Wenlong Xiang1, Yueping Zhang2, Hongfei Lin3, Chang-Jun Liu4. 1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. WenlongX@tju.edu.cn. 2. Department of Chemistry, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China. ypzhang@tju.edu.cn. 3. Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. hongfei.lin@wsu.edu. 4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China. ughg_cjl@yahoo.com.
Abstract
Nanoparticle/metal-organic frameworks (MOF) based composites have recently attracted significant attention as a new class of catalysts. Such composites possess the unique features of MOFs (including clearly defined crystal structure, high surface area, single site catalyst, special confined nanopore, tunable, and uniform pore structure), but avoid some intrinsic weaknesses (like limited electrical conductivity and lack in the "conventional" catalytically active sites). This review summarizes the developed strategies for the fabrication of nanoparticle/MOF composites for catalyst uses, including the strategy using MOFs as host materials to hold and stabilize the guest nanoparticles, the strategy with subsequent MOF growth/assembly around pre-synthesized nanoparticles and the strategy mixing the precursors of NPs and MOFs together, followed by self-assembly process or post-treatment or post-modification. The applications of nanoparticle/MOF composites for CO oxidation, CO₂ conversion, hydrogen production, organic transformations, and degradation of pollutants have been discussed. Superior catalytic performances in these reactions have been demonstrated. Challenges and future developments are finally addressed.
Nanoparticle/metal-organic frameworks (MOF) basedcomposites have recently attracted significant attention as a new class of catalysts. Such composites possess the unique features of MOFs (including clearly definedcrystal structure, high surface area, single site catalyst, specialconfined nanopore, tunable, and uniform pore structure), but avoid some intrinsic weaknesses (like limited electricalconductivity and lack in the "conventional" catalytically active sites). This review summarizes the developed strategies for the fabrication of nanoparticle/MOFcomposites for catalyst uses, including the strategy using MOFs as host materials to hold and stabilize the guest nanoparticles, the strategy with subsequent MOF growth/assembly around pre-synthesized nanoparticles and the strategy mixing the precursors of NPs and MOFs together, followed by self-assembly process or post-treatment or post-modification. The applications of nanoparticle/MOFcomposites for CO oxidation, CO₂ conversion, hydrogen production, organic transformations, and degradation of pollutants have been discussed. Superior catalytic performances in these reactions have been demonstrated. Challenges and future developments are finally addressed.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of highly porous crystalline materials, which are assembled by the coordination of metal ions with organic ligands [1,2,3,4]. Due to the reversibly self-correcting kineticcharacteristics that are controlled by the moderate coordination bond energies, MOF materials have exhibited their unique features, such as clearly definedcrystal structures, high surface areas, tunable and uniform pore structures, and specialconfined nanopore microenvironments [5,6]. These features make them promising materials for numerous applications. Nevertheless, a few weaknesses, such as limited electricalconductivity, poor thermal, and chemical stability, prohibit MOFs from exhibiting their full potential for practical applications. Therefore, it is urgently needed to further enhance the functional properties of MOF materials. Recently, the attempts have been made by combining MOFs with various functional materials to produce new functionalcomposites. These MOF basedcomposite materials can integrate the excellent properties and mitigate the shortcomings of the individualcomponents. The synergistic effects of both MOFs and other active components may cause the composites to possess new properties and unprecedented performance, which are not attainable by the individual parts. Up to now, MOFcomposites have been successfully fabricated with incorporating various active species, including metal or metal oxides nanoparticles (NPs), carbon materials, polymers, polyoxometalates (POMs), quantum dots (QDs), ionic liquids (ILs), and so on [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. These MOFcomposites have been widely employed in the areas of gas storage, separation, sensing, biomedicine, protection of bio-macromolecules, and catalysis [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].In term of catalytic application, MOFcomposites show some superior characteristics because of the unique features of MOFs mentioned above. For example, high porosity with orderedcrystalline pores and high surface areas contribute to the uniform dispersion and the high density of catalytic sites, which can improve the catalytic efficiency [5]. The confinedpore sizes can limit active species growth and agglomeration, and selectively transport different substrate molecules for size-selective catalysis [24,25]. These superior characteristics have made these composite materials promising in heterogeneous catalysis.To date, even though MOFcomposites, as heterogeneous catalysts, are still at a developing stage, a series of catalytic investigations have been reported. It has been demonstrated that MOFcomposites as heterogeneous catalysts have showed notable catalytic behavior, such as high activity, good stability, and reusability [5,8,12,16,17,18]. Although some reviews have been publishedcovering some topics on heterogeneous catalysis of MOFcomposites, this review aims to summarize the recent advances in this hot topic, including CO oxidation, CO2conversion, hydrogen production, organic reaction and pollutants remediation, and so on, over nanoparticle/MOFcomposite basedcatalysts (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
Heterogeneous catalysis of nanoparticle/metal–organic frameworks (MOF) composites.
2. General Synthesis of Nanoparticle/MOF Composites
There are three main established approaches for the immobilization of functional molecules or nanoscale objects in MOFs, known as ‘‘ship in bottle’’ approach, ‘‘bottle around ship’’ approach, and one-step synthesis approach.The ‘‘ship in bottle’’ approach involves the encapsulation of active small molecules components or NPs precursors in the cavities of MOFs, followed by further treatment leading to the desired functional structure (Figure 1a). Various techniques, such as solution infiltration, vapor deposition, and solid grinding have been exploited for introducing the NPs precursors into MOFs [7,26]. It is significantly challenging to precisely control the location, composition, structure, and morphology of incorporated guests when using this synthesis strategy. Zhang et al. [27] summarized the recent progresses in the size and structure control of MOF supported noble metalcatalysts. In addition, the possible formation of the precursors and products on the external surface of MOFs needs to be considered. In order to avoid NPs aggregation on the external surface of MOFs, a double-solvent method (DSM) was successfully developed to rationally introduce precursors into MOFpores, followed by further treatment, to produce NPs@MOFcomposites [9,28]. The DSM is based on a hydrophilic and hydrophobic solvent, and the large cages with hydrophilic environments and high pore volumes in some MOFs. The quantitative volume (less than the MOFpore volume) of the aqueous precursor solution can be readily incorporated into the pores of MOF, which was suspended in a large amount of low-boiling-point hydrophobic solvent, by capillary force and hydrophilic interactions. By using the DSM combined with the reduction with reducing agents, such as H2 and NaBH4, metallic NPs including Pt, Pd, Rh, Ni NPs, and AuNi, RuNi, AuCo, and CuCo bimetallic NPs were successfully immobilized inside the pores of MOFs without aggregation on the external surface of the framework [28,29,30,31,32,33].
