Literature DB >> 20463333

Clarifying sources of geographic differences in Medicare spending.

Stephen Zuckerman1, Timothy Waidmann, Robert Berenson, Jack Hadley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although geographic differences in Medicare spending are widely considered to be evidence of program inefficiency, policymakers need to understand how differences in beneficiaries' health and personal characteristics and specific geographic factors affect the amount of Medicare spending per beneficiary before formulating policies to reduce geographic differences in spending.
METHODS: We used Medicare Current Beneficiary Surveys from 2000 through 2002 to examine differences across geographic areas (grouped into quintiles on the basis of Medicare spending per beneficiary over the same period). We estimated multivariate-regression models of individual spending that included demographic and baseline health characteristics, changes in health status, other individual determinants of demand, and area-level measures of the supply of health care resources. Each group of variables was entered into the model sequentially to assess the effect on geographic differences in spending.
RESULTS: Unadjusted Medicare spending per beneficiary was 52% higher in geographic regions in the highest spending quintile than in regions in the lowest quintile. After adjustment for demographic and baseline health characteristics and changes in health status, the difference in spending between the highest and lowest quintiles was reduced to 33%. Health status accounted for 29% of the unadjusted geographic difference in per-beneficiary spending; additional adjustment for area-level differences in the supply of medical resources did not further reduce the observed differences between the top and bottom quintiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Policymakers attempting to control Medicare costs by reducing differences in Medicare spending across geographic areas need better information about the specific source of the differences, as well as better methods for adjusting spending levels to account for underlying differences in beneficiaries' health measures. 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463333     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0909253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  68 in total

1.  Health spending by state of residence, 1991-2009.

Authors:  Gigi Cuckler; Anne Martin; Lekha Whittle; Stephen Heffler; Andrea Sisko; Dave Lassman; Joseph Benson
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Mix of Maternity Care Providers in Canada.

Authors:  Harminder Guliani
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-08

3.  Dartmouth Atlas: putting end-of-life care on the map but missing psychosocial detail.

Authors:  Holly G Prigerson; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2011-09-23

4.  Receipt of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Medicare managed care plans.

Authors:  Gabriela Schmajuk; Amal N Trivedi; Daniel H Solomon; Edward Yelin; Laura Trupin; Eliza F Chakravarty; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Epidemiology of care for patients with serious illness.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Nancy L Keating; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Alan M Zaslavsky; Nicholas A Christakis; A James O'Malley
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Following the money: factors associated with the cost of treating high-cost Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Jack Hadley; Cynthia B Saiontz-Martinez; Ellyn R Boukus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Characteristics Associated with Home Health Care Referrals at Hospital Discharge: Results from the 2012 National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Christine D Jones; Heidi L Wald; Rebecca S Boxer; Frederick A Masoudi; Robert E Burke; Roberta Capp; Eric A Coleman; Adit A Ginde
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Estimation of standardized hospital costs from Medicare claims that reflect resource requirements for care: impact for cohort studies linked to Medicare claims.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Misti L Paudel; Brent C Taylor; Lih-Wen Mau; Beth A Virnig; Kristine E Ensrud; Bryan E Dowd
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Factors associated with variations in hospital expenditures for acute heart failure in the United States.

Authors:  Boback Ziaeian; Puza P Sharma; Tzy-Chyi Yu; Katherine Waltman Johnson; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.