Literature DB >> 18194809

Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus.

Margit Heinlaan1, Angela Ivask, Irina Blinova, Henri-Charles Dubourguier, Anne Kahru.   

Abstract

As the production of nanoparticles of ZnO, TiO2 and CuO is increasing, their (eco)toxicity to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus was studied with a special emphasis on product formulations (nano or bulk oxides) and solubilization of particles. Our innovative approach based on the combination of traditional ecotoxicology methods and metal-specific recombinant biosensors allowed to clearly differentiate the toxic effects of metal oxides per se and solubilized metal ions. Suspensions of nano and bulk TiO2 were not toxic even at 20 g l(-1). All Zn formulations were very toxic: L(E)C50 (mg l(-1)) for bulk ZnO, nanoZnO and ZnSO4.7H2O: 1.8, 1.9, 1.1 (V. fischeri); 8.8, 3.2, 6.1 (D. magna) and 0.24, 0.18, 0.98 (T. platyurus), respectively. The toxicity was due to solubilized Zn ions as proved with recombinant Zn-sensor bacteria. Differently from Zn compounds, Cu compounds had different toxicities: L(E)C50 (mg l(-1)) for bulk CuO, nano CuO and CuSO4: 3811, 79, 1.6 (V. fischeri), 165, 3.2, 0,17 (D. magna) and 95, 2.1, 0.11 (T. platyurus), respectively. Cu-sensor bacteria showed that toxicity to V. fischeri and T. platyurus was largely explained by soluble Cu ions. However, for Daphnia magna, nano and bulk CuO proved less bioavailable than for bacterial Cu-sensor. This is the first evaluation of ZnO, CuO and TiO2 toxicity to V. fischeri and T. platyurus. For nano ZnO and nano CuO this is also a first study for D. magna.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18194809     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  171 in total

1.  Toxicity and genotoxicity of organic and inorganic nanoparticles to the bacteria Vibrio fischeri and Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  I Lopes; R Ribeiro; F E Antunes; T A P Rocha-Santos; M G Rasteiro; A M V M Soares; F Gonçalves; R Pereira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Assessing the acute hazards of zinc oxide nanomaterials to Lumbriculus variegatus.

Authors:  Shona O'Rourke; Vicki Stone; Björn Stolpe; Teresa F Fernandes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Size controlled ultrafine CeO2 nanoparticles produced by the microwave assisted route and their antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  Waleed M Al-Shawafi; Numan Salah; Ahmed Alshahrie; Youssri M Ahmed; Said S Moselhy; Ahmed H Hammad; Mohammad Asif Hussain; Adnan Memic
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Does the exposure mode to ENPs influence their toxicity to aquatic species? A case study with TiO2 nanoparticles and Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Beatrice Salieri; Andrea Pasteris; Jonas Baumann; Serena Righi; Jan Köser; Rosaria D'Amato; Benedetta Mazzesi; Juliane Filser
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Alterations of intestinal serotonin following nanoparticle exposure in embryonic zebrafish.

Authors:  Rıfat Emrah Ozel; Kenneth N Wallace; Silvana Andreescu
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2014-02-01

6.  Copper status of exposed microorganisms influences susceptibility to metallic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Vincent C Reyes; Melissa R Spitzmiller; Anne Hong-Hermesdorf; Janette Kropat; Robert D Damoiseaux; Sabeeha S Merchant; Shaily Mahendra
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Photocatalytic oxidation of six endocrine disruptor chemicals in wastewater using ZnO at pilot plant scale under natural sunlight.

Authors:  Nuria Vela; May Calín; María J Yáñez-Gascón; Isabel Garrido; Gabriel Pérez-Lucas; José Fenoll; Simón Navarro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Toxicity of engineered nanoparticles in the environment.

Authors:  Melissa A Maurer-Jones; Ian L Gunsolus; Catherine J Murphy; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Effects of subchronic exposure to zinc nanoparticles on tissue accumulation, serum biochemistry, and histopathological changes in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).

Authors:  Hasan Kaya; Müge Duysak; Mehmet Akbulut; Sevdan Yılmaz; Mert Gürkan; Zikri Arslan; Veysel Demir; Mehmet Ateş
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.119

10.  Antimicrobial activities of commercial nanoparticles against an environmental soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440.

Authors:  Priyanka Gajjar; Brian Pettee; David W Britt; Wenjie Huang; William P Johnson; Anne J Anderson
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.