Figure 1
Main approaches for the fabrication of nanoparticle/MOF composites. (a) Ship in bottle; (b) bottle around ship; and, (c) in situ one-step synthesis.
The “bottle around ship” approach, also known as the template synthesis approach, generally involves two steps (Figure 1b). Firstly, the functional molecules or NPs are synthesized individually and often stabilized by capping agents or surfactants. Subsequently, the pre-synthesized nanoscale objects are added into a synthetic solution containing MOF precursors to assemble the MOF. The nanoscale objects do not occupy the pore space of the MOF, but instead are surrounded by grown MOF materials. By using this method, the problems of the aggregation of NPs on the external surface of MOFs are limited, the size, morphology, and structure of entrapped NPs can be easily controlled because they are preformed prior to the assembly of MOF framework [26,34]. However, the introduction of NPs sometimes results in difficulties with the subsequent growth of the MOF because of the high interfacial energy barrier between the two kinds of materials. In addition, the presence of the capping agents (for example, polyvinyl pyrrolidonePVP) might be unfavorable for the complete exposure of active sites, and even alter or degrade the performance of the NPs.A one-step synthesis approach involves directly mixing the precursors solution of NPs and MOFs together, followed by the simultaneous growth of NPs and MOF, and assembling both of them into a nanostructure (Figure 1c). When compared with the above stepwise approaches, this strategy is straightforward and simple, but it usually needs to balance the rates of the self-nucleation and growth of the NPs and MOFs. In particular, the choice of the functional groups in organic linkers or solvents is vital for trapping the NPs precursors and stabilizing the NPs that were formed in situ and for facilitating the hetero-nucleation of the MOFs on the surface of the NPs [9,35].The different preparation methods of the catalyst may result in a noticeable difference of catalytic performance. For example, the uniform Pt NPs were successfully supported on or encapsulated inside MOF particles to prepare Pt/UiO-66-NH2 and Pt@UiO-66-NH2catalysts, through the solution infiltration technique (the ‘‘ship in bottle’’ approach) and “bottle around ship” approach, respectively [36]. The different methods cause a difference in the Pt location relative to the MOF, which leads to a very different photocatalytic activity. The internalPt NPs in the MOF greatly shortens the path of electron transfer from MOF to Pt NPs than supportedPt. As a result, Pt@UiO-66-NH2 exhibits much better charge-carrier utilization, and thus significantly higher photocatalytic activity towards hydrogen production than Pt/UiO-66-NH2. Furthermore, Pt@UiO-66-NH2possesses excellent stability and recyclability as a result of the great confinement for Pt NPs in the MOF.
3. Catalysis Applications
3.1. Catalytic CO Oxidation
CO oxidation has been extensively investigated in the field of heterogeneous catalysis due to the fundamental interest and its close relevance in practical applications, such as gas sensors for the detection of trace amounts of CO, automotive exhaust gas treatment, and polymer electrolyte fuel cells [37,38,39,40]. Herein, we addressed the CO oxidation reaction based on metal or metal oxide NPs/MOFcomposites. Table 1 summarizes the catalytic activities for CO oxidation of severalMOF-supported NPs catalysts [28,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Generally, MOF-supported NPs catalysts have shown good catalytic performance for CO oxidation at relatively high temperatures.
Table 1
Catalytic activities for CO oxidations on MOF-supported nanoparticles (NPs) catalysts.
Active Species (wt %)
MOF
T50a (°C)
T100b (°C)
Reference
Au (5%)
ZIF-8
170
210
[41]
Au (4%)
UIO-66
155
225
[43]
Pt (5%)
NH2-MIL-101(Al)
170
207
[42]
Pt (5%)
MIL-101(Cr)
118
150
[28]
Pt (5%)
N-UiO-67
100
120
[45]
Ag (5%)
Cu3(BTC)2
100
120
[48]
Pd (2.7%)
MIL-53(Al)
100
115
[44]
Pd (2.9%)
MIL-101(Cr)
92
107
[47]
Pd (5%)
Ce-MOF
77
96
[46]
Co3O4
ZIF-8
58
80
[49]
a Temperature for 50% conversion of CO into CO2; b Temperature for 100% conversion of CO into CO2.
