Literature DB >> 29194347

In Vivo and In Vitro Activities and ADME-Tox Profile of a Quinolizidine-Modified 4-Aminoquinoline: A Potent Anti-P. falciparum and Anti-P. vivax Blood-Stage Antimalarial.

Nicoletta Basilico1, Silvia Parapini2, Anna Sparatore3, Sergio Romeo4, Paola Misiano5, Livia Vivas6, Vanessa Yardley7, Simon L Croft8, Annette Habluetzel9, Leonardo Lucantoni10, Laurent Renia11, Bruce Russell12, Rossarin Suwanarusk13, Francois Nosten14,15, Giulio Dondio16, Chiara Bigogno17, Daniela Jabes18, Donatella Taramelli19.   

Abstract

Natural products are a prolific source for the identification of new biologically active compounds. In the present work, we studied the in vitro and in vivo anti<span class="Disease">malarial efficacy and ADME-Tox profile of a molecular hybrid (AM1) between 4-aminoquinoline and a quinolizidine moiety derived from lupinine (Lupinus luteus). The aim was to find a compound endowed with the target product profile-1 (TCP-1: molecules that clear asexual blood-stage parasitaemia), proposed by the Medicine for Malaria Venture to accomplish the goal of malaria elimination/eradication. AM1 displayed a very attractive profile in terms of both in vitro and in vivo activity. By using standard in vitro antimalarial assays, AM1 showed low nanomolar inhibitory activity against chloroquine-sensitive and resistant P. falciparum strains (range IC50 16-53 nM), matched with a high potency against P. vivax field isolates (Mean IC50 29 nM). Low toxicity and additivity with artemisinin derivatives were also demonstrated in vitro. High in vivo oral efficacy was observed in both P.berghei and P. yoelii mouse models with IC50 values comparable or better than those of chloroquine. The metabolic stability in different species and the pharmacokinetic profile in the mouse model makes AM1 a compound worth further investigation as a potential novel schizonticidal agent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4-aminoquinoline; P. falciparum; P. vivax; drug resistance; malaria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29194347      PMCID: PMC6149971          DOI: 10.3390/molecules22122102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

<span class="Disease">Malaria is an <span class="Disease">infectious disease caused by Plasmodium parasites; two species, P. falciparum and P. vivax, are responsible for more than 400,000 deaths/year worldwide. The majority of fatalities (90%), mostly children below the age of five and pregnant women, occur in Africa, and in particular in the sub-Saharan regions [1]. Increased funding and efforts to find new, effective treatments, together with improvements in the use of control tools (insecticide-treated nets and residual indoor spraying), succeeded in reducing <span class="Disease">malaria incidence by 41% between 2000 and 2015. Similarly, global malaria mortality decreased by 62% over the same years. However, the emergence of parasite resistance to the current combination therapies based on artemisinin derivatives (ACTs) may frustrate all these efforts [2,3,4,5]. Moreover, in some of the countries where P. falciparum has been eliminated (Central Asia, Argentina, Belize, Mexico, and large parts of China) there is growing evidence for an increase in morbidity and mortality due to P. vivax infection [6,7,8]. For these reasons, the discovery and development of new drugs active against different Plasmodium species remains a high priority. The <span class="Chemical">4-aminoquinoline class of drugs, represented by the classical antimalarial agent chloroquine (CQ), has been highly successful in the treatment of malaria for decades before resistance emerged and spread. Another member of the family, amodiaquine (AQ), is still used in ACT [9]. For their stability, bioavailability, and efficacy, quinoline-type drugs are extremely effective as blood-stage schizonticidal agents. However, their usage is hampered by the large diffusion of resistance of P. falciparum and P. vivax strains to CQ, and cross-resistance to AQ and mefloquine. In countries where CQ use was discontinued, studies have shown that, in the absence of drug pressure, CQ-resistant strains of P. falciparum have been replaced by CQ-sensitive isolates [10]. Therefore, the development of CQ analogues as multi-species antimalarial agents may still be valid and has been recently highlighted and reviewed [11,12]. Chemical modification of the side chain of <span class="Chemical">4-aminoquinolines, either in length or with the introduction of bulky basic groups, has been shown to overcome CQ resistance. Over the years, several compounds active also in CQ-resistant strains have been synthesized and some of them, including one from our group, reached pre-clinical testing [13,14,15]. Ferroquine and AQ 13, for example, are in advanced clinical phase II evaluation [16,17,18,19,20]. In order to eliminate <span class="Disease">malaria, the antimalarial target product profiles have been recently revised by the Medicine for Malaria Venture (MMV), highlighting the importance of developing compounds that will be able to target different parasite species and stages, maintaining a good ADME/PK profile which can be relevant for combination therapies [21]. A few years ago, we synthesized and studied a new series of <span class="Chemical">7-chloro-4-aminoquinolines characterized by the presence of a bulky quinolizidinyl or quinolizidinylalkyl side chain, the latter derived from the natural product (−)-lupinine, an alkaloid extracted from Lupinus luteus seeds [22]. Among them, 7-chloro-4-(N-lupinyl)aminoquinoline, named (−)-AM1, was selected for further physicochemical and biological characterization. The results indicated that the antiplasmodial activity of (−)-AM1 was likely due to inhibition of hemozoin formation. This was directly tested in a beta-hematin inhibitory assay in vitro, and it was substantiated by measuring the lipophilicity of (−)-AM1 [23]. In fact, (−)-AM1 is more lipophilic than chloroquine and thus able to accumulate at the interface between lipids and water where hemozoin formation is reported to occur [24]. The efficacy against CQ-resistant strains of P. falciparum could be ascribed to the ability of (−)-AM1 to block drug efflux by hydrophobic interactions with PfCRT, the transporter responsible for CQ resistance [23]. Due to the limited market supply of (−)-lupinine, the total synthesis of 7-chloro-4-(N-lupinyl)aminoquinoline, the most active compound of the series, was developed resulting in a racemic product called (±)-AM1 (Figure 1) [25].
Figure 1

