Literature DB >> 29187562

Development and Validation of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Candida auris from Surveillance Samples.

L Leach1, Y Zhu1, S Chaturvedi2,3.   

Abstract

Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast causing invasive health care-associated infection with high mortality worldwide. Rapid identification of C. auris is of primary importance for the implementation of public health measures to control the spread of infection. To achieve these goals, we developed and validated a TaqMan-based real-time PCR assay targeting the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of the ribosomal gene. The assay was highly specific, reproducible, and sensitive, with the detection limit of 1 C. auris CFU/PCR. The performance of the C. auris real-time PCR assay was evaluated by using 623 surveillance samples, including 365 patient swabs and 258 environmental sponges. Real-time PCR yielded positive results from 49 swab and 58 sponge samples, with 89% and 100% clinical sensitivity with regard to their respective culture-positive results. The real-time PCR also detected C. auris DNA from 1% and 12% of swab and sponge samples with culture-negative results, indicating the presence of dead or culture-impaired C. auris The real-time PCR yielded results within 4 h of sample processing, compared to 4 to 14 days for culture, reducing turnaround time significantly. The new real-time PCR assay allows for accurate and rapid screening of C. auris and can increase effective control and prevention of this emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen in health care facilities.
Copyright © 2018 Leach et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida auris; TaqMan chemistry; assay validation; real-time PCR assay; surveillance samples

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29187562      PMCID: PMC5786737          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01223-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


INTRODUCTION

Candida auris is emerging as a multidrug-resistant yeast causing invasive health care-associated infection with high mortality worldwide (1–6). Recently, it has emerged in the United States, with the majority of cases reported from New York (https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/candidiasis/candida-auris.html). The precise mechanisms leading to the emergence and spread of C. auris are currently unclear, but it raises several serious concerns for public health. Many isolates are multidrug resistant (MDR), with some isolates having elevated MICs to all three classes of antifungals (7–11). Many commercially available biochemically based tests, including analytical profile index (API) strips and Vitek 2, misidentify C. auris as Candida haemulonii, Candida famata, and/or Rhodotorula glutinis. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has emerged as a successful platform for the accurate identification of yeasts, including C. auris (10, 12, 13). Molecular methods based on sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and D1/D2 regions of the ribosomal gene can successfully differentiate C. auris from other closely related species (1). Although these techniques are excellent for the identification of C. auris, they are time-consuming, as they require an isolate. Recently, a real-time PCR assay using melt curve analysis to distinguish C. auris from other closely related species was reported (14). Here we report the development and validation of a TaqMan chemistry-based real-time PCR assay targeting the ITS2 gene of C. auris. Our results indicate that the real-time PCR assay is an important tool for rapid detection of C. auris from surveillance samples and able to provide more efficient control and prevention of the spread of this emerging multidrug-resistant yeast in health care facilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C. auris real-time PCR assay.

The multiple alignment of the ITS2 genes from all four clades of C. auris and closely related pathogenic yeasts revealed a region highly specific for C. auris (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Primers and a probe were designed from this region using the PrimerQuest program (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA). Primers and a probe were also designed for an inhibition control from a bicoid gene. Sequences for primers and probes for C. auris ITS2 gene were as follows: V2424F (CAURF), 5′-CAGACGTGAATCATCGAATCT-3′; V2425P (CAURP), 5′-/56-carboxyfluorescein (FAM)/AATCTTCGC/ZEN/GGTGGCGTTGCATTCA/3IABkFQ/-3′; and V2426 (CAURR), 5′-TTTCGTGCAAGCTGTAATTT-3′. Those for the bicoid gene were as follows: V2375 (BICF), 5′-CAGCTTGCAGACTCTTAG-3′; V2384 (BICP), 5′/Cy3/AACGCTTTGACTCCGTCACCCA/3IAbRQSp/-3′; and V2376 (BICR), 5′-GAATGACTCGCTGTAGTG-3′. All primers and probes were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. Each sample was tested in duplicate in 20-μl volumes using an optical 96-well reaction plate. Each reaction mixture contained 1× PerfeCTa Multiplex qPCR ToughMix (Quanta Biosciences), a 500 nM concentration of each C. auris primer (V2424 and V2426), a 100 nM concentration of each bicoid primer (V2375 and V2376), a 100 nM concentration each of C. auris (V2425P) and bicoid probe (V2384P), and 5 μl of DNA extracted either from C. auris or from the surveillance samples. Each PCR run also included 5 μl of positive extraction (C. auris M5658; 103 CFU/50 μl) and positive amplification (C. auris M5658; 0.02 pg/μl) controls, as well as 5 μl of negative extraction (reagents only) and negative amplification (sterilized nuclease-free water) controls. To prevent any cross-contamination, a unidirectional workflow was followed by keeping reagent preparation, specimen preparation, and amplification/detection areas separate. Cycling conditions on the ABI 7500 FAST were 95°C for 20 s, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 3 s and 60°C for 30 s. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a cycle threshold (C) value of ≤37 was reported as positive and >37 was reported as negative for swabs. Similarly, a C value of ≤38 was reported as positive and >38 was reported as negative for sponges. Specimens were reported as inconclusive if PCR inhibition was observed for either swabs or sponges.