Xu et al. [41] reported a pioneering study that describedMOF-supported noble metal NPs as an efficient catalyst for CO oxidation. The catalytic activity over Au@ZIF-8 for CO oxidation increases with increasing Au loading from 0.5 to 5 wt %, accompanied by the decrease of the temperature of 50% conversion of CO from 225 °C to 170 °C. The 5 wt % Au@ZIF-8 achieves a complete conversion of CO at approximately 210 °C. Afterwards, it was reported that the totalconversion of CO was achieved at around 200 °C by the Pt and Au NPs, supported on NH2-MIL-101(Al) and UIO-66, respectively [42,43]. Importantly, the reaction temperature of complete conversion of COcan be further reduced to below 150 °C by incorporating Pt, Pd, and Ag NPs with apposite MOF supports [28,44,45,46,47,48]. Wang and co-workers proposed that both the size of the metal NPs and the nature of the support play an important role on the catalytic performance of Pt@UIO-67 for CO oxidation through a combination study of experiment and DFT calculation [45]. EL-Shall et al. [46] reported high CO oxidation activities over Pd NPs supported on Ce-MOF. The Pd@Ce-MOFcatalyst with 5 wt % Pd loading shows surprisingly high catalytic activity, with a complete conversion at 96 °C. The authors proposed that the high activity was mostly attributed to the interaction of the Pd NPs and the Ce sites within Ce-MOF.In addition to MOF-supported noble metal NPs, MOF-supportedmetal oxide NPs as an active catalyst for CO oxidation was reported. Wang et al. [49] firstly employedZIF-8 as host to prepare hexagonalCo3O4 NPs via the thermolysis of cobalt nitrate that is accommodated in the pores of the MOF host at a low temperature of 200 °C. The Co3O4@ZIF-8composite exhibited excellent catalytic activity for CO oxidation, which was related to the highly dispersedCo3O4 NPs in the well-retainedMOF networks. Complete conversion of CO was achieved at 80 °C by the resulting composite catalyst with good cycling stability and long-term stability. Furthermore, this synthesis method can be easily extended to the preparation of other metal oxide NPs.
3.2. Catalytic CO2 Conversion
Catalyticconversion of CO2 into valuable chemicals, such as CO, CH4, CH3OH, HCOOH, cyclic carbonates, and so on, has consistently drawn significant attention [16,18,50,51,52,53]. The MOF basedcomposites have been developed as active catalysts for the conversion of CO2.Recently, metal or metal oxide NPs incorporated in MOFs have been proved to be effective catalysts for converting CO2 to valuable chemicals, including CO, CH4, CH3OH, and light olefins [33,53,54,55,56,57]. The Materials of Institute Lavoisior (MIL) and University of Oslo (UiO) families, and their surface modifiedMOFs were mainly used as supports due to their high thermal stability and high chemical stability in water. An efficient catalyst, which was prepared by encapsulating single Cu nanocrystal (18 nm) into UiO-66, was reported recently for CO2hydrogenation to methanol. It shows a steady eight-fold yield over the benchmark Cu/ZnO/Al2O3catalyst, with a 100% selectivity to methanol [54]. Interestingly, Wang and co-workers recently extended this approach with the use of a UiO-bpy MOF, which anchored ultrafine Cu/ZnO NPs within the pores to restrain the agglomeration of Cu NPs and phase separation between Cu and ZnO [55]. As shown in Figure 2, the resulting Cu/ZnO@MOFcatalysts exhibit remarkably higher activity (space-time yield of 2.59 gMeOH kgCu−1 h−1), higher selectivity (100%), and higher stability (>100 h) for methanol synthesis from CO2hydrogenation, when compared to the commercialCu/ZnO/Al2O3catalyst. Similarly, Lu et al. [33] prepared Ni NPs encapsulated in MIL-101(Cr) composites by double solvent method (DSM) and multiple impregnation method (IM) for CO2 methanation. The Ni@MIL-101(DSM) catalyst with Ni loading of 20 wt % exhibited surprisingly higher activity for CO2 methanation than Ni@MIL-101(IM), giving a CH4 turnover frequency (TOF) value of 1.63 × 10−3·s−1 at 300 °C. The author contributed the higher activity of Ni@MIL-101(DSM) to the more exposed Ni(111) facet, which was demonstrated by the result of DFT calculations that the Ni(111) plane has lower potential energy barrier (10.0 kcal/mol) for CO2 dissociation into COads and Oads than Ni(200) facet (20.3 kcal/mol).
Figure 2
(a) The space-time yield (STY) of MeOH vs reaction time over a period of 100 h on stream; (b) Selectivity of product vs reaction time. Reproduced with permission from Reference [55]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
The utilization of solar energy for the conversion of CO2 into valuable products is one of the best solutions to reduce carbon emission. Thus far, a range of photocatalysts, including TiO2, CdS, Zn2GeO4, graphite-like carbon nitride (g-C3N4), and other compounds have been successfully combined with MOFs to photocatalytically reduce CO2 [58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. For example, a metal-free semiconductor-composite (g-C3N4-ZIF-8) by growing ZIF-8 on the surface of g-C3N4 nanotubes for photocatalyticCO2conversion into CH3OH was recently reported [63]. The ZIF-8 on the surface increases CO2capture capacity, but impairs the surface charge transfer within the photocatalytic system due to the weaker electricalconductivity. The optimizedZIF-8 modified tubular g-C3N4 photocatalysts show the superior catalytic performance, giving a >3-fold yield of CH3OH, relative to the bulk g-C3N4.The separation efficiency of the photoinducedcharge carriers plays an important role in photocatalysis [18,66]. The introduction of metal atoms into MOF photocatalysts may suppress the recombination of photoinduced electrons and holes and significantly increase their photocatalytic activity. Yaghi et al. [64] reported the construction of Ag⊂Re-MOF with enhanced photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction to form CO, which resulted from the cooperation of the spatially confined photoactive Re centers and the intensified near-surface electric fields at the surface of Ag nanocubes (Figure 3a). A fine balance of proximity between photoactive centers is needed for cooperatively enhanced photocatalytic activity in Re-MOFs. The optimal Re3-MOF structure with the highest turnover on silver nanocubes shows a 7-fold enhancement in CO evolution rate over Re3-MOF under visible light (Figure 3b). Furthermore, Ag⊂Re3-MOF structure exhibits long-term stability of up to 48 h when compared to molecular H2ReTC, and the CO produced from Ag⊂Re3-MOFalmost doubles from that of H2ReTC after 48 h (Figure 3c).
