Literature DB >> 29181740

Impact of mitral valve intervention with left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative outcomes and morphologic change.

Hiroki Hata1,2, Tomoyuki Fujita3, Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda4, Kensuke Kuroda5, Osamu Seguchi5, Yorihiko Matsumoto3, Masanobu Yanase5, Takuma Sato5, Seiko Nakajima5, Norihide Fukushima5, Junjiro Kobayashi3.   

Abstract

Although mitral regurgitation (MR) is prevalent in patients with end-stage heart failure, the impact of mitral valve (MV) surgery on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and morphologic changes of MV remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients who underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge to transplant. Of these, 11 (15%) underwent MV repair concomitant with or prior to LVAD implantation, while 27 patients with preoperative significant (moderate or greater) MR did not undergo concomitant MV surgery. The mean interval between LVAD implantation and the last echocardiographic examination was 913 days. Irrespective of MV surgery, significant LV reverse remodeling including decreased LV and left atrial dimension and improved MR severity was observed in all patients except for patients with prior MV surgery. Histopathological examination of explanted hearts removed at heart transplantation (n = 69) or autopsy (n = 5) revealed that the MV annulus was still dilated (mean perimeter 11.7 cm) in the patients with preoperative significant MR and no concomitant MV surgery. Concomitant MV surgery at the time of LVAD implantation for significant MR might not be always necessary for bridge to transplant or destination therapy cases. However, it might be required in patients having potential for cardiac recovery or patients with severe pulmonary hypertension and depressed right ventricle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Left ventricular assist device; Mitral regurgitation; Mitral valve; Reverse remodeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181740     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-017-1010-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  32 in total

1.  The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary.

Authors:  David Feldman; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Emma Birks; Katherine Lietz; Stephanie A Moore; Jeffrey A Morgan; Francisco Arabia; Mary E Bauman; Hoger W Buchholz; Mario Deng; Marc L Dickstein; Aly El-Banayosy; Tonya Elliot; Daniel J Goldstein; Kathleen L Grady; Kylie Jones; Katarzyna Hryniewicz; Ranjit John; Annemarie Kaan; Shimon Kusne; Matthias Loebe; M Patricia Massicotte; Nader Moazami; Paul Mohacsi; Martha Mooney; Thomas Nelson; Francis Pagani; William Perry; Evgenij V Potapov; J Eduardo Rame; Stuart D Russell; Erik N Sorensen; Benjamin Sun; Martin Strueber; Abeel A Mangi; Michael G Petty; Joseph Rogers
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Impact of Residual Mitral Regurgitation on Right Ventricular Systolic Function After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Serkan Ertugay; Hatice S Kemal; Umit Kahraman; Catagay Engin; Sanem Nalbantgil; Tahir Yagdi; Mustafa Ozbaran
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Significance of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Hayah Kassis; Krishna Cherukuri; Richa Agarwal; Manreet Kanwar; Subbarao Elapavaluru; George G Sokos; Robert J Moraca; Stephen H Bailey; Srinivas Murali; Raymond L Benza; Amresh Raina
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 12.035

4.  Resolution of Mitral Regurgitation With Left Ventricular Assist Device Support.

Authors:  Matthew Goodwin; Hassan W Nemeh; Jamil Borgi; Gaetano Paone; Jeffrey A Morgan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Mitral regurgitation and axial flow left ventricular assist device: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Matija Jelenc; Blaž Jelenc; Bojan Vrtovec; Ivan Kneževič
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Early and mid-term outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation and future prospects.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Tomoyuki Fujita; Yusuke Shimahara; Shunsuke Sato; Masanobu Yanase; Osamu Seguchi; Takuma Sato; Takeshi Nakatani; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-24

7.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Low operative mortality with implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and impact of concurrent cardiac procedures.

Authors:  Jay D Pal; Charles T Klodell; Ranjit John; Francis D Pagani; Joseph G Rogers; David J Farrar; Carmelo A Milano
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Left ventricular reverse remodeling with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device measured by left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions and severity of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Morgan; Robert J Brewer; Hassan W Nemeh; Raghav Murthy; Celeste T Williams; David E Lanfear; Cristina Tita; Gaetano Paone
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 10.  Patient selection for left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Keith D Aaronson; Himanshu Patel; Francis D Pagani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.