring physical activity level in patients with thoracic cancer: implications for use as an outcome measure.

Authors:  Matthew Maddocks; Andrew Wilcock
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Compliance with physical activity guidelines in a group of UK-based postal workers using an objective monitoring technique.

Authors:  Sebastien F M Chastin; Philippa M Dall; William W Tigbe; Margaret P Grant; Cormac G Ryan; Danny Rafferty; Malcolm H Granat
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Geriatric rehabilitation after hip fracture. Role of body-fixed sensor measurements of physical activity.

Authors:  P Benzinger; U Lindemann; C Becker; K Aminian; M Jamour; S E Flick
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  Editor's Choice: Dual-process model of older adults' sedentary behavior: an ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Jaclyn P Maher; Genevieve F Dunton
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2019-09-24

7.  Physical activity level as an outcome measure for use in cancer cachexia trials: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Matthew Maddocks; Anthony Byrne; Colin D Johnson; Richard H Wilson; Kenneth C H Fearon; Andrew Wilcock
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Interrupting prolonged sitting in type 2 diabetes: nocturnal persistence of improved glycaemic control.

Authors:  Paddy C Dempsey; Jennifer M Blankenship; Robyn N Larsen; Julian W Sacre; Parneet Sethi; Nora E Straznicky; Neale D Cohen; Ester Cerin; Gavin W Lambert; Neville Owen; Bronwyn A Kingwell; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Validity of using tri-axial accelerometers to measure human movement - Part II: Step counts at a wide range of gait velocities.

Authors:  Emma Fortune; Vipul Lugade; Melissa Morrow; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Do walking strategies to increase physical activity reduce reported sitting in workplaces: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Nicholas D Gilson; Anna Puig-Ribera; Jim McKenna; Wendy J Brown; Nicola W Burton; Carlton B Cooke
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.