Figure 3
(a) Structure of Re-MOF coated on Ag nanocube for enhanced photocatalytic conversion of CO2; (b) Photocatalytic CO2-to-CO conversion activity of Re-MOFs (blue line), Ag⊂Re0-MOF, Cu⊂Re2-MOF, and Ag⊂Re3-MOFs with MOF thickness of 16 and 33 nm; and, (c) Stable performance of Ag⊂Re3-MOF when compared to molecular H2ReTC. Reproduced with permission from Reference [64]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.
Besides, catalytic processes that convert CO2 into cyclic carbonates have been widely investigated due to their high atom efficiency and high value products [67,68]. A growing number of MOFs have been employed as catalysts for the formation of cyclic organic carbonate. Meanwhile, a strategy for combining MOFs with functional species, like ILs, together to form heterogeneous catalysts has been developed to enhance the catalytic activity for conversion of CO2 into cyclic carbonates [69,70,71]. Shi and co-workers [72] reported two IL functionalized bifunctionalcatalyst, MIL-101-N(n-Bu)3Br and MIL-101-P(n-Bu)3Br, as prepared by the covalent post functionalization of MOFs (Figure 4a). Due to the synergy of two functional sites including Lewis acid sites in the MOF framework and nucleophilic anion in the ILs, the MIL-101-N(n-Bu)3Br, and MIL-101-P(n-Bu)3Br catalysts showed the highest yield to propylene carbonate (PC) (>98%) for the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 and propylene oxide (PO), when compared to other MOFs under mild and co-catalyst free conditions (Figure 4b). Similarly, the catalytic activity of ILs supportedZIF-90 for the PO-CO2cycloaddition reaction is remarkably enhanced as compared to ZIF-90 [73].
Figure 4
(a) The structure of the catalysts MIL-101-N(n-Bu)3Br and MIL-101-P(n-Bu)3Br (Cr: green; C: gray; O: red; N: blue; Br: amaranth, and R=N or P); (b) The yield of PC from the cycloaddition of PO and CO2 catalyzed by different MOF catalysts. Reproduced with permission from Reference [72]. Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
3.3. Catalytic Hydrogen Production
3.3.1. Catalytic Hydrogen Generation from Chemical Hydrides
A number of metal NPs that were immobilized in MOFs with high catalytic activities have been investigated for hydrogen generation from liquid chemicalhydrides, such as aqueous formic acid (HCOOH), ammonia borane (NH3BH3), and hydrazine (N2H4). Due to the high specific surface area and tunable pore size, the loading of metal NPs inside MOFs could control the size of NPs in the confinedcavities and produce monodispersedmetal NPs, affording an enhancedcatalytic performance.In 2011, it was reported firstly that bimetallicAu-Pd NPs immobilized into MIL-101 and ethylenediamine (ED)-graftedMIL-101 (ED-MIL-101) were efficient catalysts for the hydrogen generation from formic acid at a mild temperature [74]. The obtainedAu-Pd/ED-MIL-101catalyst (Au-Pd loading: 20.4 wt %; Au:Pd = 2.46) exhibits superior catalytic performance when compared to those of other counterparts, giving a TOF of 106 h−1 at 90 °C. The enhanced activity is contributed to the smaller particle sizes of the Au-Pdalloy by the introduction of the electron-rich ED into MIL-101 and the strong synergistic effects between Au and Pd. This study reveals a new approach to immobilize metal NPs for hydrogen generation from formic acid. Since then, metal NPs, including monometallic NPs, bimetallic NPs, and even trimetallic NPs that were supported on various MOFs for hydrogen generation have been widely investigated [28,29,30,31,32,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91]. Table 2 summarizes the catalytic activities of different catalysts for hydrogen production from HCOOH, NH3BH3, and hydrazine. Among these MOF-supportedmetal NPs catalyst, the Au0.28Pd0.47Co0.25/MIL-101-NH2catalyst exhibits 100% selectivity to H2 and the drastically high activity for the dehydrogenation of formic acid at room temperature with a TOF value of 347 h−1 [86]. Interestingly, Yamashita and co-workers [91] recently reported the use of the synergisticcatalysis of plasmonicAu@Pd NPs, and Ti-doped amine functionalizedMOFs for enhancing hydrogen production from formic acid at room temperature. As shown in Figure 5, the activity of all supportedAu@Pdcatalysts is greatly enhanced under visible light irradiation, and the Au@Pd/UiO-66(Zr85Ti15) shows better catalytic performance under visible light irradiation when compared to those under dark conditions, giving a high TOF of 200 h−1. The similar cooperative promoting effect from both NPs and photoactive MOF was examined on a noble-metal-free catalyst Ni@MIL-101 for hydrogen generation from ammonia borane under assistance of visible light irradiation [88].
Table 2
Catalytic activities of different catalysts for hydrogen generation from chemical hydrides.
