| Literature DB >> 29188049 |
Olamide A Akande1, Dorothy Nakimbugwe2, Ivan M Mukisa2.
Abstract
Malnutrition is one of the foremost causes of death among children below 5 years in developing countries. Development of nutrient-dense food formulations using locally available crops has been proposed as a means to combat this menace. This study optimized the extrusion process for the production of a nutritious amaranth-based porridge flour. Least cost formulations containing grain amaranth, groundnut, iron-rich beans, pumpkin, orange-fleshed sweet potato, carrot, and maize were developed and evaluated by a sensory panel (n = 30) for acceptability using the 9-point hedonic scale. Extrusion process of the most acceptable porridge flour was optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). Barrel temperature (130-170°C) and feed moisture content (14%-20%) were the independent variables which significantly (p < .05) affected in vitro protein digestibility, vitamin A retention, total polyphenol, phytic content, and iron and zinc extractabilities. Optimization of the extrusion process improved the nutritional quality of the instant flour.Entities:
Keywords: Extrusion cooking; grain amaranth; instant porridge flour; optimization
Year: 2017 PMID: 29188049 PMCID: PMC5694879 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
The amaranth‐based formulations designed to meet 90% protein, 30% energy, 45% vitamin A, 60% iron, and 70% zinc of the recommended dietary intake of children below 5 years of age
| Formulations | Proportion (%) of the different ingredients in the composite flour | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grain amaranth | ROBA beans | Groundnut | Carrot | OFSP | Pumpkin | Maize | |
| 1 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 2 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | 35 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 10 |
| 4 | 45 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| 5 | 50 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 6 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 10 |
Independent variables and levels for extrusion used in the central composite design
| Independent variables | Symbol | Coded variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Barrel temperature (third zone) (°C) |
| 130 | 150 | 170 |
| Feed moisture (%) |
| 14 | 17 | 20 |
The dependent variables were expressed individually as a function of the independent variables (Table 2). Data were fitted to a second‐order approximation model using Equation (1).
where Y is the response function, X i is the feed moisture content, X j is the barrel temperature, ε is the random error, B o the center point of the system, B i, B ii, and B ij represent the coefficients of the linear, quadratic, and interactive effects of the dependent variables, respectively, and X i, X i 2, and X i X j represent the linear, quadratic, and interactive effects, respectively, of the independent variable.
Consumer acceptability scores of porridges prepared from different formulations of amaranth‐based composite flours
| Formulation | Color | Aroma | Texture | Thickness | Taste | After taste | Overall appearance | Overall acceptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.8 ± 1.6cd | 6.4 ± 1.1b | 7.0 ± 1.0ab | 6.9 ± 1.1ab | 6.9 ± 1.0ab | 6.7 ± 1.0a | 6.7 ± 0.8b | 7.1 ± 0.8bc |
| 2 | 6.4 ± 1.6abc | 6.1 ± 1.3bc | 6.6 ± 1.2b | 6.2 ± 1.7bc | 5.9 ± 1.6c | 6.4 ± 1.5a | 6.8 ± 1.2b | 6.7 ± 1.1c |
| 3 | 5.2 ± 2.0d | 5.5 ± 1.8c | 5.2 ± 1.6c | 5.5 ± 1.7c | 4.6 ± 1.6d | 5.2 ± 1.8b | 5.1 ± 1.4c | 5.4 ± 1.0d |
| 4 | 6.2 ± 1.4bc | 6.3 ± 1.3bc | 5.9 ± 1.7c | 6.6 ± 1.6ab | 6.5 ± 1.4bc | 6.5 ± 1.4a | 6.5 ± 1.0b | 6.8 ± 0.9c |
| 5 | 7.3 ± 1.4a | 6.1 ± 1.4bc | 6.8 ± 1.1ab | 7.2 ± 0.9a | 6.6 ± 1.4bc | 6.7 ± 1.0a | 7.6 ± 0.9a | 7.4 ± 0.7b |
| 6 | 7.1 ± 1.7ab | 7.4 ± 1.0a | 7.5 ± 1.0a | 6.7 ± 1.6ab | 7.4 ± 1.0a | 6.9 ± 1.3a | 7.7 ± 1.0a | 7.9 ± 0.7a |
Values show mean ± SD (n = 30). Figures in the same column with the same superscript are not significantly (p > .05) different. A 9‐point hedonic scale was used with 1 = dislike extremely, 5 = neither like nor dislike, and 9 = like extremely. 1 = Grain amaranth (40%), ROBA beans (20%), groundnut (15%), maize (10%), and fresh OFSP (15%). 2 = Grain amaranth (40%), ROBA beans (20%), groundnut (15%), maize (10%), and fresh carrot (15%). 3 = Grain amaranth (35%), ROBA beans (20%), groundnut (15%), maize (10%), and fresh pumpkin (20%). 4 = Grain amaranth (45%), ROBA beans (20%), groundnut (15%), maize (10%), and OFSP flour (10%). 5 = Grain amaranth (50%), ROBA beans (20%), groundnut (15%), maize (10%), and carrot flour (5%). 6 = Grain amaranth (40%), ROBA beans (20%), groundnut (15%), maize (10%), and pumpkin flour (15%).