Structure of investigated compounds: 7-chloro-N-(((1S,9aR)-octahydro-1H-quinolizin-1-yl)methyl)quinolin-4-amine (−)-AM1; 7-chloro-N-(((1R,9aS)-octahydro-1H-quinolizin-1-yl)methyl)quinolin-4-amine (+)-AM1.

Both the racemate and its purified enantiomers showed potent anti<span class="Disease">malarial in vitro activity against both CQ-S (D10) and CQ-R (W-2) strains of P. falciparum, and a good therapeutic index [25]. In the present work, we extended the previous observations by completing in vivo efficacy studies of racemic AM1 and its purified enantiomers in two rodent <span class="Disease">malaria models (P. berghei and P. yoelii) with different susceptibilities to CQ, and activity studies against P. vivax clinical isolates. We also evaluated the ADME-Tox profiles in vivo and in vitro.

2. Results

2.1. In Vitro Antimalarial Activity against P. falciparum and P. vivax

Racemic AM1 and its purified enantiomers (Figure 1) showed an anti<span class="Disease">malarial activity in vitro in the low nanomolar range (IC50 = 16–53 nM) when tested against both CQ-S (D10) and CQ-R strains of P. falciparum (FCR1 and FCR3), including a multidrug-resistant parasite TM91C235 (isolated in Thailand) (Table 1). All the compounds had very low toxicity and an excellent selectivity index (SI > 1000) against human endothelial cells and fibroblasts, and mouse cell lines, as previously reported [25]. Furthermore, (±)-AM1 showed remarkable antimalarial activity against 10 different field isolates of P. vivax with potency about 3 times higher than that of CQ (Table 1, right column).
Table 1

In vitro antimalarial activities of the AM1 racemate and its enantiomers on P. falciparum laboratory strains and P. vivax field isolates.

CompoundsP. falciparum IC50 (nM) aP. vivax IC50 (nM) b
D10 c (CQ-S)W-2 c (CQ-R)TM91C235FCR1FCR3Field Isolates
(±)-AM116.1535.44---29.72
(−)-AM123.9853.6716.7432.8723.28-
(+)-AM117.4935.77----
CQ23.72437.62199.46181.93112.5686.66

a The assay was evaluated after 72 h incubation, using the parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) method, mean of 3 different experiments. b IC50 results from 10 field isolates from the Thai–Burmese Border. c Data already published in [25].

When tested in combination studies with <span class="Chemical">dihydroartemisinin (DHA) using D10 (CQ-S) and W-2 (CQ-R) parasites, the isobolograms showed that (−)-AM1 had additive activity with DHA (FIC < 2), with a non-significant trend toward antagonism (Figure 2A,B). The results are similar to those obtained with CQ (Figure 2C,D).
Figure 2

Isobologram analysis of the antimalarial activity of (−)-AM1 in combination with dihydroartemisinin (DHA) against D10 chloroquine-sensitive (CQ-S) (A) or W2 chloroquine-resistant (CQ-R) (B) P. falciparum strains. Combinations of DHA with chloroquine (CQ) are shown in (C,D). DHA fractional IC50 values were calculated by dividing the IC50 of DHA combined with (−)-AM1 or CQ, respectively, by the IC50 of DHA alone, and plotted on the horizontal axis. The corresponding fractional (−)-AM1 or CQ IC50 values were calculated by dividing each fixed concentration by the IC50 of the (−)-AM1 or CQ alone, and plotted on the vertical axis. An isobologram close to the diagonal indicates an additive effect. Curves significantly (>2) above or below the diagonal indicate antagonistic or synergistic effects, respectively.

2.2. In Vivo Oral Efficacy Studies

Racemic AM1, (−)-AM1, and <span class="Chemical">(+)-AM1 were tested for oral in vivo efficacy in the four-day mouse infection model against P. berghei ANKA [26] and P. yoelii. The data, expressed as ED50 and ED90 values, are reported in Table 2.
Table 2

Therapeutic efficacy of (±)-AM1, (−)-AM1, (+)-AM1, and chloroquine against P. berghei ANKA and P. yoelii infection in mice using the Standard four-day Test.

CompoundsP. berghei aP. yoelii a
ED50 (95% CI) (mg/kg)ED90 (95% CI) (mg/kg)ED50 (95% CI) (mg/kg)ED90 (95% CI) (mg/kg)
(±)-AM12.77 (1.26–4.29)12.58 (7.69–17.46)
(−)-AM12.05 (1.31–2.79)8.65 (7.06–10.23)1.55 (1.25–1.92)4.95 (3.08–7.94)
(+)-AM11.60 (1.08–2.11)2.03 (1.46–2.60)
Chloroquine1.12 (0.98–1.26)2.93 (2.64–3.22)<358.5 (5.38–6.42)

a CD1 mice were inoculated i.p. with 4 × 106 infected erythrocytes/mouse. Four drug doses of compounds, dissolved in standard suspending formula (SSV), were administered orally, once a day for four days, starting two hours post-infection. Percent parasitaemia was evaluated by microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained smears taken on day 4. ED50 and ED90 values were calculated by GraphPad Prism6. All animal work at The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) was conducted under licence (PPL70/8427) according to UK Home Office regulations: The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986.

