Literature DB >> 22088819

Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage in a high-volume center.

Robert Grützmann1, Felix Rückert, Nele Hippe-Davies, Marius Distler, Hans-Detlev Saeger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is observed infrequently after pancreatic surgery, it remains a serious complication with a high rate of mortality. Recently, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) issued a new definition for PPH. To evaluate and validate this new definition, we analyzed data retrospectively from our center.
METHODS: Data from 945 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery in our department between October 1993 and December 2009 were identified retrospectively from our prospective database with regard to the occurrences of PPH. We graded the hemorrhages recorded in our database according to the ISGPS consensus definition. We assessed the clinical course, morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospital stay for patients with grade B and C PPHs in comparison with patients who underwent pancreatic resections without hemorrhage.
RESULTS: Grade B PPH after pancreatic surgery occurred in 16 patients (1.7%), and grade C PPH occurred in 38 patients (4.0%). Mortality was significantly increased in PPH grades B and C compared with control patients (25.9% vs 2.0%; P < .001) and contributed to nearly one-half of the mortality in the present series. Morbidity was also increased in patients with grade B (76.5%) and C (94.6%) PPH compared with control patients (59.6%; P < .001). Grade B and C PPH correlated significantly with the incidence of grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula (14.8% vs 1.9%), grade C delayed gastric emptying (18.5% vs 4.0%), and wound infection (38.9% vs 13.5%) compared with control patients.
CONCLUSION: This is the first clinical evaluation of the ISGPS PPH definition. Our data indicate that the new definition correlates well with morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospital stay. The definition, therefore, seems suitable for clinical and scientific applications. Copyright Â
© 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22088819     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  34 in total

1.  Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.

Authors:  Irene Epelboym; Irmina Gawlas; James A Lee; Beth Schrope; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database.

Authors:  B Darnis; R Lebeau; X Chopin-Laly; M Adham
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Biondetti; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Anna Maria Ierardi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-04

Review 4.  Management of the right hepatic artery in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mehdi El Amrani; François-René Pruvot; Stéphanie Truant
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04

5.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage--incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1,000 pancreatic resections.

Authors:  U F Wellner; B Kulemann; H Lapshyn; J Hoeppner; O Sick; F Makowiec; D Bausch; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; T Keck
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  [Quality indicators for pancreatic surgery : Scientific derivation and clinical relevance].

Authors:  U F Wellner; R Grützmann; T Keck; N Nüssler; H E Witzigmann; H-J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.

Authors:  Adam Polonski; Jakob R Izbicki; Faik G Uzunoglu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Influence of Hospital Volume Effects and Minimum Caseload Requirements on Quality of Care in Pancreatic Surgery in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Krautz; Axel Denz; Georg F Weber; Robert Grützmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-30

9.  Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: does timing matter?

Authors:  Gyulnara G Kasumova; Mariam F Eskander; Tara S Kent; Sing Chau Ng; A James Moser; Muneeb Ahmed; Douglas K Pleskow; Mark P Callery; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Hepatic artery reinforcement after post pancreatectomy haemorrhage caused by pancreatitis.

Authors:  Aude Merdrignac; Damien Bergeat; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Marina Agus; Karim Boudjema; Laurent Sulpice; Bernard Meunier
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.