Catalyst
Chemical Hydrides
T (°C)
TOF (h−1)
Refernence
AuPd@ED-MIL-101
HCOOH
90
106
[74]
Ag20Pd80@MIL-101
HCOOH
80
848
[79]
Ag18Pd82@ZIF-8
HCOOH
80
580
[82]
Au28Pd47Co25/MIL-101–NH2
HCOOH
25
347
[86]
Ag25Pd75@NH2-UIO-66
HCOOH
25
103
[87]
Au@Pd/NH2-UiO-66(Zr85Ti15)
HCOOH
30
200
[91]
Ni@ZIF-8
NH3BH3
25
504
[75]
Ru@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
10680
[77]
Ni@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
3238
[88]
Pd@Co@MIL-101
NH3BH3
30
3060
[81]
Au7Ni93 @MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
3972
[29]
Ru30Ni70@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
16363
[30]
Au6Co94@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
1410
[31]
Cu30Co70@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
1176
[32]
CuCo@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
3102
[90]
FeCo@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
3048
[90]
NiCo@MIL-101
NH3BH3
25
2658
[90]
Ni80Pt20@ZIF-8
Hydrazine
50
90
[76]
Ni66Rh34@ZIF-8
Hydrazine
50
140
[80]
Ni88Pt12@MIL-101
Hydrazine
50
375
[78]
Ni42Rh58@MIL-101
Hydrazine
50
344
[84]
Ni85Ir15@MIL-101
Hydrazine
50
464
[85]
Figure 5
Amount of H2 produced through formic acid dehydrogenation in the dark (black bars) or under visible light irradiation (gray bars, λ > 420 nm, 320 mW·cm−2) over different catalysts. Reproduced with permission from Reference [91]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
In order to reduce the deposition of the metal NPs on the outer surface of MOF support, Xu et al. [28] successfully developed a double solvent approach combined with hydrogen reduction to immobilize the ultrafine Pt NPs inside the pores of MIL-101. The resulting Pt@MIL-101composite with 2 wt % Pt loading is highly active for H2 generation from aqueous ammonia borane at room temperature. By using a similar approach, AuNi [29], RuNi [30], AuCo [31], and CuCo [32] alloy NPs are also successfully encapsulated in the pores of MIL-101. The resulting MIL-101 supported bimetallic NPs catalysts present remarkably high catalytic activity for hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane, giving the highest TOF of 66.2 min−1, 272.7 min−1, 23.5 min−1, and 19.2 min−1, respectively.The hydrogen generation from the dehydrogenation of hydrous hydrazine has also been investigated using MOF-supported bimetallic NPs catalysts with high selectivity [76,78,80,84,85]. Highly dispersed bimetallicNi-Pt NPs are successfully immobilized onto ZIF-8 via a facile liquid impregnation method, followed by co-reduction [76]. The activity of the composite catalysts strongly depended on the Ni-Ptcomposition, and the catalyst Ni80Pt20/ZIF-8 exhibits the highest activity at 50 °C with a 100% hydrogen selectivity and a TOF value of 90 h−1. Following a similar approach, Luo and his co-workers [78,80,84,85] successfully encapsulated the bimetallicNi-Pt, Ni-Rh, and Ni–Ir NPs with different compositions into the cavities of ZIF-8 and MIL-101. The optimalcatalysts, Ni88Pt12@MIL-101 [78], Ni66Rh34@ZIF-8 [80], Ni42Rh58@MIL-101 [84], and Ni85Ir15@MIL-101 [85], enable the rapid and complete decomposition of hydrazine in an aqueous alkaline solution, with a 100% H2 selectivity at 50 °C, giving the highest TOF value of 375.1 h−1, 140 h−1, 344 h−1, and 464 h−1, respectively.
3.3.2. Catalytic Hydrogen Production from Water
The photocatalyticwater splitting is an ideal method for producing hydrogen. Developing new hybrid photocatalysts combined with MOFs is considered to improve the charge transfer/separation efficiency. Some researchers incorporate Pt NPs into MOFs to enhance hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity [36,92,93]. For example, approximately 3 nm Pt NPs are incorporated into or supported on UiO-66-NH2, to afford Pt@UiO-66-NH2 and Pt/UiO-66-NH2, respectively (Figure 6a) [36]. A high H2 evolution rate of 257.38 µmol·g−1·h−1, which is approximately 150 and 5 times higher than that of the parent MOF and the Pt/UiO-66-NH2, respectively, was achieved using a Pt@UiO-66-NH2 photocatalyst with the optimum Pt loading amount (2.87 wt %) (Figure 6b). In addition, as shown in Figure 6c, the Pt@UiO-66-NH2 shows better catalytic recyclability than that of Pt/UiO-66-NH2 because Pt@UiO-66-NH2 effectively restrains aggregation or leaching of Pt NPs during the reaction.
Figure 6
(a) Schematic illustration for the synthesis of Pt@UiO-66-NH2 and Pt/UiO-66-NH2; (b) The photocatalytic hydrogen-production rates of UiO-66-NH2, Pt@UiO-66-NH2, and Pt/UiO-66-NH2; and, (c) Recycling performance comparison between Pt@UiO-66-NH2 and Pt/UiO-66-NH2. Reproduced with permission from Reference [36]. Copyright 2016, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Recently, some functionalcomponents, including nickel particles [94], metal sulfides (e.g., MoxSy, NixSy, CdS) [95,96,97,98], reducedgraphene oxide (rGO) [99], g-C3N4 [100], and POMs [101] have been employed to replace precious Pt and improve the photocatalytic activity for HER. Excellent photocatalytic activity was achieved as well. Interestingly, MoS2 increases the photoactivity for the HER and was superior to Pt as a co-catalyst [96]. 1 wt % MoS2/UiO-66-CdS obtained a high H2 evolution rate of 25,770 µmol·g−1·h−1, approximately 2-fold higher than that of 1 wt % Pt/UiO-66-CdS. Lin et al. [101] reported the successful encapsulation of tetra-nickel-containing Ni4P2POMs into the pores of highly stable MOFs. The integration of the photosensitizing MOF framework and the POM catalyst allows for facile multi-electron transfer to enable an efficient HER, with turnover numbers as high as 1476.