All compounds showed very good oral efficacy, similar to that of CQ. The ED50 did not differ significantly between the two enantiomers, whereas the ED90 of <span class="Chemical">(+)-AM1 was lower than that of (−)-AM1 and the racemate, and identical to that of CQ. In the P. yoelii model, which is considered relatively CQ-resistant, the (−)-AM1 enantiomer maintained its antimalarial activity, while CQ had lower efficacy, as expected. The maximum tolerated dose, MTD, in CD1 mice treated with (−)-AM1 was greater than 100 mg/kg, i.p. No toxic clinical signs or mortality were noted up to this dose. Similar results were obtained using the compounds as free bases or as water soluble salts, confirming a therapeutic index greater than that observed for CQ (MTD 50 mg/kg i.p.).

2.3. In Vivo Transmission-Blocking and Prophylactic Effects

Having demonstrated a high in vivo oral efficacy against asexual blood-stages in the four-day test, we investigated the activity of the (−)-AM1 enantiomer on the transmission stages of the rodent <span class="Disease">malaria parasite P. berghei ANKA and Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. BALB/c mice, four days after infection with P. berghei, were treated orally with 50 mg/kg of (−)-AM1 and anesthetized and submitted to the bites of A. stephensi mosquitoes one hour later. After 10 days, a high proportion (86.4%) of mosquitoes infected with gametocytes from (−)-AM1-treated mice hosted oocysts on their midgut (CI95 81.4–103.6%). This was not different from control mosquito positivity (90%, CI95 80.6–99.4%). Similarly, there was not a significant difference in infection intensity, i.e., the number of oocysts per midgut, between mosquitoes infected with gametocytes from (−)-AM1-treated mice or controls: an average of 54.11 (CI95 39.77–68.45) and 39.17 (CI95 18.44–59.89) oocysts were found, respectively (Student’s t-test p = 0.24). When tested for prophylactic activity (see M&M for details), no significant differences in parasitaemia in (−)-AM1 treated <span class="Species">mice compared to control <span class="Species">mice were seen during the entire evaluation period (days 5–9 post-infection). It can be concluded that in the present model, (−)-AM1 does not show transmission-blocking or prophylactic activity.

2.4. Metabolic Stability and Biotransformation Studies in Rat, Mouse, and Human Microsomes

Preliminary experiments were then conducted to explore the ADME properties of these compounds. When evaluated in hepatic microsomes (Figure 3), racemic AM1 and its enantiomers showed high metabolic stability (greater than 50% remaining at 30 min) in both rat and <span class="Species">human species, comparable to that of CQ. On the contrary, in the mouse microsomes, all the compounds were moderately unstable (from 16 to 47% remaining at 30 min), with racemic AM1 and (+)-AM1 less stable than (−)-AM1. Standard reference compounds propranolol and 7-ethoxycoumarin were metabolized as expected [27].
Figure 3

Metabolic stability studies in mouse, rat, and human microsomes. Hepatic metabolic stability of the AM1 racemate and its enantiomers was determined in the microsomes of mouse, rat, and human species after 30 min incubation. 7-EC and propranolol were used as reference compounds. Results are expressed as Mean ± S.D., n = 2. Metabolic stability range values: >50: High; 10–50: Medium; <10: Low.

Biotransformation studies were performed only on (−)-AM1 in rat, <span class="Species">mouse, and <span class="Species">human hepatic microsomes in order to identify major metabolites and highlight possible differences among species. A representative chromatogram in the <span class="Species">mouse and the MS spectra are shown in Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials), while the proposed structures of metabolites in all the species, together with the retention times, are shown in Table 3. In the same table, the metabolites found in <span class="Species">mouse plasma after 50 mg/kg oral treatment are included. The retention times and [M + H]+ of the metabolites are the same for all three species.
Table 3

In vivo and in vitro main metabolites of (−)-AM1 and their proposed structures.

MH+ (rt, min)Proposed StructureMetabolic Products Detected In Vitro and In Vivo
In Vitro Microsomes (−)-AM1 1 μM In Vivo Plasma Levels after 50 mg/kg Oral Gavage
HumanRatMouseMouse
At 30 MinAt 120 Min
330 (6.1)++++
344 (5.9)+++ND
346 (4.7)++++

rt: retention time; ND: Not detectable.