Analytical sensitivity, reproducibility, and specificity.

C. auris isolate M5658, a major genotype belonging to the South Asia clade and involved in the current outbreak in New York, was used to assess the analytical sensitivity of the real-time PCR assay. In brief, C. auris was grown overnight on a Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) plate, and colonies were then scraped and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.01% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells were counted with a hemocytometer, serial dilutions were prepared, and the cell suspension was plated to obtain CFU. The yeast cell suspension was adjusted based on CFU recovered, and 50 μl of each cell dilution containing 2 beads (3 mm; Fisher Scientific) was processed for DNA extraction by first freezing cells at −20°C for 30 min, followed by heating at 70°C for 30 min and then bead beating at 4,700 rpm for 15 s in a Precellys 24 homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, France). Five microliters of extracted DNA from each cell dilution was tested in a real-time PCR assay in duplicate. The analytical sensitivity of the real-time PCR assay was determined by performing three independent DNA extractions. The analytical reproducibility of the real-time PCR assay was determined by extracting DNA from C. auris at a high (105 CFU/50 μl), moderate (103 CFU/50 μl), or low (102 CFU/50 μl) concentration, and 5 μl of extracted DNA was run in triplicate on three different days (interassay), as well as within the same day (intra-assay) of testing. The analytical specificity of the real-time PCR assay was determined by testing approximately 1 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA) from a panel of reference and clinical isolates of fungi (yeasts and molds), bacteria, parasites, and viruses. The analytical reproducibility and specificity of the real-time PCR assay were also assessed in previously determined negative surveillance swab and sponge matrices. In brief, 200 μl of liquid from swabs or sponges were pooled separately. Each pooled swab or sponge liquid was washed by centrifugation, resuspended in PBS-BSA to the original volume used for pooling, and then aliquoted into 43 μl. Every 10 aliquots (swab or sponge) were spiked randomly with 5 μl of a high (105 CFU/50 μl), moderate (103 CFU/50 μl), or low (102 CFU/50 μl) concentration of C. auris and 2 μl of bicoid DNA (5 × 10−3 ng/μl). Ten swab and sponge aliquots were also spiked with moderate numbers (103/50 μl) of other Candida spp. and bicoid DNA. All spiked samples were lysed and centrifuged, and 5 μl of supernatant was directly tested in duplicate using the C. auris real-time PCR assay.

C. auris real-time PCR assay surveillance sample study.

To evaluate the assay for identification of C. auris directly from surveillance samples, 623 surveillance samples, including 365 clinical swabs (axilla-groin, axilla, groin, nares, ear, rectal, and wound) and 258 environmental sponges from various health care facilities, were tested. Details of sample processing and DNA extraction are provided below. Each sponge-stick (3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN) received after environmental swabbing of various facilities was placed in a bag containing 45 ml of PBS with 0.02% Tween 80 (PBS-T80). Each bag was gently shaken for 1 min at 260 rpm in a Stomacher 400 circulator (Laboratory Supply Network, Inc., Atkinson, NH). The suspension from the bag was transferred into a 50-ml conical tube and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was decanted, leaving approximately 3 ml of liquid in the bottom of the tube. The concentrated sponge liquid was transferred into 3 separate sterilized tubes (Sarstedt Inc., Newton, NC). After processing of a specific volume (described below) for PCR and culture, the remaining liquid was saved at 4°C. Patient swabs that were received in liquid transport medium (Becton & Dickinson Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) were vortexed vigorously for 30 s, the swab was removed, and approximately 1 ml of liquid was transferred into a 2-ml sterilized tube (Sarstedt Inc.). The patient swabs that were received in solid transport medium (BD CultureSwab, Becton & Dickinson) were first removed from the solid medium and then placed in a glass tube containing 1 ml of PBS-T80. After vortexing for 30 s in the vortexer, the swab was removed and liquid was saved in a 2-ml sterilized tube. After processing of a specific volume (described below) for PCR and culture, the remaining liquid was saved at 4°C. For DNA extraction, 1 ml of sponge liquid and 200 μl of swab liquid were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. The recovered pellet was washed twice with PBS-BSA and resuspended in 48 μl of PBS-BSA. Two glass beads and 2 μl of bicoid inhibition control plasmid DNA (5 × 10−3 ng/μl) were added to each tube, followed by DNA extraction as described above for C. auris cell suspension, and 5 μl of extracted DNA was used in the real-time PCR assay in duplicate. The PCR results were then compared with culture results prospectively.

