Literature DB >> 29197019

[Quality indicators for pancreatic surgery : Scientific derivation and clinical relevance].

U F Wellner1, R Grützmann2, T Keck1, N Nüssler3, H E Witzigmann4, H-J Buhr5.   

Abstract

Quality indicators are by definition indirect measures of quality. The selection for the field of pancreatic surgery was based on the clinical relevance and controllability, scientific evidence and the practicability of data acquisition. In terms of outcome quality, hospital mortality, the composite endpoint MTL30 (mortality-transfer-length of stay), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grades 3b and 4) were chosen as being essential. With respect to structural quality, the presence of interventional radiology with constant availability was considered essential. To evaluate target values two strategies were used: a systematic literature search and evaluation of the current numbers from the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) StuDoQ|Pancreas registry for the years 2014-2016. The results are presented in the following consensus statement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital mortality; MTL30 (mortality-transfer-length of stay); Major complications; Outcome quality; Structure quality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29197019     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0564-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  36 in total

1.  Volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  G Alsfasser; H Leicht; C Günster; B M Rau; G Schillinger; E Klar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Effect of Hospital Volume on Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tatsuo Hata; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Masaharu Ishida; Takeshi Naitoh; Yu Katayose; Shinichi Egawa; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Minimum Caseload Requirements and In-hospital Mortality: Observational Study using Nationwide Hospital Discharge Data from 2006 to 2013].

Authors:  U Nimptsch; D Peschke; T Mansky
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  Quality assessment in pancreatic surgery: what might tomorrow require?

Authors:  Brian T Kalish; Charles M Vollmer; Tara S Kent; William H Nealon; Jennifer F Tseng; Mark P Callery
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  [MTL30 as surrogate parameter for quality of surgically treated diseases : Establishment based on the StuDoQ register of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery].

Authors:  A Wiegering; U Wellner; F Seyfried; J Hardt; C Klinger; H Buhr; S Post
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Systematic review of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Didier Roulin; Yannick Cerantola; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage in a high-volume center.

Authors:  Robert Grützmann; Felix Rückert; Nele Hippe-Davies; Marius Distler; Hans-Detlev Saeger
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Keith D Lillemoe; Mark S Talamonti; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707).

Authors:  Helmut Witzigmann; Markus K Diener; Stefan Kienkötter; Inga Rossion; Thomas Bruckner; Olaf Pridöhl; Olga Radulova-Mauersberger; Heike Lauer; Phillip Knebel; Alexis Ulrich; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage.

Authors:  George Van Buren; Mark Bloomston; Steven J Hughes; Jordan Winter; Stephen W Behrman; Nicholas J Zyromski; Charles Vollmer; Vic Velanovich; Taylor Riall; Peter Muscarella; Jose Trevino; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Kevin Behrns; E Christopher Ellison; Omar Barakat; Kyle A Perry; Jeffrey Drebin; Michael House; Sherif Abdel-Misih; Eric J Silberfein; Steven Goldin; Kimberly Brown; Somala Mohammed; Sally E Hodges; Amy McElhany; Mehdi Issazadeh; Eunji Jo; Qianxing Mo; William E Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Case load and quality indicators in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms].

Authors:  Y Carmen Ahmadzadeh; Th Schmitz-Rixen; D Böckler; R T Grundmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.