The metabolites of (−)-AM1 ([M + H]+ = 330 at 6.1 min) were detected in all species but with different abundance, in agreement with the microsomal stability data. A mass [M + H]+ = 346 is observed at 4.7 min and 5.5 min (not present in <span class="Species">humans, data not shown) suggesting the presence of a hydroxylated or a protonated N-oxide metabolite, further confirmed by the fragment m/z = 329 (M-17). All the fragmentations detected are referred to the octahydroquinolizine portion of the parent compound (i.e., m/z 138 and 152, see Figure S2). Fragment m/z 182 is related to the hydroxylated octahydroquinolizine portion, which includes the methylenamino group. The fragment m/z 194 seems related to the chloroquinoline including the methylenamino bridge (Figure S3). Together, these data may suggest that the possible metabolite could be the N-oxide on the 4-amino-7-chloroquinoline. Fragment m/z 202.7, whose structure is not elucidated, can probably be referred to the chloroquinoline portion (see Figure S3). The concentration of the metabolite at 5.5 min (hydroxy or N-oxide) identified in rat and mouse microsome profiles was too small to be identified by a MS/MS analysis. The MS/MS spectra of a minor metabolite [M + H]+ = 344 at 5.9 min is shown in Figure S3 and it is compatible with a further oxidized product. The addition of 14 amu (atomic mass unit) to the parent can be attributed to the formation of a keto group. The parent [M + H]+ = 330 and the metabolites [M + H]+ = 346 and [M + H]+ = 344 were also detected in the <span class="Species">mouse plasma samples collected after oral treatment of CD1 <span class="Species">mice with 50 mg/kg of (−)-AM1 (Figure S4).

2.5. P450 and hERG Interaction

The potential for inhibition of the major <span class="Species">human P450 isoenzymes was also investigated. Racemic AM1 and the two enantiomers all showed a similar profile. At 3 µM, all compounds caused strong inhibition (>60%) of the CYP2D6 activity, with only a slight inhibition of the remaining four isoform activities (Table 4). It is worth mentioning that CYP2D6 is the only P450 isoenzyme which is also inhibited by CQ (Table 4) and confirmed in drug–drug interaction studies in humans [28].
Table 4

Comparative P450 inhibition potential of racemic AM1, its enantiomers, and chloroquine.

CompoundsP450 Interaction—Gentest Kit
CYP1A2CYP2C9CYP2C19CYP2D6CYP3A4
CEC aMFCCECAMMCBFC
Mean % Inhibition at 3 µM b
(±)-AM1<55.7 ± 0.26.0 ± 1.661.4 ± 2.011.6 ± 0.4
(+)-AM18.3 ± 0.811.1 ± 0.59.0 ± 1.162.2 ± 1.014.3 ± 1.9
(−)-AM1<5<55.0 ± 1.374.4 ± 3.58.4 ± 0.8
CQ <5<5<520.4 ± 1.16.8 ± 1.7

a Substrates: CEC: 3-Cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin; MFC: 7-Methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin; AMMC: 3-[2(N,Ndiethyl-N-methylamino)ethyl]-7-methoxy-4-methylcoumarin; BFC: 7-Benzyloxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)-coumarin. b Results are expressed as Mean ± S.D., n = 2; <5% inhibition is considered no effect.

The <span class="Chemical">4-aminoquinoline class of molecules is associated with potential cardiovascular side effects. Preliminary experiments of hERG binding indicated that (±)-AM1 and (−)-AM1 inhibit hERG with a Ki in the range of 0.5–0.8 µM, whilst chloroquine in the same experiments had a Ki of 2.2 µM. Electrophysiological functional assays will be required to further exclude this liability.

2.6. Pharmacokinetics

Table 5 reports the kinetic parameters evaluated after oral administration 10 mg/kg of the <span class="Chemical">AM1 racemate and its enantiomers to CD1 <span class="Species">mice. No significant differences in maximal plasma concentration achieved among the racemate or its enantiomers were observed. Cmax was about 0.10 μM for all compounds and the AUC 20 min·µM after oral administration of 10 mg/kg.
Table 5

Pharmacokinetic parameters of the AM1 racemate and its enantiomers.

Parameters a(±)-AM1(+)-AM1(−)-AM1
10 mg/kg
Cmax (µM)0.09960.1080.084
Cmax (ng/mL)32.7835.4827.60
Tmax (min)3012015
MRT last (min)196162200
AUC last (min·µM)19.522.918.8
AUC last (min·ng/mL)642175516179

a Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by the non-compartmental analysis WinNonlin 5.1, linear trapezoidal, uniform weight. The following parameters were calculated: Cmax (maximum plasma concentration), Tmax (time take to reach Cmax), MRT (mean residence time), AUC (area under the curve). In vivo PK experiments were performed with male CD-1 mice orally-treated by a single dose (10 mg/kg) of the AM1 racemate and single enantiomers, each dissolved in SSV. Blood samples were collected at eight selected time-points (15, 30, and 60 min; 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h) under ethyl ether anaesthesia, and plasma samples analyzed by LC/MS/MS.

The (−)-AM1 enantiomer was also orally injected to the <span class="Species">mice at three increasing doses (10, 25, and 50 mg/kg) and dose proportionality was displayed, together with a parallel kinetic of elimination of the three treatments, independently from the given dose (Figure S5).

