Literature DB >> 29181318

Validity of automated refraction after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

César Albarrán-Diego1,2, Gonzalo Muñoz1, Stephanie Rohrweck1, Santiago García-Lázaro2, José Ricardo Albero1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical utility of automated refraction (AR) and keratometry (KR) compared with subjective or manifest refraction (MR) after cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery with implantation of Lentis Mplus X (Oculentis GmbH) refractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL).
METHODS: Eighty-six eyes implanted with the Lentis Mplus X multifocal IOL were included. MR was performed in all patients followed by three consecutive AR measurements using the Topcon KR-8000 autorefractor. Assessment of repeatability of consecutive AR before and after dilation with phenylephrine 10%, and comparison of the AR and KR with MR using vector analysis were performed at 3mo follow-up.
RESULTS: Analysis showed excellent repeatability of the AR measurements. Linear regression of AR versus MR showed good correlation for sphere and spherical equivalent, whereas the correlation for astigmatism was low. The mean difference AR-MR was -1.28±0.29 diopters (D) for sphere. Astigmatism showed better correlation between KR and MR.
CONCLUSION: We suggest AR sphere plus 1.25 D and the KR cylinder as the starting point for MR in eyes with a Lentis Mplus X multifocal IOL. If AR measurements are equal to MR, decentration of the IOL should be suspected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agreement; autorefraction; multifocal intraocular lenses; vector analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181318      PMCID: PMC5686373          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.11.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  19 in total

1.  Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?

Authors:  Jorge Jorge; António Queirós; José B Almeida; Manuel A Parafita
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Prevention of hyperopic surprise after LASIK in patients with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  César Albarrán-Diego; Gonzalo Muñoz; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Santiago García-Lázaro
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Subjective refraction before LASIK enhancement in bioptics procedures with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  César Albarrán-Diego; Gonzalo Muñoz; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology.

Authors:  Colm McAlinden; Jyoti Khadka; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Reliability of refraction--a literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; T Grosvenor
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1996-10

Review 6.  Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes.

Authors:  Richard A Armstrong
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Outcomes and complications of a multifocal toric intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section.

Authors:  Jan Venter; Martina Pelouskova
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision with combined symmetrical inferonasal near addition versus inferonasal and superotemporal placement of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Richard N McNeely; Eric Pazo; Andrew Spence; Olivier Richoz; M Andrew Nesbit; Tara C B Moore; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Gonzalo Muñoz; César Albarrán-Diego; Hani F Sakla
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Autorefraction, Retinoscopy, Javal's Rule, and Grosvenor's Modified Javal's Rule: The Best Predictor of Refractive Astigmatism.

Authors:  Kofi Asiedu; Samuel Kyei; Emmanuel Ekow Ampiah
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Na Hui; Mei-Fang Chu; Yan Li; Cong-Yi Wang; Lei Yu; Bo Ma
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Characterization of optical performance with defocusing curve: Analysis of two refractive intraocular lens models with high and medium addition.

Authors:  Jorge A Calvo-Sanz; Miguel A Sánchez-Tena
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2018-11-01

3.  Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with High Myopic Cataract after Implantation of AT LISA Tri 839MP and LS-313 MF30 Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Jiying Shen; Limei Zhang; Shuang Ni; Lei Cai; Haike Guo; Jin Yang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 1.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.