Statistical analysis.

GraphPad Prism 5 software for Mac (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) was used for statistical analysis. The Student t test was used for analysis of the means, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. To assess the diagnostic value of the real-time PCR assay in C. auris detection from surveillance samples, the culture method was selected as the “gold standard.” According to results obtained from both methods, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (MedCalc software version 17.8; Ostend, Belgium) analysis was generated, with the area under the curve (AUC) of real-time PCR calculated. The optimal diagnostic cutoff value was determined by calculating the Youden index of the ROC curve. Statistical significance was set as a P value of <0.05.

RESULTS

Assay sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.

The C. auris real-time PCR assay was linear over 5 orders of magnitude, and the limit of detection of the assay was 1 C. auris CFU/PCR using 45 PCR cycles in all three extraction processes, confirming the high analytical sensitivity of the assay (Fig. 1). The assay was highly reproducible, as it produced consistent C values for a given cell concentration on three different days of testing as well as within the same day of testing. The coefficient of variance (CV) was less than 5%, confirming the high reproducibility of the assay (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). Next, we determined the assay specificity by using genomic DNA (gDNA) from closely and distantly related fungal, bacterial, parasitic, and viral pathogens. The real-time PCR assay was highly specific, as none of the other organisms cross-reacted, while C. auris organisms belonging to all known phylogenetic clades by whole-genome sequencing yielded positive results (see Table S3 in the supplemental material).
FIG 1

Real-time PCR assay sensitivity. Candida auris cell dilution series containing 10−1 to 105 CFU/PCR reaction were run in duplicate on three different days. The slopes and correlation coefficients (R2) are shown. The detection limit of the assay was 1 C. auris CFU/PCR reaction.

Real-time PCR assay sensitivity. Candida auris cell dilution series containing 10−1 to 105 CFU/PCR reaction were run in duplicate on three different days. The slopes and correlation coefficients (R2) are shown. The detection limit of the assay was 1 C. auris CFU/PCR reaction. The assay reproducibility and specificity were also evaluated in swab and sponge matrices by spiking 40 swabs and 40 sponge samples with either C. auris or other Candida spp. in a blinded fashion. All the swab and sponge samples spiked with low to high numbers of C. auris were positive by real-time PCR assay, with a CV of less than 5%. However, one set of sponge samples spiked with a high number of C. auris cells revealed a marginally high CV, 5.71%. All swab and sponge samples spiked with other Candida spp. were negative (see Table S4 in the supplemental material).

Performance of C. auris real-time PCR assay on surveillance samples.

A total of 365 patient swabs and 258 environmental sponges were tested concurrently by culture and real-time PCR. These investigations were done in a blinded fashion, and then results were matched to determine the performance of the real-time PCR assay. Among the 365 patient swabs tested, 46 were true positive and 310 were true negative. Six of the culture-positive swabs were negative by the real-time PCR assay (false negative), while the assay picked up C. auris DNA from 3 culture-negative swab samples (false positive). Further analysis indicated that five of the six culture-positive swabs harbored fewer than 10 yeast cells in the 50 μl of concentrated swab suspension used for DNA extraction and hence fell below the detection limit of the real-time PCR assay (1 C. auris CFU/5 μl), and one swab had a PCR-inhibitory substance. Using the culture method as the gold standard, the accuracy of the real-time PCR assay for the detection of C. auris from patient swabs was determined to be 98%, with a clinical sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 99%, respectively (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Comparison of culture and real-time PCR results of swab surveillance samples

Real-time PCR resultNo. of swabs with indicated culture result
Accuracy (%)Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (%)NPV (%)
PositiveNegative
Positive4639889999498
Negative6310(77–96)(97–100)

CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

Comparison of culture and real-time PCR results of swab surveillance samples CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. Real-time PCR analysis of 258 sponge samples revealed 32 true positive and 200 true negative (Table 2). The real-time PCR assay detected C. auris DNA from an additional 26 culture-negative sponge samples (false positive). Again, based on culture as the gold standard, the accuracy of the real-time PCR assay for detection of C. auris from sponge samples was 90%, with a clinical sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 89%, respectively (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Comparison of culture and real-time PCR results of sponge surveillance samples

Real-time PCR resultNo. of sponges with indicated culture result
Accuracy (%)Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (%)NPV (%)
PositiveNegative
Positive3226901008955100
Negative0200(89–100)(84–92)
Comparison of culture and real-time PCR results of sponge surveillance samples We also used ROC curve analysis as a statistical tool for the diagnostic evaluation of the real-time PCR assay on surveillance samples. Compared with the culture method, the areas under the ROC curves for the real-time PCR assay were 0.940 for swabs and 0.978 for sponges. Both values were statistically significant (P < 0.0001) compared with the value of 0.5, which corresponds to the chance with no diagnostic value (Fig. 2 and 3). These results demonstrated that the real-time PCR assay has a highly accurate rate of detection of C. auris from the surveillance samples. The calculated Youden index for the ROC curves reached maximum C cutoff values of ≤37.0 and ≤38.0 for swabs and sponges, respectively, which can be used as the optimal diagnostic cutoff values for the surveillance samples.
FIG 2

ROC curve analysis of C. auris real-time PCR assay for patient (swab) surveillance samples. A ROC curve was plotted by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of the real-time PCR C values compared to culture results for swabs.

FIG 3

ROC curve analysis of C. auris real-time PCR assay for environmental (sponge) surveillance samples. A ROC curve was plotted by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of the real-time PCR C values compared to culture results for sponges.

ROC curve analysis of C. auris real-time PCR assay for patient (swab) surveillance samples. A ROC curve was plotted by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of the real-time PCR C values compared to culture results for swabs. ROC curve analysis of C. auris real-time PCR assay for environmental (sponge) surveillance samples. A ROC curve was plotted by calculating the sensitivity and specificity of the real-time PCR C values compared to culture results for sponges.

DISCUSSION

Candida auris has emerged as a multidrug-resistant yeast causing substantial mortality in health care settings worldwide. Rapid identification of C. auris directly from patient samples is of primary importance for the administration of empirical antifungal therapy and for the implementation of public health measures to control the spread of infection. In this investigation, we developed a real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of C. auris from surveillance samples. The real-time PCR assay provided rapid results within 4 h of sample processing, compared to the much slower culture results, which may take anywhere from 4 to 14 days. The assay was highly sensitive, with a detection limit of 1 C. auris CFU/PCR. The high sensitivity of the real-time PCR assay is not surprising since the multicopy ITS2 was used as a gene target. More importantly, the assay was highly specific, as no cross-reactivity was observed with all known closely and distantly related yeasts and other pathogens. Also, surveillance samples that were negative for C. auris DNA harbored other organisms, which did not cross-react, further confirming the high specificity of the real-time PCR assay (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). For culture-positive surveillance samples, the sensitivities of the real-time PCR assay for swabs and sponges were 89% and 100%, respectively. The reason for variability in sensitivity observed between swabs and sponges is not clear. One possibility could be the use of a larger volume of sponge (1 ml) versus swab (0.2 ml) resulting in the presence of more C. auris yeasts prior to DNA extraction and real-time PCR assay. Among the culture-negative surveillance samples, 26 sponge samples (12%) were positive by PCR and only 3 swab samples (1%) were positive by PCR, resulting in clinical specificities of 89% and 99% for sponge and swab, respectively. A scatter plot (Fig. 4) revealed a wider range of C values for culture-negative sponges than for culture-negative swabs, indicating that C. auris present in the environmental surfaces was either dead or growth defective. A recent study reported that C. auris can survive up to 2 weeks on plastic surfaces such as those found in health care settings (15). It is also important to note that environmental surfaces in health care facilities are consistently being cleaned with a variety of disinfectants, some of which are less potent for specific organisms than others. As a result, the real-time PCR assay possibly picked either residual DNA or dead or culture-defective C. auris. It is well known that bacteria and yeasts require quorum sensing to grow and multiply (16), and the absence of C. auris recovery in cultures from a PCR-positive patient or environmental site might reflect a failure in this system. Since PCR can pick up C. auris even when culture results are negative, it can provide increased insight into possible modes of dissemination within health care facilities.
FIG 4