3. Discussion

Historically, the <span class="Chemical">4-aminoquinolines are a very successful chemical class of antimalarials, which includes chloroquine and amodiaquine, still clinically used against P. vivax infection or in combination therapy against P. falciparum. In addition to their direct antiparasitic activity, the advantages of most of the 4-aminoquinolines are stability, high bioavailability, favorable PK/PD properties after oral administration, and low cost. For these reasons, although the emergence and spread of resistant P. falciparum strains significantly affected the use of chloroquine as monotherapy, research on a new generation of 4-aminoquinolines effective against multiresistant P. falciparum strains never stopped and novel compounds are presently in development. This is the case for <span class="Chemical">ferroquine and for AQ-13, in which a ferrocenyl moiety or a short diethylaminopropyl group replaced the side chain of chloroquine, respectively [16,29,30]. Both compounds successfully completed phase I studies [19,20] in human volunteers and in asymptomatic patients, and are presently under phase II efficacy studies, either alone or in combination (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01614964, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02497612). In both cases, the ability to overcome CQ resistance has been attributed to the modification of the lateral side chain of the <span class="Chemical">4-aminoquinoline ring, with the introduction of the ferrocene moiety as in ferroquine, or by reducing its length as in AQ13. Similarly, the compound AM1, described in this paper, was obtained by the introduction of a bulky, basic, and lipophilic quinolizidine ring (N-lupinyl) in the lateral chain of a 7-chloro-4-aminoquinoline [22], leading to a compound more lipophilic than CQ (AM1 LogD7.4 = 2.26 vs. CQ LogD7.4 = 0.90) [23]. Differently from the semisynthetic product which used (−)-lupinine as starting material, the total synthesis of AM1 lead to the formation of a racemate, which was then tested for antimalarial activity and toxicity in vitro together with the isolated enantiomers. The total synthesis of (±)-AM1 is cheap and straightforward, and can be accomplished in four steps using commercially available material [25]. The AM1 enantiomers displayed in vitro activity similar to the racemate, which supports further studies on the in vivo efficacy of these compounds and on the analysis of their pharmacokinetic and ADME/tox properties. Here, we report the activity of (±)-AM1 and its enantiomers in the low nanomolar range documented against laboratory <span class="Chemical">chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum strains, as well as the multidrug resistant strain TM91C235 strain from Thailand. In combination studies with DHA, (−)-AM1 displayed an additive effect similar to that obtained with CQ and DHA in combination. Therefore, the profile of the compound appears good in terms of possible administration against CQ-resistant strains and in combination with artemisinin. Moreover, (±)-AM1 displayed an inhibitory activity three-fold higher than <span class="Chemical">chloroquine against ten field isolates of P. vivax, an infection that accounts for approximately 4% of malaria cases worldwide, 41% of which occur outside Africa [1]. The WHO’s recommendation for the treatment of P. vivax infections is chloroquine, in non-chloroquine resistant areas, or ACT. However, in areas where chloroquine-resistant P. vivax infections have been identified, ACT should be the preferred choice. All ACTs, except the artesunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) combination, are demonstrated to be effective against the blood-stage infections of P. vivax. The in vitro and in vivo data reported for (±)-AM1 support its possible development against P. vivax, as well. The <span class="Chemical">AM1 racemate and its enantiomers were orally active at suitable doses in the classical in vivo four-day test in <span class="Species">mice as schizonticidal agents, with no significant differences in potency among (±)-AM1 and its enantiomers. They were inactive against the parasite transmission stages in the P. berghei/A. stephensi model. These results are consistent with previous data on this class of drugs [31]. However, for other 4-aminoquinolines recently synthesized (TDR58445 and TDR58446), a reduction of activity in both early and late gametocytes stages has been described [32], although at a relatively higher concentration (1 µM), compared to the activity on asexual stages. In terms of in vitro metabolic stability and interference with the <span class="Gene">P450 enzymes, racemic AM1 and its enantiomers did not differ significantly from chloroquine, used as reference drug. Similarly, the binding assay to hERG indicated that these molecules may share a potential liability for cardiovascular side effects with the quinoline antimalarials, including chloroquine and piperaquine, currently recommended by WHO for malaria therapy [33]. In the case of future developments, more stringent methods of analysis will be necessary. PK studies in animals were performed by oral gavage according to the target product profile for an anti<span class="Disease">malarial drug. The need for a complex formulation (SSV) was dictated by the poor solubility of the free bases, which could also have an impact on total drug disposition. This information is of relevance in respect to the in vivo efficacy data. In fact, all efficacy experiments have been performed with the compounds prepared as free bases, suggesting that the in vivo data obtained so far could underestimate the potential of the test compound as anti<span class="Disease">malarial. The introduction of a bulky <span class="Chemical">bicyclic tertiary amine in place of the diethylaminoalkyl chain typical of CQ and AQ13 changed the metabolic profile, thus N-dealkylation is not the preferred metabolic pathway. This aspect could be important because it has been demonstrated that the major CQ metabolites, desethylchloroquine (DEC) and, overall, bisdesethylchloroquine (bisDEC), are less active than the parent compound on CQ-resistant strains of P. falciparum [34]. Similarly to CQ, in vivo studies on AQ13 metabolites showed that its N-deethylation led to specific changes in lipophilicity and increased the cross-resistance of this compound even more than that of CQ [35]. The main AM1 metabolite seems to be an N-oxide on the amino methylene bridge. In terms of metabolic stability, this difference does not increase the half-life of AM1 compared to CQ, but could change the in vitro antimalarial profile. It remains to be elucidated how the in vivo antimalarial activity of AM1 is influenced by these metabolites. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the <span class="Chemical">4-aminoquinoline compounds remain of high interest as anti<span class="Disease">malarial agents, and AM1 in particular displays a very attractive profile in terms of in vitro and in vivo activity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Compounds

Racemic AM1 and its enantiomers (Figure 1) were synthesized as previously described [25,36]. <span class="Chemical">Chloroquine and all the other reagents, unless indicated, were purchased from Sigma (Sigma Italia, Milan, Italy).