3.4. Organic Reactions
3.4.1. Oxidation of Alcohols and Hydrocarbons
MOFcomposites have been employed as efficient catalysts for the selective oxidation of alcohols, which are commonly considered as the central reactions in organicchemistry. Li et al. [102,103,104] investigated the catalytic performance of a series of MOFcomposites that were fabricated with different metal NPs (Au, Pd, and Pt) in liquid-phase aerobic oxidation of alcohols. The resulting Au/MIL-101, Pd/UIO-67, and Pt/DUT-5 composite catalysts exhibit excellent catalytic activities in a variety of alcohols oxidation reactions under base-free conditions, with exceeding 99% conversions and up to 100% selectivity to cinnamyl aldehyde. The authors attributed the superior catalytic activity to the beneficial synergetic effects of the electron donation and nano-confinement that is offered by the MOF framework.Other composite systems, including Au NPs, metal nanoclusters, POMs, CdS, and rGO, also exhibit high catalytic activities for selective oxidation of various alcohol substrates to aldehydes [105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. For example, Zhu et al. [106] recently reported the atomically precise nanoclusters@MIL-101composites, prepared by using MOFs as the size-confining templates for the first time. Highly dispersedAu13Ag12@MOFcomposites exhibited favorable catalytic activity in the oxidation of benzyl alcohol toward benzaldehyde, exceeding 75% conversion and 100% selectivity.Besides, the aerobic oxidation of hydrocarbonscatalyzed by MOF based nanohybrid catalysts has also been explored. Various active species, including Au, AuPd, PtPdalloy NPs, POMs, and grapheme oxide (GO), combined with severalMOFs were proved to be active and selective in the oxidation hydrocarbons with molecular oxygen [108,112,113,114,115]. For example, the AuPd/MIL-101catalyst exhibited a superior activity and selectivity in the oxidation of cyclohexane to cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol (KA-oil) when compared with those of their pure metalcounterparts and an Au+Pd physical mixture, which may be correlated to the synergisticalloying effect of bimetallicAuPd NPs [113]. Cyclohexaneconversion exceeding 40% is achieved (TOF = 19,000 h−1) with >80% selectivity to KA-oil under mild solvent-free conditions. Recently, H3+PMo12−VO40@MIL-100 (Fe) (x = 0, 1, 2) hybrids were prepared by the encapsulation of POMs within a metal–organic framework using a hydrothermal method [116]. The hybrids show greatly improvedcatalytic performance for the allylic oxidation of cyclohexene using H2O2 as green oxidant. In particular, the hybrid H4PMo11VO40@MIL-100 (Fe) leads to 85% cyclohexeneconversion, 91% selectivity for 2-cyclohexene-1-one under optimizedconditions, as well as excellent stability and reusability.
3.4.2. Hydrogenation Reaction
Hydrogenation is a key reaction that is extensively employed in industry. The Pd, Pt, Ru, and Ni NPs, and their bimetallic NPs immobilized by MOFs have been proven to be active catalysts in the hydrogenation of a wide range of substrates including alkenes [117,118,119,120], alkynes [121,122], aromatics [123], nitro-aromatics [124,125], ketones [126], aldehydes [127,128], and other compounds [129,130].When considering the molecular sieving capability of the pore apertures of MOFs, the encapsulatedmetal NPs in the internal frameworks of MOFs have been demonstrated to exhibit interesting size selectivity for the hydrogenation of different alkenes [25,131,132]. For example, Jiang et al. [24] reported the beneficialcombination of the photothermal effects of metal nanocrystals with the favorable properties of MOFs for efficient and selective catalysis. As shown in Figure 7a, the Pd nanocubes (NCs)@ZIF-8composite shows significantly different catalytic activity for olefins with different molecular sizes. For n-hexene, approximately 100% conversion can be achieved, while large molecules, such as cyclooctene (5.5 Å), cannot access the ZIF-8 shell with a pore aperture of (3.4 Å), resulting in negligible conversion. More interestingly, the catalytic performance of the Pd NCs@ZIF-8composite in the hydrogenation of n-hexene is significantly improved by light irradiation (Figure 7b).
Figure 7
(a) Conversions of the hydrogenation of various alkenes over Pd NCs@ZIF-8 and Pd NCs under 100 mWcm−2 full-spectrum irradiation at room temperature; (b) The yields of the hydrogenation of 1-hexene with 1atm H2 over Pd NCs@ZIF-8 under full-spectrum irradiation with different light intensities at room temperature or upon heating at different temperatures. Reproduced with permission from Reference [24]. Copyright 2016, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Recently, Zhao and co-workers [128] successfully fabricated a sandwich nanostructuredcatalyst with a layer of Pt NPs encapsulated between a core and a shell made of MIL-101 (Figure 8). The MIL-101(Cr)@Pt@MIL-101(Fe) catalyst, with a shell of thickness 2.9 nm, exhibits excellent selectivity (95.6%) and almost full conversion (99.8%) for the selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde to cinnamyl alcohol. Furthermore, the shell thickness in sandwich nanostructures can be used to tune the activity and selectivity of sandwich-type catalysts. The design of a sandwich nanostructuredcatalyst provides a potential strategy for designing selective catalysts for many important, but highly challenging, reactions.
Figure 8
Synthetic route to generating sandwich MIL-101@Pt@MIL-101. Reproduced with permission from Reference [128]. Copyright 2016, Nature Publishing Group.
3.4.3. Catalytic C-C Coupling
C–Ccoupling reactions, including Suzuki-Miyaura, Ullmann, Heck, Sonogashira, and Stille reactions are among the most versatile and important reactions in organic synthesis [20]. Pd is the most common catalyst in promoting these coupling reactions, and hence MOF supportedPd NPs have been developed as C–Ccoupling catalysts [133,134,135,136]. Trzeciak and his co-workers [137] synthesized the supportedPd NPs on a nanoscale Ni-MOF by using a facile impregnation process with solvent in situ reduction method, which was confirmed as a highly active heterogeneous catalyst for the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction between aryl halides and phenylboronic acid. This composite catalyst gives high yields of different coupling products with good recycle stability, indicating the excellent performance of the catalyst.