C. auris DNA detection in swab and sponge samples by real-time PCR assay. Crude DNA from surveillance samples was extracted by the bead-beating method, and 5 μl of extracted DNA was subjected to the real-time PCR assay. Results are shown as a scatter plot based on C counts for surveillance samples either positive or negative by culture. Error bars indicate SDs. The mean C values between culture-positive and culture-negative samples for swabs and sponges were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

C. auris DNA detection in swab and sponge samples by real-time PCR assay. Crude DNA from surveillance samples was extracted by the bead-beating method, and 5 μl of extracted DNA was subjected to the real-time PCR assay. Results are shown as a scatter plot based on C counts for surveillance samples either positive or negative by culture. Error bars indicate SDs. The mean C values between culture-positive and culture-negative samples for swabs and sponges were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Our real-time PCR assay is able to detect all known clades of C. auris as reported by whole-genome sequencing (4), indicating that it has the potential for broader applications worldwide. Recently, Kordalewska et al. (14) described a real-time PCR assay utilizing a probe targeting the ITS1 and ITS2 region of the ribosomal gene followed by melt curve analysis to distinguish C. auris from other closely related Candida spp. However, the distinguishing features of our assay include the use of TaqMan probe chemistry, higher sensitivity (with a limit of detection of 1 C. auris CFU/PCR), inclusion of all known clades of C. auris as reported by whole-genome sequencing, and direct utilization of the test for detection of C. auris from large numbers of surveillance samples. Our assay provides a new and superior method to increase accurate and rapid screening of C. auris. Improvements in accuracy and speed of detection of C. auris from surveillance samples will help in devising strategies for containment of infected patients or colonized individuals and promote prompt cleaning of environmental surfaces so a further spread of C. auris can be prevented. In summary, C. auris is a well-known nosocomial global pathogen that has recently emerged as a significant threat in the United States, with the number of reported clinical cases identified by culture increasing rapidly, from 7 in August 2016 to 77 in May 2017 and 98 in mid-July 2017 (17). In the face of this critical development, our newly developed real-time PCR assay delivers badly needed, highly accurate, and rapid screening of C. auris from surveillance samples, promising more effective control to prevent the spread of this emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen in health care facilities (2–4, 7).
  17 in total

1.  Candidemia caused by amphotericin B and fluconazole resistant Candida auris.

Authors:  S Sarma; N Kumar; S Sharma; D Govil; T Ali; Y Mehta; A Rattan
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.985

2.  Identification and typing of the emerging pathogen Candida auris by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Victoria Girard; Sandrine Mailler; Marion Chetry; Céline Vidal; Géraldine Durand; Alex van Belkum; Arnaldo L Colombo; Ferry Hagen; Jacques F Meis; Anuradha Chowdhary
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.377

3.  Multidrug-resistant endemic clonal strain of Candida auris in India.

Authors:  A Chowdhary; V Anil Kumar; C Sharma; A Prakash; K Agarwal; R Babu; K R Dinesh; S Karim; S K Singh; F Hagen; J F Meis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Investigation of the First Seven Reported Cases of Candida auris, a Globally Emerging Invasive, Multidrug-Resistant Fungus - United States, May 2013-August 2016.

Authors:  Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Alex Kallen; Sharon Tsay; Nancy Chow; Rory Welsh; Janna Kerins; Sarah K Kemble; Massimo Pacilli; Stephanie R Black; Emily Landon; Jessica Ridgway; Tara N Palmore; Adrian Zelzany; Eleanor H Adams; Monica Quinn; Sudha Chaturvedi; Jane Greenko; Rafael Fernandez; Karen Southwick; E Yoko Furuya; David P Calfee; Camille Hamula; Gopi Patel; Patricia Barrett; Patricia Lafaro; Elizabeth L Berkow; Heather Moulton-Meissner; Judith Noble-Wang; Ryan P Fagan; Brendan R Jackson; Shawn R Lockhart; Anastasia P Litvintseva; Tom M Chiller
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Itraconazole-resistant Candida auris with phospholipase, proteinase and hemolysin activity from a case of vulvovaginitis.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Tuhina Banerjee; Chandra Bhan Pratap; Ragini Tilak
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the rapid identification of yeasts causing bloodstream infections.

Authors:  A K Ghosh; S Paul; P Sood; S M Rudramurthy; A Rajbanshi; T J Jillwin; A Chakrabarti
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Notes from the Field: Ongoing Transmission of Candida auris in Health Care Facilities - United States, June 2016-May 2017.