4.2. Cultures of P. falciparum and In Vitro Chemosensitivity Assays

The strains D10 and 3D7 (<span class="Chemical">CQ-Sensitive), and W-2, FCR1, FCR3 (CQ-Resistant), and TM91C235 (multidrug-resistant) of P. falciparum were cultured in vitro as described by Trager and Jensen with minor modifications [37]. Briefly, parasites were maintained at 5% hematocrit (human type A+ red blood cells) in RPMI 1640 (EuroClone, Celbio, Pero, Italy) medium with the addition of 10% heat-inactivated human serum, 20 mM Hepes, and 2 mM glutamine (EuroClone). The cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a standard gas mixture consisting of 1–3% O2, 5% CO2, and 92–94% N2. Compounds were dissolved in either water or DMSO and then diluted with medium to achieve the required concentrations (final DMSO concentration <1%, which is non-toxic to the parasite). Asynchronous cultures of P. falciparum with parasitaemia of 1–1.5% and 1% final hematocrit were aliquoted into 96-well flat-bottom microplates (COSTAR) with serial dilutions of test compounds, and incubated for 72 h at 37 °C. Parasite growth was determined spectrophotometrically (OD650) by measuring the activity of the parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) according to a modified version of the method of Makler, in control and drug-treated cultures [38]. The antimalarial activity is expressed as 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50); each IC50 value is the mean and standard deviation of at least three separate experiments performed in duplicate [22]. The anti<span class="Disease">malarial activity of (−)-AM1 was assayed in combination with dihydroartemisinin (DHA) against W-2 (CQ-R) or D10 (CQ-S) strains of P. falciparum by potentiation tests as previously described [39]. CQ was used as a control. Isobolograms were constructed by plotting a pair of fractional IC50 values for each combination of (−)-AM1 or CQ with DHA [40]. An isobologram close to the diagonal indicates an additive effect. Curves significantly (>2) above or below the diagonal indicate antagonistic or synergistic effects, respectively.

4.3. In Vitro Assays against P. vivax Field Isolates

Ten <span class="Species">P. vivax isolates were collected from June to July 2010 from malaria patients attending the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) clinics, Mae Sot region of the Tak Province in north-western Thailand under the ethical guidelines in the approved protocol OXTREC 027-05 (Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK). These samples were collected from patients with no prior antimalarial therapy and with microscopically confirmed P. vivax. After written consent, blood samples were collected by venepuncture in 5 mL volume lithium heparinized tubes, which were then transported to the laboratory at SMRU within 5 h of collection. The ten isolates were chosen for testing because the majority (>80%) of the parasites were at the mid trophozoite stage (around 20 h post invasion) and no schizonts were detected. After platelet and leukocyte removal [41], the susceptibility of these P. vivax isolates to AM1, chloroquine diphosphate (MW 515.9, Sigma-Aldrich®, Milan, Italy), and artesunate (Base MW282.3, Holly Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd., Tustin, CA, USA) was assessed as previously described [42,43].

4.4. In Vivo Efficacy Tests and Transmission-Blocking/Prophylactic Activities

In vivo anti<span class="Disease">malarial efficacy tests were performed using P. berghei (CQ sensitive, CQ-S) ANKA and P. yoelii (CQ resistant, CQ-R) rodent species in the standard four-day suppressive Peters’ test [26]. Groups of five CD1 mice were inoculated i.v. with 4 × 106 infected erythrocytes/mice. The compound, dissolved in standard suspending formula (SSV) (0.5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.5% benzyl alcohol, 0.4% Tween 80, 0.9% NaCl), was administered orally, once a day for a period of four days, starting two hours post-infection. Four drug doses were used, ranging from 1 to 30 mg/kg to determine ED50 and ED90 values. Parasitaemia was determined by microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood films taken on day four, processed using MICROSOFT® EXCEL spreadsheets (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA), and expressed as percentages of inhibition from the arithmetic mean parasitaemias of each group in relation to the untreated group. ED50 and ED90 values were calculated by GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA). (−)-AM1 was also tested in transmission-blocking and prophylactic studies using the <span class="Species">P. berghei/<span class="Species">A. stephensi model as described, with a few modifications [44]. For the transmission-blocking test, four BALB/c female <span class="Species">mice (18–20 g) were infected i.p. with 107 P. berghei-infected red blood cells. Four days later, once confirmed for gametocyte carriage, two mice were treated with 50 mg/kg (−)-AM1, through the oral administration of 500 µL of a methylcellulose suspension, obtained by dissolving a 20 mg/mL ethanol stock solution in 0.5% methylcellulose to a final 9% ethanol concentration. Two mice received the vehicle only as controls. One hour after the treatment, mice were anesthetized and exposed to the bites of 100 sugar-starved female mosquitoes, at 20 °C. Ten days after the blood meal, samples of mosquito midguts from each treatment (n = 40) were dissected and P. berghei oocysts were manually counted using light microscopy at 400× magnification. Oocyst numbers were log-transformed and the geometric means were compared using the Student’s t-test. For the prophylactic test, the experimental drugs were administered at 50 mg/kg per os for 4 consecutive days; 90 min after the last administration, <span class="Species">mice were infected by 6–10 infective mosquito bites. Thick and thin Giemsa-stained smears were prepared and examined on days 5–10 post-infection to assess parasite density per μL of blood. Rearing and handling of experimental animals was in full compliance with the Italian Legislative Decree on the “protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes” (D. Lgs. 26 of 03/04/2014) and in full adherence with the European Directive 2010/63/UE.