3.5. Catalytic Remediation of Pollutants
Wastewater that is produced in many industrial processes often contains toxic organiccompounds and heavy metals, including organic dyes, phenols, hydrocarbons, pharmaceuticals, hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), and so on. It is necessary to reduce the concentration of pollutants before discharging the wastewater into the aquatic environment. Otherwise, various environmental and health issues could be induced. Among the physical, chemical, and biological technologies that are applied for the removal of pollutants, heterogeneous catalysis, including photocatalysis, has been demonstrated to be an efficient, economical, and green technique to degrade pollutants into easily biodegradable or less toxiccompounds. Recently, MOF basedcomposites with noble metal NPs, metal oxide/sulfides, GO, and other compounds have been proved to be a new class of catalysts, which are usable in the catalytic degradation of organicpollutants and Cr(VI) [138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159].
3.5.1. Catalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are increasingly adopted for the degradation of organicpollutants, owing to the in situ generation of highly reactive and nonselective radicals, such as •OH, •O2−, •OOH, and •SO4− [160]. In AOPs, heterogeneous photocatalysis has been developed to be a green and efficient approach to degrade various organicpollutants. Since the amenability to design MOFs by controlling the constituent metal ions and organic linkers, MOFs-based photocatalysts with various morphology and structure have a great potential in the degradation of organicpollutants and environmental remediation.Qiu et al. [154] firstly rationally fabricated a new type of core–shell Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) composite with a magneticcore and a designable MOF shell. This magnetic recyclable composite exhibits photocatalytic activity for methylene blue (MB) degradation under both UV-vis and visible light irradiation with good recycling stability. Based on a similar process, a yolk-shell Co3O4@MOF was successfully prepared via the fabrication of a uniform Fe-dopedMOF-5 shell around Co3O4 NPs [150]. The degradation rate of 4-chlorophenol in the presence of peroxymonosulfate over 99% within 60 min was achieved by the Co3O4@MOFcomposite with satisfactory reusability.Recently, Yuan et al. [142] reported a novel core–shell In2S3@MIL-125(Ti) photocatalytic adsorbent, which was prepared by a facile solvothermal method. The integratedcomposite exhibits excellent adsorption affinity, as well as superior photocatalytic activity, for the removal of tetracycline (TC). The photo-degradation efficiency for TC within a 60-min visible light irradiation is 63.3%, which is much higher than that of bare In2S3 or MIL-125(Ti), indicating the beneficial synergistic effect between MIL-125(Ti) and In2S3. The core–shell composites also revealgood performance for the removal of TC from various real wastewaters. Similarly, the CdS/MIL-53(Fe) and CdTe QDs/Eu-MOFcomposites show high photocatalytic activity in the degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) and Rhodamine 6G in water at room temperature under light irradiation [143,146].Alternatively, the bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX, X = Cl, Br, I) and MOFs composites are also effective in improving photocatalytic performance. BiOBr/UIO-66, BiOBr/NH2-MIL125(Ti), BiOBr/CAU-17, and BiOI/MIL-88B(Fe) nanocomposites have been reported as highly efficient photocatalysts for the degradation of organicpollutants [147,148,149,158].Unlike metal semiconductor photocatalysts, g-C3N4, a metal-free semiconductor, has been successfully employed as a semiconductor photocatalyst for pollutant degradation [141,144]. Yuan et al. [141] successfully combinedg-C3N4 with MIL-125(Ti) by a facile solvothermal method. The resulting g-C3N4/MIL-125(Ti) composite catalyst exhibits an excellent catalytic performance with good reusability and stability. The optimal photocatalytic performance is obtained at the g-C3N4content of 7 wt % for MIL-125(Ti), on which the rate of RhB photodegradation is 0.0624 min−1, which is about 2.1 and 24 times higher than that of pure g-C3N4 and MIL-125(Ti), respectively.
3.5.2. Catalytic Cr(VI) Reduction
Catalytic reductive transformation of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is a promising method to perform effective remediation of Cr(VI), because Cr(III) is much less toxic and can be easily precipitated and removed due to its lower solubility in water in contrast to highly water-soluble and toxicCr(VI).Xu, Yu and Trivedi’s groups reported active MOF-supported noble metal (Pt, Pd) NPs catalysts for the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) using formic acid [145,152,157]. The resulting composites exhibit favorable catalytic performance, as demonstrated by the short time of complete reduction of Cr(VI) into Cr(III). Importantly, Yu et al. [152] proposed a reasonable mechanism for the catalytic reduction of Cr(VI) into Cr(III), as evidenced by a series of experiments. Formic acid is first adsorbed on the surface of metal NPs, and is then is dehydrogenated to produce H2 and CO2, according to Equation (1). The generatedhydrogen, with high reduction capacity, then reduces Cr(VI) into Cr(III), as shown in Equation (2):
HCOOH → H
CrWu et al. [155] firstly reported the simultaneous degradation of different categories of pollutants, such as Cr(VI) and organic dyes, by using MOF-supportedPd NPs as a dual functional photocatalyst. As shown in Figure 9a, Pd@UiO-66-NH2 is highly active to almost completely reduce Cr(VI) into Cr(III) within 90 min under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 420 nm) at a pH range of 1–5, which is ascribed to the intimate interfacialcontact between Pd and UiO-66-NH2, leading to the efficient charge separation. More interestingly, the reduction of Cr(VI) is visibly enhanced when the organic dye (MB or methyl orange (MO)) is added into the reaction system. In the binary systems of Cr(VI)/MO and Cr(VI)/MB, the reduction ratios of Cr(VI) are 79% and ~100%, respectively, which are obviously higher than that in the single system (70%) (Figure 9b). Meanwhile, the presence of Cr(VI)also promotes the photocatalytic degradation of MB and MO, demonstrating the beneficial synergic effect between the photocatalytic reduction and oxidation process. Wu et al. [138] also reported that the MIL-53(Fe)-rGOcomposite exhibits high photocatalytic activity in simultaneous oxidation of organic dyes and the reduction of Cr(VI).
