Klea D Bertakis1, Peter Franks, Rahman Azari. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, University of California, Davis, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To measure the impact of physician gender on patient satisfaction, controlling for confounding patient variables, and to examine the extent to which differences in satisfaction with male and female physicians can be explained by physician practice styles. METHOD: New adult patients (n=509) were randomized to see male and female primary care physicians at a university medical center outpatient facility. Patient sociodemographics and self-reported health status (using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36) were measured before the initial visit, and satisfaction with the physician was measured immediately following the visit. The entire medical encounter was videotaped and physician practice style was later analyzed using the Davis Observation Code. RESULTS: Female physicians spent a significantly greater proportion of the visit on preventive services and counseling than male physicians did, and male physicians devoted more time to technical practice behaviors and discussions of substance abuse. Visit length was not significantly different for male and female physicians. Patients of female physicians were more satisfied than were those of male physicians, even after adjusting for patient characteristics, visit length, and physician practice style behaviors. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with primary care physicians appears to be influenced not only by patient characteristics and physician behaviors, but also by the gender of the provider. Possible explanations for this may be that psychosocial aspects of the physician-patient interaction are different for male and female physicians. Patients may also bring expectations about female physicians to the encounter, presuming them to be more empathetic, nurturing, and responsive.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To measure the impact of physician gender on patient satisfaction, controlling for confounding patient variables, and to examine the extent to which differences in satisfaction with male and female physicians can be explained by physician practice styles. METHOD: New adult patients (n=509) were randomized to see male and female primary care physicians at a university medical center outpatient facility. Patient sociodemographics and self-reported health status (using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36) were measured before the initial visit, and satisfaction with the physician was measured immediately following the visit. The entire medical encounter was videotaped and physician practice style was later analyzed using the Davis Observation Code. RESULTS: Female physicians spent a significantly greater proportion of the visit on preventive services and counseling than male physicians did, and male physicians devoted more time to technical practice behaviors and discussions of substance abuse. Visit length was not significantly different for male and female physicians. Patients of female physicians were more satisfied than were those of male physicians, even after adjusting for patient characteristics, visit length, and physician practice style behaviors. CONCLUSION:Patient satisfaction with primary care physicians appears to be influenced not only by patient characteristics and physician behaviors, but also by the gender of the provider. Possible explanations for this may be that psychosocial aspects of the physician-patient interaction are different for male and female physicians. Patients may also bring expectations about female physicians to the encounter, presuming them to be more empathetic, nurturing, and responsive.
Authors: Anthony Jerant; Joshua J Fenton; Richard L Kravitz; Daniel J Tancredi; Elizabeth Magnan; Klea D Bertakis; Peter Franks Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Lisa L Cook; Richard P Golonka; Charles M Cook; Robin L Walker; Peter Faris; Shannon Spenceley; Richard Lewanczuk; Robert Wedel; Rebecca Love; Cheryl Andres; Susan D Byers; Tim Collins; Scott Oddie Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2020-11-16
Authors: Carol Coupland; Julia Hippisley-Cox; Sherie Smith; Will Irving; Mike Pringle; Steve Ryder; Keith Neal; Ruth Cater; Brian Thomson; Simon Pugh; Marcus Bicknell; David Bullock Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Neda Ratanawongsa; P Todd Korthuis; Somnath Saha; Debra Roter; Richard D Moore; Victoria L Sharp; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Karin Nieuwhof; Erwin Birnie; Maarten P van den Berg; Rudolf A de Boer; Paul L van Haelst; J Peter van Tintelen; Irene M van Langen Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Ana Traylor; Connie S Uratsu; Carol M Mangione; Assiamira Ferrara; Usha Subramanian Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.681