4.5. LC–MS/MS Analytical Methods

Samples from the metabolic stability and metabolism studies were analyzed under the following conditions: UPLC interfaced with a Premiere XE triple Quadrupole <span class="Chemical">Waters for stability studies, and Bruker Daltonics Ion Trap HCT Ultra for metabolic studies. A gradient from 2% to 100% (Water, MeOH, 5 mM Ammonium Acetate) over 2 min (stability) or 12 min (metabolism) in a C18 BEH (dimensions 1 by 50 mm for stability and 2.1 by 100 mm for metabolism, 1.7 µm column, 45 °C temperature, flow rate 0.5 mL/min) was used. For stability studies, the detection was performed in MRM (ESI positive, Q1/Q3 330.16/152.00, Cone Voltage 45 V; Extractor 5 V; Capillary 3.4 kV), while for metabolism studies, analysis was performed in Auto MS/MS mode (ESI positive; Capillary 109 V; Dry Temp 350 °C; Nebulizer 30 psi; Dry gas 10 L/min; HV capillary 500 V; Mass Accu time 500 µs; Mass range MS scan 100–600 amu, MS/MS 50–450 amu). Samples from the pharmacokinetic studies were analyzed under the following conditions: UPLC interfaced with a Premiere XE triple Quadrupole, <span class="Chemical">Waters. A gradient from 2 to 100% (Water, MeOH, 5 mM Ammonium Acetate) over 1.3 min was used in Acquity HSS T3 (dimensions 2.1 by 50 mm, 1.8 µm column, 40 °C temperature, flow rate 0.5 mL/min). Detection was performed in MRM (ESI positive, Q1/Q3 330.16/152.00, Cone Voltage 45 V; Extractor 5 V; Capillary 3.4 kV). The limit of detection was 1 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by Non-Compartmental Analysis, using the linear trapezoidal rule and uniform weight.

4.6. In Vitro Microsome Stability and Metabolism Studies

For stability and metabolism studies, test compounds were dissolved in <span class="Chemical">DMSO, diluted at the final concentration of 1 µM, and pre-incubated in duplicate for 10 min at 37 °C in potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 3 mM MgCl2, with rat, mouse, and human hepatic microsomes (Xenotech Europe, Pfungstadt, Germany) at the final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The reaction was then started by adding the cofactor mixture of NADP, Glc6P, and G6P-DH, in the presence of UDPGA 1 mM in human microsomes to promote glucuronide formation. Acetonitrile (with verapamil as internal standard) was added to the samples at the times time 0 and 30 min to stop the reaction. Samples were then centrifuged and the supernatants analysed and quantified by LC-MS/MS. Reference compounds of known metabolic stability, 7-ethoxycoumarin (7-EC) and propranolol, were used as controls. The percentage of the area of test compounds remaining after 30 min incubation was calculated in respect to the area of compounds at time = 0 min. A compound showing a % remaining greater than 95% at 30 min was considered stable. In biotransformation studies after, the full scan acquisition data were processed by MetaboLynx software (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) comparing the signals at times 0 and 30 min. Samples were re-analyzed by acquiring the daughter scan of the potential metabolites found during the full scan acquisition.

4.7. Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetic data were collected in <span class="Species">mice by testing the racemate and the enantiomers at the same single dose, and vehicle-utilized for in vivo studies (see composition in paragraph 4.4). Briefly, male CD-1 mice (Charles River Laboratories) weighing 18–22 g received single dose (10 mg/kg) oral administrations of the AM1 racemate and single enantiomers, each dissolved in SSV. For each experiment, twenty-four mice/dose and three mice/time-point were used. Blood samples were collected at eight selected time-points (15, 30 and 60 min; 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 h) under ethyl ether anaesthesia. The heparinized tubes containing blood samples were immediately placed on ice and centrifuged, and the supernatant collected and frozen at −80 °C prior to analysis. Pharmacokinetic plasma samples (spiked with internal standard) were filtered (Sirocco filter plate, Waters) under vacuum, and 5 µL analysed by LC-MS/MS.

4.8. P450 Assay

Potential inhibition of the five most important <span class="Species">human P450 isoforms (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4) was measured using BD Gentest assays using specific substrates that become fluorescent upon CYP metabolism [45]. Compounds, dissolved in DMSO, were tested in duplicate (n = 2) at 3 μM in a 96-well plate, as described [46]. Specific selective isoform inhibitors were added in each experiment as controls. The data were expressed as percentage inhibition in respect to the control without inhibition (<5% inhibition was considered no effect), and for standards, the IC50 (concentration causing 50% inhibition) was then determined by using Grafit v. 5.0.1 (Erithacus Software Ltd., Horley, Surrey, UK).

4.9. hERG Binding Assay

[3H]-<span class="Chemical">astemizole (PerkinElmer ITALIA Spa, Milan, Italy) radioligand binding assays were performed in <span class="CellLine">HEK293 cells membranes stably transfected with the hERG (U04270); non-specific binding was evaluated in the presence of an excess of 10 µM cold astemizole. Experiments were performed at 22 °C for 60 min in triplicate and compounds tested in a range from 0.03 µM to 30 µM. Two separate experiments were performed and data analyzed with non-linear fitting using a four-parameter logistic [47].
  45 in total

1.  Antimalarial benzoheterocyclic 4-aminoquinolines: Structure-activity relationship, in vivo evaluation, mechanistic and bioactivation studies.

Authors:  Dennis S B Ongarora; Natasha Strydom; Kathryn Wicht; Mathew Njoroge; Lubbe Wiesner; Timothy J Egan; Sergio Wittlin; Ulrik Jurva; Collen M Masimirembwa; Kelly Chibale
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  4-Aminoquinoline quinolizidinyl- and quinolizidinylalkyl-derivatives with antimalarial activity.