Effect of extrusion cooking on nutritional quality of the amaranth‐based flour
| Runs | FMC (%) | BT (°C) | FMC (%) | BT (°C) | PC (%) | PD (%) | Vit. A (μg RAE/100 g) | PP mg/100 g GAE | PA mg/100 g | Zn (%) | Fe (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | 14 | 130 | 18.14 | 85.23 | 590.80 | 261.25 | 69.61 | 43.38 | 15.12 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | 14 | 130 | 18.16 | 87.36 | 589.65 | 257.26 | 69.25 | 43.30 | 15.55 |
| 3 | 0 | −1 | 17 | 130 | 18.29 | 80.53 | 542.14 | 247.53 | 60.54 | 41.38 | 15.99 |
| 4 | −1 | 0 | 20 | 130 | 18.31 | 84.91 | 501.13 | 245.86 | 68.53 | 42.68 | 17.01 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 150 | 17.92 | 86.87 | 589.21 | 215.37 | 63.28 | 42.11 | 17.33 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 150 | 18.01 | 81.02 | 547.63 | 208.84 | 53.85 | 45.17 | 16.46 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 150 | 17.99 | 81.65 | 522.06 | 208.18 | 55.93 | 45.68 | 16.62 |
| 8 | ‐1 | 1 | 20 | 150 | 17.81 | 87.44 | 550.67 | 193.15 | 57.12 | 46.58 | 15.77 |
| 9 | ‐1 | 1 | 14 | 170 | 18.35 | 81.76 | 551.55 | 219.53 | 54.33 | 49.53 | 17.26 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 170 | 18.16 | 80.00 | 596.00 | 214.71 | 54.96 | 48.45 | 15.60 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 170 | 18.08 | 80.35 | 539.26 | 214.96 | 55.69 | 48.61 | 17.18 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 170 | 18.13 | 79.17 | 544.43 | 214.60 | 56.47 | 48.29 | 17.40 |
| Raw flour | – | – | – | – | 18.35 | 77.69 | 693.85 | 268.67 | 78.05 | 29.05 | 7.10 |
FMC, feed moisture content; BT, barrel temperature; PC, protein content; PD, protein digestibility; Vit. A, Vitamin; PP, total polyphenol content; PA, phytic acid; Zn, zinc extractability; Fe, iron extractability.
Comparison of sensory acceptability scores for amaranth‐based porridge and a commercial maize‐based porridge
| Attributes | Amaranth‐based composite porridge | Maize‐based porridge |
|---|---|---|
| Color | 7.29 ± 1.31a | 7.19 ± 1.32a |
| Aroma | 6.58 ± 1.42a | 6.90 ± 1.37a |
| Texture | 7.53 ± 1.01a | 6.19 ± 1.69b |
| Thickness | 7.76 ± 0.90a | 6.24 ± 1.73b |
| Taste | 6.82 ± 1.59a | 6.71 ± 1.68a |
| After taste | 6.12 ± 1.80b | 7.09 ± 1.22a |
| Overall appearance | 7.18 ± 0.88a | 6.57 ± 1.33a |
| Overall acceptability | 6.94 ± 1.09a | 6.81 ± 1.21a |
Values show mean ± SD (n = 48) at 5%. Figures in the same row with the same superscript are not significantly different (p > .05).
Figure 1Viscosities (cP) of the amaranth‐based instant porridge and maize‐based instant porridges at varied flour rates. ABIP, amaranth‐based instant porridge; MBIP, maize‐based instant porridge
Comparison of the pasting properties of amaranth‐based porridge and a commercial‐based porridge
| Pasting properties | Amaranth‐based instant porridge | Commercial porridge |
|---|---|---|
| Peak viscosity (cP) | 12.50 ± 0.08b | 13.46 ± 0.21a |
| Trough I (cP) | 12.04 ± 0.04b | 13.29 ± 0.21a |
| Breakdown viscosity (cP) | 0.46 ± 0.04a | 0.17 ± 0.00b |
| Final viscosity (cP) | 20.13 ± 0.05b | 21.29 ± 0.54a |
| Setback I (cP) | 8.08 ± 0.09 | 8.00 ± 0.33 |
| Setback II (cP) | 7.62 ± 0.13 | 7.83 ± 0.34 |
| Peak time (min) | 6.83 ± 0.17a | 5.60 ± 0.07b |
| Pasting temperature (°C) | 94.75 ± 0.00a | 72.88 ± 0.23b |
Values are means ± SD (n = 2). Values in the same row with different superscripts are significantly (p ≤ .05) different.
Calculated nutrient density (per 100 ml) of the porridges
| Nutrient | Amaranth‐based instant porridge (20 g/100 ml) | Maize‐based instant porridge (18 g/100 ml) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal) | 90.75 | 75.73 |
| Protein (g) | 3.79 | 4.32 |
| Iron (mg) | 2.40 | 1.44 |
| Zinc (mg) | 0.69 | 0.90 |
| Vitamin A (μgRAE) | 100.00 | 14.98 |