Literature DB >> 29191679

Intraocular pressure measurements and corneal biomechanical properties using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer, after several keratoplasty techniques, versus normal eyes.

J Hugo1, E Granget2, G Ho Wang Yin2, M Sampo2, L Hoffart2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of the cornea and their impact on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after lamellar keratoplasty, compared to healthy eyes, using a non-contact tonometer with a Scheimpflug camera.
METHODS: This study, from 2014 to 2015, included 22 primary DSAEK, 5 DALK, 6 DSAEK after PK, and 50 control eyes. Using a non-contact tonometer with a high-speed Scheimpflug camera (CORVIS ST, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), several biomechanical parameters were recorded, including radius at highest concavity (Rhc) and defomation amplitude (DA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) and uncorrected IOP, were also recorded. For the control eyes only, a corrected IOP was calculated, based on age, central corneal thickness, and biomechanical parameters.
RESULTS: Rhc was significantly lower after DALK (Rhc=5.54±0.71, P=0.007) and DSAEK (Rhc=6.26±0.77, P=0.042) compared to control eyes (Rhc=6.82±0.76). DA was higher after DALK and DSAEK, but not significantly (respectively 1.24±0.09 P=0.41 and 1.22±0.15, P=0.923) compared to normal eyes (1.18±0.15). Uncorrected IOP was not significantly different between post-keratoplasty and control eyes. In control eyes, the corrected IOP (15.23±1.88) was lower than the uncorrected IOP (16.10±2.34); a statistically significant positive correlation between Rhc and CCT (R2=0.6020, P<0001), and a significant negative correlation between DA and CCT (R2=-0.641, P<0.0001) were found.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that, after lamellar keratoplasty, corneal biomechanics are altered. Corneas with higher ocular rigidity will show a lower DA and a higher Rhc.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomécanique cornéenne; Corneal biomechanics; Intraocular pressure; Keratoplasty; Kératoplastie; Pression intraoculaire; Scheimpflug; Scheimpflug technology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29191679     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol        ISSN: 0181-5512            Impact factor:   0.818


  5 in total

1.  Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results.

Authors:  Mohamed Samy Abd Elaziz; Hoda Mohamed Elsobky; Adel Galal Zaky; Eslam Ahmed Maher Hassan; Mahmoud Tawfik KhalafAllah
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Biomechanically-Corrected Intraocular Pressure Compared To Pressure Measured With Commonly Used Tonometers In Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; AbbasAli Yekta; Ahmed Elsheikh; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Renato Ambrósio; Nasim Maddah; Zeynab Danesh
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2019-10-17

Review 3.  Corneal Biomechanical Assessment with Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Imaging During Non-Contact Tonometry: A Prospective Review.

Authors:  Pedro Manuel Baptista; Renato Ambrosio; Luis Oliveira; Pedro Meneres; Joao Melo Beirao
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-06

Review 4.  Corneal Vibrations during Intraocular Pressure Measurement with an Air-Puff Method.

Authors:  Robert Koprowski; Sławomir Wilczyński
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Early intraocular pressure changes following different keratoplasty techniques and association with cornea parameters and anterior chamber depth.

Authors:  Gulsah Gumus; Cigdem Altan; Yusuf Yildirim; Nilay Kandemir Beşek; Selim Genç; Ahmet Kirgiz; Gonul Karatas Durusoy; Alper Ağca
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.