Authors:  Anna Sparatore; Nicoletta Basilico; Silvia Parapini; Sergio Romeo; Federica Novelli; Fabio Sparatore; Donatella Taramelli
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  The neglected burden of Plasmodium vivax malaria.

Authors:  K Mendis; B J Sina; P Marchesini; R Carter
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Aminoquinolines that circumvent resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in vitro.

Authors:  D De; F M Krogstad; F B Cogswell; D J Krogstad
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Transmission blocking activity of a standardized neem (Azadirachta indica) seed extract on the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei in its vector Anopheles stephensi.

Authors:  Leonardo Lucantoni; Rakiswendé S Yerbanga; Giulio Lupidi; Luciano Pasqualini; Fulvio Esposito; Annette Habluetzel
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Structure-activity relationships for antiplasmodial activity among 7-substituted 4-aminoquinolines.

Authors:  D De; F M Krogstad; L D Byers; D J Krogstad
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Novel antimalarial aminoquinolines: heme binding and effects on normal or Plasmodium falciparum-parasitized human erythrocytes.

Authors:  Fausta Omodeo-Salè; Lucia Cortelezzi; Nicoletta Basilico; Manolo Casagrande; Anna Sparatore; Donatella Taramelli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In vitro evaluation of hepatic and extra-hepatic metabolism of coumarins using rat subcellular fractions: correlation of in vitro clearance with in vivo data.

Authors:  Dayanidhi Behera; Anagha Damre; Alice Varghese; Veeranjaneyulu Addepalli
Journal:  Drug Metabol Drug Interact       Date:  2008

9.  A Worldwide Map of Plasmodium falciparum K13-Propeller Polymorphisms.

Authors:  Didier Ménard; Nimol Khim; Johann Beghain; Ayola A Adegnika; Mohammad Shafiul-Alam; Olukemi Amodu; Ghulam Rahim-Awab; Céline Barnadas; Antoine Berry; Yap Boum; Maria D Bustos; Jun Cao; Jun-Hu Chen; Louis Collet; Liwang Cui; Garib-Das Thakur; Alioune Dieye; Djibrine Djallé; Monique A Dorkenoo; Carole E Eboumbou-Moukoko; Fe-Esperanza-Caridad J Espino; Thierry Fandeur; Maria-Fatima Ferreira-da-Cruz; Abebe A Fola; Hans-Peter Fuehrer; Abdillahi M Hassan; Socrates Herrera; Bouasy Hongvanthong; Sandrine Houzé; Maman L Ibrahim; Mohammad Jahirul-Karim; Lubin Jiang; Shigeyuki Kano; Wasif Ali-Khan; Maniphone Khanthavong; Peter G Kremsner; Marcus Lacerda; Rithea Leang; Mindy Leelawong; Mei Li; Khin Lin; Jean-Baptiste Mazarati; Sandie Ménard; Isabelle Morlais; Hypolite Muhindo-Mavoko; Lise Musset; Kesara Na-Bangchang; Michael Nambozi; Karamoko Niaré; Harald Noedl; Jean-Bosco Ouédraogo; Dylan R Pillai; Bruno Pradines; Bui Quang-Phuc; Michael Ramharter; Milijaona Randrianarivelojosia; Jetsumon Sattabongkot; Abdiqani Sheikh-Omar; Kigbafori D Silué; Sodiomon B Sirima; Colin Sutherland; Din Syafruddin; Rachida Tahar; Lin-Hua Tang; Offianan A Touré; Patrick Tshibangu-wa-Tshibangu; Inès Vigan-Womas; Marian Warsame; Lyndes Wini; Sedigheh Zakeri; Saorin Kim; Rotha Eam; Laura Berne; Chanra Khean; Sophy Chy; Malen Ken; Kaknika Loch; Lydie Canier; Valentine Duru; Eric Legrand; Jean-Christophe Barale; Barbara Stokes; Judith Straimer; Benoit Witkowski; David A Fidock; Christophe Rogier; Pascal Ringwald; Frederic Ariey; Odile Mercereau-Puijalon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  The antimalarial ferroquine: from bench to clinic.

Authors:  C Biot; F Nosten; L Fraisse; D Ter-Minassian; J Khalife; D Dive
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.000

View more
  3 in total

1.  Potent Antimalarial Activity of Two Arenes Linked with Triamine Designed To Have Multiple Interactions with Heme.

Authors:  Yosuke Sakata; Kosuke Yabunaka; Yuko Kobayashi; Hirohisa Omiya; Naoki Umezawa; Hye-Sook Kim; Yusuke Wataya; Yoshimi Tomita; Yosuke Hisamatsu; Nobuki Kato; Hirokazu Yagi; Tadashi Satoh; Koichi Kato; Haruto Ishikawa; Tsunehiko Higuchi
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Quinolizidine-Based Variations and Antifungal Activity of Eight Lupinus Species Grown under Greenhouse Conditions.

Authors:  Willy Cely-Veloza; Diego Quiroga; Ericsson Coy-Barrera
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  A murine malaria protocol for characterizing transmission blocking benefits of antimalarial drug combinations.

Authors:  Yehenew A Ebstie; Alain R Tenoh Guedoung; Annette Habluetzel
Journal:  Malariaworld J       Date:  2020-04-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.