Authors:  Sharon Tsay; Rory M Welsh; Eleanor H Adams; Nancy A Chow; Lalitha Gade; Elizabeth L Berkow; Eugenie Poirot; Emily Lutterloh; Monica Quinn; Sudha Chaturvedi; Janna Kerins; Stephanie R Black; Sarah K Kemble; Patricia M Barrett; Kerri Barton; D J Shannon; Kristy Bradley; Shawn R Lockhart; Anastasia P Litvintseva; Heather Moulton-Meissner; Alicia Shugart; Alex Kallen; Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Tom M Chiller; Brendan R Jackson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Rapid and Accurate Molecular Identification of the Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen Candida auris.

Authors:  Milena Kordalewska; Yanan Zhao; Shawn R Lockhart; Anuradha Chowdhary; Indira Berrio; David S Perlin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Multidrug-Resistant Candida haemulonii and C. auris, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Authors:  Ronen Ben-Ami; Judith Berman; Ana Novikov; Edna Bash; Yael Shachor-Meyouhas; Shiri Zakin; Yasmin Maor; Jalal Tarabia; Vered Schechner; Amos Adler; Talya Finn
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  New clonal strain of Candida auris, Delhi, India.

Authors:  Anuradha Chowdhary; Cheshta Sharma; Shalini Duggal; Kshitij Agarwal; Anupam Prakash; Pradeep Kumar Singh; Sarika Jain; Shallu Kathuria; Harbans S Randhawa; Ferry Hagen; Jacques F Meis
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  49 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster as a model to study virulence and azole treatment of the emerging pathogen Candida auris.

Authors:  Sebastian Wurster; Ashwini Bandi; Nicholas D Beyda; Nathaniel D Albert; Nitya M Raman; Isaam I Raad; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Rapid Detection of Candida auris Based on Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP).

Authors:  Mikachi Yamamoto; Mohamed Mahdi Alshahni; Takashi Tamura; Kazuo Satoh; Shigekazu Iguchi; Ken Kikuchi; Masakazu Mimaki; Koichi Makimura
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Updates in Laboratory Diagnostics for Invasive Fungal Infections.

Authors:  David Terrero-Salcedo; Margaret V Powers-Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Direct Detection of Emergent Fungal Pathogen Candida auris in Clinical Skin Swabs by SYBR Green-Based Quantitative PCR Assay.

Authors:  D Joseph Sexton; Milena Kordalewska; Meghan L Bentz; Rory M Welsh; David S Perlin; Anastasia P Litvintseva
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Insights into the Unique Nature of the East Asian Clade of the Emerging Pathogenic Yeast Candida auris.

Authors:  Rory M Welsh; D Joseph Sexton; Kaitlin Forsberg; Snigdha Vallabhaneni; Anastasia Litvintseva
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Impact of Candida auris Infection in a Neutropenic Murine Model.

Authors:  Steven R Torres; Amber Pichowicz; Fernando Torres-Velez; Renjie Song; Navjot Singh; Erica Lasek-Nesselquist; Magdia De Jesus
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In Vitro Evaluation of Antifungal Drug Combinations against Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Isolates from New York Outbreak.

Authors:  Brittany O'Brien; Sudha Chaturvedi; Vishnu Chaturvedi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Laboratory Analysis of an Outbreak of Candida auris in New York from 2016 to 2018: Impact and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  YanChun Zhu; Brittany O'Brien; Lynn Leach; Alexandra Clarke; Marian Bates; Eleanor Adams; Belinda Ostrowsky; Monica Quinn; Elizabeth Dufort; Karen Southwick; Richard Erazo; Valerie B Haley; Coralie Bucher; Vishnu Chaturvedi; Ronald J Limberger; Debra Blog; Emily Lutterloh; Sudha Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Identification of Candida auris by Use of the Updated Vitek 2 Yeast Identification System, Version 8.01: a Multilaboratory Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Georges Ambaraghassi; Philippe J Dufresne; Simon F Dufresne; Émilie Vallières; José F Muñoz; Christina A Cuomo; Elizabeth L Berkow; Shawn R Lockhart; Me-Linh Luong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  A Rapid and Automated Sample-to-Result Candida auris Real-Time PCR Assay for High-Throughput Testing of Surveillance Samples with the BD Max Open System.

Authors:  L Leach; A Russell; Y Zhu; S Chaturvedi; V Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.