Enrico Ammirati1, Giacomo Veronese2,3, Manlio Cipriani2, Francesco Moroni4, Andrea Garascia2, Michela Brambatti5, Eric D Adler5, Maria Frigerio2. 1. "De Gasperis" Cardio Center and Transplant Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy. enrico.ammirati@ospedaleniguarda.it. 2. "De Gasperis" Cardio Center and Transplant Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy. 3. School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy. 4. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and Hospital, Milan, Italy. 5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the clinical features of acute myocarditis, including its fulminant presentation, and present a pragmatic approach to the diagnosis and treatment, considering indications of American and European Scientific Statements and recent data derived by large contemporary registries. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients presenting with acute uncomplicated myocarditis (i.e., without left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or ventricular arrhythmias) have a favorable short- and long-term prognosis: these findings do not support the indication to endomyocardial biopsy in this clinical scenario. Conversely, patients with complicated presentations, especially those with fulminant myocarditis, require an aggressive and comprehensive management, including endomyocardial biopsy and availability of advanced therapies for circulatory support. Although several immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies have been studied and are actually prescribed in the real-world practice, their effectiveness has not been clearly demonstrated. Patients with specific histological subtypes of acute myocarditis (i.e., giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis) or those affected by sarcoidosis or systemic autoimmune disorders seem to benefit most from immunosuppression. On the other hand, no clear evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive agents in patients with lymphocytic acute myocarditis, even though small series suggest a potential benefit. Acute myocarditis is a heterogeneous condition with distinct pathophysiological pathways. Further research is mandatory to identify factors and mechanisms that may trigger/maintain or counteract/repair the myocardial damage, in order to provide a rational for future evidence-based treatment of patients affected by this condition.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the clinical features of acute myocarditis, including its fulminant presentation, and present a pragmatic approach to the diagnosis and treatment, considering indications of American and European Scientific Statements and recent data derived by large contemporary registries. RECENT FINDINGS:Patients presenting with acute uncomplicated myocarditis (i.e., without left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or ventricular arrhythmias) have a favorable short- and long-term prognosis: these findings do not support the indication to endomyocardial biopsy in this clinical scenario. Conversely, patients with complicated presentations, especially those with fulminant myocarditis, require an aggressive and comprehensive management, including endomyocardial biopsy and availability of advanced therapies for circulatory support. Although several immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies have been studied and are actually prescribed in the real-world practice, their effectiveness has not been clearly demonstrated. Patients with specific histological subtypes of acute myocarditis (i.e., giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis) or those affected by sarcoidosis or systemic autoimmune disorders seem to benefit most from immunosuppression. On the other hand, no clear evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive agents in patients with lymphocytic acute myocarditis, even though small series suggest a potential benefit. Acute myocarditis is a heterogeneous condition with distinct pathophysiological pathways. Further research is mandatory to identify factors and mechanisms that may trigger/maintain or counteract/repair the myocardial damage, in order to provide a rational for future evidence-based treatment of patients affected by this condition.
Authors: R Wojnicz; E Nowalany-Kozielska; C Wojciechowska; G Glanowska; P Wilczewski; T Niklewski; M Zembala; L Polonski; M M Rozek; J Wodniecki Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-07-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Philipp Lurz; Ingo Eitel; Julia Adam; Julia Steiner; Matthias Grothoff; Steffen Desch; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Mahdi Sareban; Christian Luecke; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Gerhard Schuler; Matthias Gutberlet; Holger Thiele Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-05
Authors: Biykem Bozkurt; Monica Colvin; Jennifer Cook; Leslie T Cooper; Anita Deswal; Gregg C Fonarow; Gary S Francis; Daniel Lenihan; Eldrin F Lewis; Dennis M McNamara; Elfriede Pahl; Ramachandran S Vasan; Kumudha Ramasubbu; Kismet Rasmusson; Jeffrey A Towbin; Clyde Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: G M Felker; J P Boehmer; R H Hruban; G M Hutchins; E K Kasper; K L Baughman; J M Hare Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J W Mason; J B O'Connell; A Herskowitz; N R Rose; B M McManus; M E Billingham; T E Moon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-08-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yuji Okura; G William Dec; Joshua M Hare; Makoto Kodama; Gerald J Berry; Henry D Tazelaar; Kent R Bailey; Leslie T Cooper Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Tomasz K Urbanowicz; Hanna Baszyńska-Wachowiak; Anna Olasińska-Wiśniewska; Marcin Misterski; Sebastian Stefaniak; Marcin Ligowski; Marek Jemielity Journal: Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Date: 2020-07-20
Authors: Enrico Ammirati; Maria Frigerio; Leslie T Cooper; Paolo G Camici; Eric D Adler; Cristina Basso; David H Birnie; Michela Brambatti; Matthias G Friedrich; Karin Klingel; Jukka Lehtonen; Javid J Moslehi; Patrizia Pedrotti; Ornella E Rimoldi; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Carsten Tschöpe Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 8.790