Literature DB >> 29199368

Testing ZnO nanoparticle ecotoxicity: linking time variable exposure to effects on different marine model organisms.

Simona Schiavo1, Maria Oliviero1, Jiji Li1, Sonia Manzo2.   

Abstract

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are increasingly used in several personal care products, with high potential to be released directly into marine environment with consequent adverse impact on marine biota. This paper aimed to compare the ecotoxicological effect of ZnO NPs (< 100 nm) towards three marine organisms widely used in toxicity assessment: an algal species (Dunaliella tertiolecta), a bioluminescent bacterium (Vibrio fischeri), and a crustacean (Artemia salina). Bulk ZnO (ZnO bulk, 200 nm) and ionic zinc were also investigated for understanding the role of size and of ionic release in the ZnO toxic action. To this aim, different ecotoxicological tests were used: the inhibition of bioluminescence with V. fischeri at three exposure times (5, 15, and 30 min); the D. tertiolecta growth inhibition at 24, 48, and 72 h; the A. salina mortality at 24-96 h, and A. salina mortality and body growth each 3 days along chronic exposure (14 days). For all selected species, ZnO NPs toxicity was strictly dependent on the exposure time and different sensitivities were recorded: ZnO NPs were more toxic towards algae (EC50 2.2 mg Zn/L) but relatively less toxic towards bacteria (EC50 17 mg Zn/L) and crustaceans (EC50 96 h 58 mg Zn/L). During the 14-day chronic exposure of A. salina, ZnO NPs had a significant inhibition of vitality and body length (EC5014d 0.02 mg Zn/L), while the effect of ZnSO4 was not statistically different from the control. ZnO NP toxicity was related to zinc ions and to interactions of particle/aggregates with target organisms and therefore to NP behavior in the testing matrix and to the different testing time exposures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute/chronic exposure; Artemia salina; Dunaliella tertiolecta; Metal oxide nanoparticles; Time-varying exposure; Vibrio fischeri

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29199368     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0815-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  35 in total

1.  A general best-fit method for concentration-response curves and the estimation of low-effect concentrations.

Authors:  M Scholze; W Boedeker; M Faust; T Backhaus; R Altenburger; L H Grimme
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Accumulation and toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in a soft-sediment estuarine amphipod.

Authors:  Shannon K Hanna; Robert J Miller; Dongxu Zhou; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Toxicity and accumulation of Cu and ZnO nanoparticles in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Yinlong Xiao; Martina G Vijver; Guangchao Chen; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Copper oxide and zinc oxide nanomaterials act as inhibitors of multidrug resistance transport in sea urchin embryos: their role as chemosensitizers.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Cristina Torres-Duarte; Bryan J Cole; Gary N Cherr
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Comparative evaluation of impact of Zn and ZnO nanoparticles on brine shrimp (Artemia salina) larvae: effects of particle size and solubility on toxicity.

Authors:  Mehmet Ates; James Daniels; Zikri Arslan; Ibrahim O Farah; Hilsamar Félix Rivera
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.238

6.  Different sizes of ZnO diversely affected the cytogenesis of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus.

Authors:  Maria Oliviero; Simona Schiavo; Gabriella Rametta; Maria Lucia Miglietta; Sonia Manzo
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Metal oxide nanomaterials in seawater: linking physicochemical characteristics with biological response in sea urchin development.

Authors:  Elise A Fairbairn; Arturo A Keller; Lutz Mädler; Dongxu Zhou; Suman Pokhrel; Gary N Cherr
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  TiO2 nanoparticles in the marine environment: Physical effects responsible for the toxicity on algae Phaeodactylum tricornutum.

Authors:  Yixiang Wang; Xiaoshan Zhu; Yongmin Lao; Xiaohui Lv; Yi Tao; Boming Huang; Jiangxin Wang; Jin Zhou; Zhonghua Cai
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus.

Authors:  Margit Heinlaan; Angela Ivask; Irina Blinova; Henri-Charles Dubourguier; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Toxic effects of ZnO nanoparticles towards marine algae Dunaliella tertiolecta.

Authors:  Sonia Manzo; Maria Lucia Miglietta; Gabriella Rametta; Silvia Buono; Girolamo Di Francia
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  4 in total

1.  The impact of morphology and size of zinc oxide nanoparticles on its toxicity to the freshwater microalga, Raphidocelis subcapitata.

Authors:  Mahya Samei; Mohammad-Hossein Sarrafzadeh; Mohammad Ali Faramarzi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Nanoparticles: An Experimental Study of Zinc Nanoparticles Toxicity on Marine Crustaceans. General Overview on the Health Implications in Humans.

Authors:  Luigi Vimercati; Domenica Cavone; Antonio Caputi; Luigi De Maria; Michele Tria; Ermelinda Prato; Giovanni Maria Ferri
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21

3.  Mechanism of nanotoxicity in Chlorella vulgaris exposed to zinc and iron oxide.

Authors:  Pallavi Saxena; Vinod Saharan; Prabhat Kumar Baroliya; Vinod Singh Gour; Manoj Kumar Rai
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  Conformable Nanowire-in-Nanofiber Hybrids for Low-Threshold Optical Gain in the Ultraviolet.

Authors:  Alberto Portone; Rocio Borrego-Varillas; Lucia Ganzer; Riccardo Di Corato; Antonio Qualtieri; Luana Persano; Andrea Camposeo; Giulio Cerullo; Dario Pisignano
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 15.881

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.