Literature DB >> 29182922

Quantitative trait loci for sensitivity to acute ethanol and ethanol consummatory behaviors in rats.

Bruce H Mandt1, Colin Larson2, Tina Fay3, Pequita Bludeau3, Richard M Allen1, Richard A Deitrich3, Richard A Radcliffe4.   

Abstract

Individuals with a low initial response to alcohol (i.e., ethanol) are at greater risk of developing alcohol abuse or dependence later in life. Similar to humans, individual differences in ethanol sensitivity also can be seen in rats, and several laboratories have used these individual differences to generate selectively bred rats that differ in acute ethanol sensitivity. We have worked with two sets of such rats (Inbred High or Low Alcohol Sensitivity strains, IHAS or ILAS, respectively; Inbred Alcohol Tolerant or Non-Tolerant strains, IAT and IANT, respectively) and have confirmed previously mapped quantitative trait loci (QTL) for these acute differences with the use of recombinant congenic lines; however, the relationship between acute sensitivity and ethanol drinking in these rats has yet to be determined. Thus, here we tested the hypothesis that QTLs underlying variation in initial low sensitivity to ethanol also will modulate variation in ethanol drinking behaviors. Separate groups of selectively inbred parent and congenic rats were tested for the loss of righting response (LORR) and also assessed for ethanol consummatory behavior using either operant self-administration or an intermittent-access two-bottle choice procedure. LORR testing confirmed the presence of a LORR duration QTL in all of the congenics; however, the lack of a corresponding difference in blood ethanol concentration at the regaining of the righting response suggests that these QTLs may be mediating a difference in ethanol metabolism rather than in neuronal sensitivity. IHAS/ILAS-derived congenic rats did not differ from parent rats at any point during operant self-administration. IAT/IANT-derived congenic rats showed small, but significant, increases in ethanol consumption relative to the parent strains only during the initial stages of operant self-administration. In contrast to operant testing, IHAS/ILAS-derived congenic rats showed significantly greater ethanol consumption and preference than parent rats during intermittent-access testing. There were not differences, however, between IAT/IANT congenic and parent rats during intermittent access. These data support the hypothesis that there is a genetic relationship between initial ethanol sensitivity and ethanol consumption, at least for the IHAS/ILAS-derived congenic rats. Our current studies, however, cannot eliminate pharmacokinetic or taste preference factors as contributing to the rats' responses, nor can we eliminate the possibility of a linkage effect because of the fairly large size of the QTL intervals; i.e., distinct genes may be mediating the acute sensitivity and drinking responses.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcoholism; Ethanol; QTL; Rats; Selected lines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29182922      PMCID: PMC5743759          DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol        ISSN: 0741-8329            Impact factor:   2.405


  36 in total

1.  Decreased ethanol sensitivity and tolerance development in gamma-protein kinase C null mutant mice is dependent on genetic background.

Authors:  B J Bowers; E H Owen; A C Collins; A Abeliovich; S Tonegawa; J M Wehner
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  The complexity of alcohol drinking: studies in rodent genetic models.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Tamara J Phillips; John K Belknap
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 3.  Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy.

Authors:  N R Richardson; D C Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Human and laboratory rodent low response to alcohol: is better consilience possible?

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Richard L Bell; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Genetic differences in tolerance and sensitization to the sedative/hypnotic effects of alcohol.

Authors:  D L Kurtz; R B Stewart; M Zweifel; T K Li; J C Froehlich
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Self-rating of alcohol intoxication by young men with and without family histories of alcoholism.

Authors:  M A Schuckit
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1980-03

Review 7.  Animal models of alcoholism: neurobiology of high alcohol-drinking behavior in rodents.

Authors:  W J McBride; T K Li
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1998

8.  Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism.

Authors:  M A Schuckit
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Exome sequencing and arrayCGH detection of gene sequence and copy number variation between ILS and ISS mouse strains.

Authors:  Laura Dumas; C Michael Dickens; Nathan Anderson; Jonathan Davis; Beth Bennett; Richard A Radcliffe; James M Sikela
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  A major QTL for acute ethanol sensitivity in the alcohol tolerant and non-tolerant selected rat lines.

Authors:  R A Radcliffe; V G Erwin; P Bludeau; X Deng; T Fay; K L Floyd; R A Deitrich
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.449

View more
  3 in total

1.  High-fructose diet initiated during adolescence does not affect basolateral amygdala excitability or affective-like behavior in Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Brendan O'Flaherty; Gretchen N Neigh; Donald Rainnie
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Rrn3 gene knockout affects ethanol-induced locomotion in adult heterozygous zebrafish.

Authors:  Fei Li; Jia Lin; Tingting Li; Jing Jian; Qi Zhang; Yinglan Zhang; Xiuyun Liu; Qiang Li
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Alcohol Sensitivity as an Endophenotype of Alcohol Use Disorder: Exploring Its Translational Utility between Rodents and Humans.

Authors:  Clarissa C Parker; Ryan Lusk; Laura M Saba
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-10-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.