Alexia M Torke1,2,3,4, Christopher M Callahan5,6, Greg A Sachs5,6, Lucia D Wocial7,8, Paul R Helft9, Patrick O Monahan10, James E Slaven10, Kianna Montz5, Emily S Burke5, Lev Inger5. 1. Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA. atorke@iu.edu. 2. IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA. atorke@iu.edu. 3. Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. atorke@iu.edu. 4. Daniel F. Evans Center for Spiritual and Religious Values in Healthcare, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. atorke@iu.edu. 5. Indiana University (IU) Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA. 6. IU Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 7. Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 8. IU School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 9. Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 10. IU Department of Biostatistics, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized older adults require family surrogates to make decisions, but surrogates may perceive that the quality of medical decisions is low and may have poor psychological outcomes after the patient's hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between communication quality and high-quality medical decisions, psychological well-being, and satisfaction for surrogates of hospitalized older adults. DESIGN: Observational study at three hospitals in a Midwest metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized older adults (65+ years) admitted to medicine and medical intensive care units who were unable to make medical decisions, and their family surrogates. Among 799 eligible dyads, 364 (45.6%) completed the study. MAIN MEASURES: Communication was assessed during hospitalization using the information and emotional support subscales of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey. Decision quality was assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale. Outcomes assessed at baseline and 4-6 weeks post-discharge included anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), post-traumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), and satisfaction (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems). KEY RESULTS: The mean patient age was 81.9 years (SD 8.32); 62% were women, and 28% African American. Among surrogates, 67% were adult children. Six to eight weeks post-discharge, 22.6% of surrogates reported anxiety (11.3% moderate-severe anxiety); 29% reported depression, (14.0% moderate-severe), and 14.6% had high levels of post-traumatic stress. Emotional support was associated with lower odds of anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.85) and depression (AOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.65, 0.99) at follow-up. In multivariable linear regression, emotional support was associated with lower post-traumatic stress (β = -0.30, p = 0.003) and higher decision quality (β = -0.44, p < 0.0001). Information was associated with higher post-traumatic stress (β = 0.23, p = 0.022) but also higher satisfaction (β = 0.61, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Emotional support of hospital surrogates is consistently associated with better psychological outcomes and decision quality, suggesting an opportunity to improve decision making and well-being.
BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized older adults require family surrogates to make decisions, but surrogates may perceive that the quality of medical decisions is low and may have poor psychological outcomes after the patient's hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between communication quality and high-quality medical decisions, psychological well-being, and satisfaction for surrogates of hospitalized older adults. DESIGN: Observational study at three hospitals in a Midwest metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized older adults (65+ years) admitted to medicine and medical intensive care units who were unable to make medical decisions, and their family surrogates. Among 799 eligible dyads, 364 (45.6%) completed the study. MAIN MEASURES: Communication was assessed during hospitalization using the information and emotional support subscales of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey. Decision quality was assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale. Outcomes assessed at baseline and 4-6 weeks post-discharge included anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), post-traumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), and satisfaction (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems). KEY RESULTS: The mean patient age was 81.9 years (SD 8.32); 62% were women, and 28% African American. Among surrogates, 67% were adult children. Six to eight weeks post-discharge, 22.6% of surrogates reported anxiety (11.3% moderate-severe anxiety); 29% reported depression, (14.0% moderate-severe), and 14.6% had high levels of post-traumatic stress. Emotional support was associated with lower odds of anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.85) and depression (AOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.65, 0.99) at follow-up. In multivariable linear regression, emotional support was associated with lower post-traumatic stress (β = -0.30, p = 0.003) and higher decision quality (β = -0.44, p < 0.0001). Information was associated with higher post-traumatic stress (β = 0.23, p = 0.022) but also higher satisfaction (β = 0.61, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Emotional support of hospital surrogates is consistently associated with better psychological outcomes and decision quality, suggesting an opportunity to improve decision making and well-being.
Authors: Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Kianna Montz; Siu L Hui; James E Slaven; Christopher M Callahan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Alexia M Torke; Patrick Monahan; Christopher M Callahan; Paul R Helft; Greg A Sachs; Lucia D Wocial; James E Slaven; Kianna Montz; Lev Inger; Emily S Burke Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Elizabeth K Vig; Helene Starks; Janelle S Taylor; Elizabeth K Hopley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Blair Wendlandt; Agathe Ceppe; Summer Choudhury; Judith E Nelson; Christopher E Cox; Laura C Hanson; Marion Danis; James A Tulsky; Shannon S Carson Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2018-12
Authors: Alexia M Torke; George Fitchett; Saneta Maiko; Emily S Burke; James E Slaven; Beth Newton Watson; Steven Ivy; Patrick O Monahan Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Blair Wendlandt; Agathe Ceppe; Summer Choudhury; Christopher E Cox; Laura C Hanson; Marion Danis; James A Tulsky; Judith E Nelson; Shannon S Carson Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Brian M Bakke; Mariko A Feuz; Ryan D McMahan; Deborah E Barnes; Brookelle Li; Aiesha M Volow; Jana Powell; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.947