Literature DB >> 19752370

Low operative mortality with implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and impact of concurrent cardiac procedures.

Jay D Pal1, Charles T Klodell, Ranjit John, Francis D Pagani, Joseph G Rogers, David J Farrar, Carmelo A Milano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of concurrent cardiac procedures (CCP) on patient outcomes after HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device implantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one patients underwent implantation of a HMII as a bridge to transplantation from March 2005 to March 2007. One hundred seventy patients had an HMII implanted only, and 81 patients underwent concurrent cardiac procedures in conjunction with HMII implantation (HMII+CCP). Of these, 47 patients had concurrent valvular procedures, 15 patients had simultaneous closure of patent foramen ovale, and 19 patients had other various cardiac procedures. Patients requiring right ventricular assist device support or noncardiac procedures were excluded. Preoperative characteristics were similar for patients with and without concurrent cardiac procedures. Overall 30-day mortality was 5.8% for the HMII group and 11.3% for the HMII+CCP group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that simultaneous patent foramen ovale closure was not associated with an increased 30-day mortality rate, but concurrent valvular procedures increased the risk to 8.5%. Patients who underwent an aortic valve procedure had a 30-day mortality rate of 25%, higher than for isolated concurrent mitral (0%) or tricuspid repair (3.3%). Survival at 180 days was 87% for HMII alone and 80% for HMII+CCP. The hazard ratio for concurrent cardiac procedures adjusted for baseline parameters was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.10, P=0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a low 5.8% operative mortality rate for patients requiring uncomplicated HMII implantation, with no apparent increased risk for concurrent patent foramen ovale closure or mitral or tricuspid repair. However, concurrent aortic valve and other cardiac procedures are associated with significantly decreased perioperative and long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19752370     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.844274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  15 in total

Review 1.  Simultaneous procedures during left ventricular assist device implantation: is less always more?

Authors:  Nikhil Jaik; Robert S D Higgins; Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

Review 2.  Management of aortic insufficiency in the continuous flow left ventricular assist device population.

Authors:  Jonathan Holtz; Jeffrey Teuteberg
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

3.  Tricuspid regurgitation in left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Liberal use of tricuspid-valve annuloplasty during left-ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Kewal Krishan; Ajith Nair; Sean Pinney; David H Adams; Anelechi C Anyanwu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 5.  Role of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the Importance of Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Luca Longobardo; Christopher Kramer; Scipione Carerj; Concetta Zito; Renuka Jain; Valentin Suma; Vinay Thohan; Nasir Sulemanjee; Frank X Downey; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Impact of mitral valve intervention with left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative outcomes and morphologic change.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Tomoyuki Fujita; Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda; Kensuke Kuroda; Osamu Seguchi; Yorihiko Matsumoto; Masanobu Yanase; Takuma Sato; Seiko Nakajima; Norihide Fukushima; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Relationship of tricuspid repair at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation and survival.

Authors:  Robert J Brewer; Rafael Cabrera; Mazen El-Atrache; Amna Zafar; Tara N Hrobowski; Hassan M Nemeh; Yelena Selektor; Gaetano Paone; Celeste T Williams; Mauricio Velez; Cristina Tita; Jeffrey A Morgan; David E Lanfear
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 1.595

Review 8.  Cardiogenic shock in ACS. Part 2: Role of mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Kyriakos Anastasiadis; George M Wieselthaler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Concomitant aortic valve procedures in patients undergoing implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: An INTERMACS database analysis.

Authors:  Jason O Robertson; David C Naftel; Susan L Myers; Sunil Prasad; Gail D Mertz; Akinobu Itoh; Francis D Pagani; James K Kirklin; Scott C Silvestry
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 10.  The practical role of echocardiography in selection, implantation, and management of patients requiring LVAD therapy.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Todaro; Bijoy K Khandheria; Timothy E Paterick; Matt M Umland; Vinay Thohan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.