Literature DB >> 29199642

Signal processing methods for reducing artifacts in microelectrode brain recordings caused by functional electrical stimulation.

D Young1, F Willett, W D Memberg, B Murphy, B Walter, J Sweet, J Miller, L R Hochberg, R F Kirsch, A B Ajiboye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a promising technology for restoring movement to paralyzed limbs. Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) have enabled intuitive control over virtual and robotic movements, and more recently over upper extremity FES neuroprostheses. However, electrical stimulation of muscles creates artifacts in intracortical microelectrode recordings that could degrade iBCI performance. Here, we investigate methods for reducing the cortically recorded artifacts that result from peripheral electrical stimulation. APPROACH: One participant in the BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial had two intracortical microelectrode arrays placed in the motor cortex, and thirty-six stimulating intramuscular electrodes placed in the muscles of the contralateral limb. We characterized intracortically recorded electrical artifacts during both intramuscular and surface stimulation. We compared the performance of three artifact reduction methods: blanking, common average reference (CAR) and linear regression reference (LRR), which creates channel-specific reference signals, composed of weighted sums of other channels. MAIN
RESULTS: Electrical artifacts resulting from surface stimulation were 175  ×  larger than baseline neural recordings (which were 110 µV peak-to-peak), while intramuscular stimulation artifacts were only 4  ×  larger. The artifact waveforms were highly consistent across electrodes within each array. Application of LRR reduced artifact magnitudes to less than 10 µV and largely preserved the original neural feature values used for decoding. Unmitigated stimulation artifacts decreased iBCI decoding performance, but performance was almost completely recovered using LRR, which outperformed CAR and blanking and extracted useful neural information during stimulation artifact periods. SIGNIFICANCE: The LRR method was effective at reducing electrical artifacts resulting from both intramuscular and surface FES, and almost completely restored iBCI decoding performance (>90% recovery for surface stimulation and full recovery for intramuscular stimulation). The results demonstrate that FES-induced artifacts can be easily mitigated in FES  +  iBCI systems by using LRR for artifact reduction, and suggest that the LRR method may also be useful in other noise reduction applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29199642      PMCID: PMC5818316          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa9ee8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  34 in total

1.  A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Takao Hashimoto; Christopher M Elder; Jerrold L Vitek
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Detection and removal of stimulation artifacts in electroencephalogram recordings.

Authors:  Ulrich Hoffmann; Woosang Cho; Ander Ramos-Murguialday; Thierry Keller
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

3.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication.

Authors:  D J McFarland; L M McCane; S V David; J R Wolpaw
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09

5.  High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Paul Nuyujukian; Christine H Blabe; Brittany L Sorice; Jad Saab; Francis R Willett; Leigh R Hochberg; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  An electronic stimulus artifact suppressor.

Authors:  J A Freeman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-08

7.  Neural Point-and-Click Communication by a Person With Incomplete Locked-In Syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; Sergey D Stavisky; John D Simeral; Katherine Newell; Erin M Oakley; Sydney S Cash; Gerhard Friehs; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Recording evoked potentials during deep brain stimulation: development and validation of instrumentation to suppress the stimulus artefact.

Authors:  A R Kent; W M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia.

Authors:  Chad E Bouton; Ammar Shaikhouni; Nicholas V Annetta; Marcia A Bockbrader; David A Friedenberg; Dylan M Nielson; Gaurav Sharma; Per B Sederberg; Bradley C Glenn; W Jerry Mysiw; Austin G Morgan; Milind Deogaonkar; Ali R Rezai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Coupling BCI and cortical stimulation for brain-state-dependent stimulation: methods for spectral estimation in the presence of stimulation after-effects.

Authors:  Armin Walter; Ander Ramos Murguialday; Martin Spüler; Georgios Naros; Maria Teresa Leão; Alireza Gharabaghi; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Niels Birbaumer; Martin Bogdan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Characterizing the short-latency evoked response to intracortical microstimulation across a multi-electrode array.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Juliet Heye; Karthik Kumaravelu; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev; Warren M Grill; Sliman Bensmaia; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Decoding spoken English from intracortical electrode arrays in dorsal precentral gyrus.

Authors:  Guy H Wilson; Sergey D Stavisky; Francis R Willett; Donald T Avansino; Jessica N Kelemen; Leigh R Hochberg; Jaimie M Henderson; Shaul Druckmann; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Why brain-controlled neuroprosthetics matter: mechanisms underlying electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Cesar Marquez-Chin; Kei Masani; Masayuki Hirata; Taishin Nomura; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.