Figure 9
(a) Photocatalytic reduction of aqueous hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) with different amounts of H2SO4 solution (0.2 M); and (b) Simultaneous photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) and degradation of dyes (10 ppm) over Pd@UiO-66-NH2 under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 420 nm). Reproduced with permission from Reference [155]. Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Moreover, the rGO-UiO-66-NH2 and rGO-MIL-53(Fe) nanocomposites were successfully assembled by electrostatic attractive force for surface attachment [138,159]. The optimal photocatalytic performance is obtained at the rGOcontent of 2% and 0.5% for UiO-66-NH2 and MIL-53(Fe), for which the reduction ratio of Cr(VI) is even up to 100% under visible light illumination within 100 min and 80 min, respectively.Recently, Wang et al. [139] employedZnOcolloidal spheres as template and zinc source to successfully fabricate core-shell ZnO@ZIF-8composite. The resulting composite exhibits an enhanced selective photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) between Cr(VI) and MB, which is attributed to selective adsorption and permeation effect of the ZIF-8 shell.
4. Conclusions and Outlook
MOFs have been considered as idealcatalysts with clearly defined and designable crystal structures, high surface areas, tunable and uniform pore structures, and specialconfined nanopore microenvironments [27]. Some intrinsic weaknesses (like the lack in the catalytically active sites and limited thermal and chemical stability), however, hinder them from implementing the full potential for catalyst uses. With the improvement of the MOF syntheses, MOFs with enhanced thermal and chemical stability have been more and more available [9,14,27,35]. To enhance the catalytic properties of MOFs, MOF basedmetal and metal oxide NP composites have been prepared and successfully applied for many reactions. The ‘‘ship in bottle’’ strategy, ‘‘bottle around ship’’ strategy, and one-step synthesis strategy have been exploited for the syntheses of such composites. Among these strategies, the ‘‘ship in bottle’’ approach has some limitations in the precise control of the size, morphology, and composition of incorporated NPs. On the contrary, the size, morphology, and composition of NPs can be better controlled with the ‘‘bottle around ship’’ approach. The one-step approach is straightforward, but it usually needs the functional groups in organic linkers or solvents to trap the NPs precursors and stabilize the NPs that are formed.The present studies have demonstrated that the MOF based NP composite catalysts exhibit excellent catalytic performances for CO oxidation, CO2conversion, hydrogen production, organic reaction, and pollutant degradation. The high catalytic performances are contributed to the beneficial synergistic effects of MOFs and active sites of NPs. Significantly increasing applications of MOF based NP composite catalysts can be expected.However, MOFcomposites, as heterogeneous catalysts, are still under its early developing stage. In the view of structuralfeatures, MOFcomposites consist of active species, metal ions and organic ligands, which are the potential factors influencing the catalytic performance. The relationship between the catalytic behavior and the structuralfeatures still needs to be investigated further. Further improvement in the thermal and chemical stability of MOFs is required. The present syntheses of MOFs are not cheap. Some syntheses are complex and time consuming, with difficulty in the scaling up. Innovation in the syntheses of MOFs is one of the future developments. Besides the improvement in the syntheses of MOFs for catalyst uses, the following studies are expected to further lead the progresses in the MOFcomposite catalysts:A principal advantage of MOFs is their designable structure with clear chemistry. When metal or metal oxide NPs are introduced, not clear chemistry may be caused because of not only various complex issues of NPs (like defects), but the interaction between MOFs and NPs. This is the most significant challenge for the future development with opportunities. In order to develop a size, structure, and location controllable preparation of NP/MOFcomposites, the interaction between metal or metal oxide and the MOF support needs to be further investigated. The functionalization and modification of MOFs needs to be also further investigated. The involvement of organic links in the catalytic reaction and the formation of intrinsic structure of MOFs with NPs generate many fundamental thermodynamic and kinetic issues for catalyst investigations. The reported studies are mostly limited within the experimental exploitation of MOFs for various reactions. Regarding the difficulty in the catalyst characterization, more theoretical studies are needed [45,161,162].For the composites by the pre-synthesized NPs, the polymercapping agent, like PVP, has some negative effects on the catalytic properties. Alternatives to such agents should be investigated. In this regard, biomolecules, like peptide, can be a nice candidate [163,164,165]. Especially, the peptide metalcomposite can serve as an excellent nitrogen dopant, which will be good for the improvement of the electronic properties of the catalysts, especially, for photocatalyst and electro-photocatalyst.Since MOFs are now mostly thermal sensitive materials, innovation in the post treatment or modification of the NP/MOFcomposites at low temperatures is extremely important. We attempted to use the room temperature electron reduction [166,167] for the preparation of noble metal/MOFcomposite catalyst. The present result shows the NPs cannot disperse well into the pores of MOFs. Further improvement is required. Other new approaches are also needed.An important future direction is the preparation of NP/MOFcomposites, together with gels, graphene, porous polymers, ionic liquids, and others, especially for the blooming photocatalytic and photo-electro-catalytic applications [168,169].The development of MOF based solid acid and solid base will create more opportunities for NP/MOFcomposite catalysts [170].MOF itself has been demonstrated to be an excellent single site catalyst, with which metal nodes in MOFs mimic homogeneous catalysts not only functionally but also mechanistically [171,172]. It provides a blueprint for the development of advanced heterogeneous catalysts with similar degrees of tunability to their homogeneous counterparts. It could open new ways for the investigations of NP/MOFcatalysts or MOF supported NP catalysts, which possess characteristics and advantages of both heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts.
Authors: Guang Lu; Shaozhou Li; Zhen Guo; Omar K Farha; Brad G Hauser; Xiaoying Qi; Yi Wang; Xin Wang; Sanyang Han; Xiaogang Liu; Joseph S DuChene; Hua Zhang; Qichun Zhang; Xiaodong Chen; Jan Ma; Say Chye Joachim Loo; Wei D Wei; Yanhui Yang; Joseph T Hupp; Fengwei Huo Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2012-02-19 Impact factor: 24.427