Andreas Frithioff1, Mads Sølvsten Sørensen1, Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen2,3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. stevenarild@gmail.com. 3. The Simulation Centre, Rigshospitalet, Center for HR, The Capital Region, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark. stevenarild@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In otorhinolaryngology training, introduction to temporal bone surgery through hands-on practice on cadaveric human temporal bones is the gold-standard training method before commencing supervised surgery. During the recent decades, the availability of such specimens and the necessary laboratory facilities for training seems to be decreasing. Alternatives to traditional training can consist of drilling artificial models made of plaster or plastic but also virtual reality (VR) simulation. Nevertheless, the integration and availability of these alternatives into specialist training programs remain unknown. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire study mapping current status on temporal bone training and included responses from 113 departments from 23 countries throughout Europe. RESULTS: In general, temporal bone training during residency in ORL is organized as in-house training, or as participation in national or international temporal bone courses or some combination hereof. There are considerable differences in the availability of training facilities for temporal bone surgery and the number of drillings each ORL trainee can perform. Cadaveric dissection is still the most commonly used training modality. CONCLUSIONS: VR simulation and artificial models are reported to be used at many leading training departments already. Decreasing availability of cadavers, lower costs of VR simulation and artificial models, in addition to established evidence for a positive effect on the trainees' competency, were reported as the main reasons. Most remaining departments expect to implement VR simulation and artificial models for temporal bone training into their residency programs in the near future.
PURPOSE: In otorhinolaryngology training, introduction to temporal bone surgery through hands-on practice on cadaveric human temporal bones is the gold-standard training method before commencing supervised surgery. During the recent decades, the availability of such specimens and the necessary laboratory facilities for training seems to be decreasing. Alternatives to traditional training can consist of drilling artificial models made of plaster or plastic but also virtual reality (VR) simulation. Nevertheless, the integration and availability of these alternatives into specialist training programs remain unknown. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire study mapping current status on temporal bone training and included responses from 113 departments from 23 countries throughout Europe. RESULTS: In general, temporal bone training during residency in ORL is organized as in-house training, or as participation in national or international temporal bone courses or some combination hereof. There are considerable differences in the availability of training facilities for temporal bone surgery and the number of drillings each ORL trainee can perform. Cadaveric dissection is still the most commonly used training modality. CONCLUSIONS: VR simulation and artificial models are reported to be used at many leading training departments already. Decreasing availability of cadavers, lower costs of VR simulation and artificial models, in addition to established evidence for a positive effect on the trainees' competency, were reported as the main reasons. Most remaining departments expect to implement VR simulation and artificial models for temporal bone training into their residency programs in the near future.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cadaveric dissection; Mastoidectomy; Simulation-based training; Surgical education; Temporal bone surgery
Authors: Yi Chen Zhao; Gregor Kennedy; Kumiko Yukawa; Brian Pyman; Stephen O'Leary Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Steven A W Andersen; Lars Konge; Peter Trier Mikkelsen; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Martin Frendø; Ebbe Thingaard; Lars Konge; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven A W Andersen Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Daniel Sieber; Peter Erfurt; Samuel John; Gabriel Ribeiro Dos Santos; Daniel Schurzig; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Thomas Lenarz Journal: Sci Data Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Andreas Frithioff; Martin Frendø; Kenneth Weiss; Søren Foghsgaard; David Bue Pedersen; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen Journal: OTO Open Date: 2021-12-13
Authors: Mahmood F Bhutta; Xingkuan Bu; Patricia Castellanos de Muñoz; Suneela Garg; Kelvin Kong Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 9.408