Literature DB >> 2918370

Kinesthetic and visual control of a bimanual task: specification of direction and amplitude.

M Flanders1, P J Cordo.   

Abstract

Kinesthetic information about a perturbation can quickly modify motor activity by producing reflexive compensation. The purpose of the present study was to determine how quickly kinesthetic information about target movement can modify motor activity. Visual information about target movement is known to guide motor activity both quickly and accurately. Therefore, we compared the speed and accuracy of responses to kinesthetically and visually presented targets. Human subjects produced changes in elbow torque as quickly and accurately as possible after the random presentation of 1 of 8 target torques. Information about the direction and amplitude of the target torque was provided either kinesthetically or visually. Responses to kinesthetic targets started at an average latency of 150 msec, and after an additional 159 msec, these responses became accurately graded according to target amplitude. Responses to visual targets started at an average latency of 250 msec, and after an additional 208 msec, these responses became accurately graded according to target amplitude. The accuracy of responses to kinesthetic targets was very similar to the accuracy of responses to visual targets. We conclude that the neural processing of kinesthetic information about target movement is sufficiently fast and accurate to guide typical motor activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2918370      PMCID: PMC6569788     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  12 in total

1.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Early responses to double-step targets are independent of step amplitude.

Authors:  R S Gellman; J R Carl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets.

Authors:  P van Donkelaar; R G Lee; R S Gellman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Forward estimation of movement state in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Grant H Mulliken; Sam Musallam; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The role of inertial sensitivity in motor planning.

Authors:  P N Sabes; M I Jordan; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Saccades to future ball location reveal memory-based prediction in a virtual-reality interception task.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Constantin Rothkopf; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Cognitive neural prosthetics.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Eun Jung Hwang; Grant H Mulliken
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  The influence of target sensory modality on motor planning may reflect errors in sensori-motor transformations.

Authors:  F R Sarlegna; A Przybyla; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Decoding trajectories from posterior parietal cortex ensembles.

Authors:  Grant H Mulliken; Sam Musallam; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The role of differential delays in integrating transient visual and proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Cristina de la Malla; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.