Literature DB >> 21615445

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology.

Colm McAlinden1, Jyoti Khadka, Konrad Pesudovs.   

Abstract

The ever-expanding choice of ocular metrology and imaging equipment has driven research into the validity of their measurements. Consequently, studies of the agreement between two instruments or clinical tests have proliferated in the ophthalmic literature. It is important that researchers apply the appropriate statistical tests in agreement studies. Correlation coefficients are hazardous and should be avoided. The 'limits of agreement' method originally proposed by Altman and Bland in 1983 is the statistical procedure of choice. Its step-by-step use and practical considerations in relation to optometry and ophthalmology are detailed in addition to sample size considerations and statistical approaches to precision (repeatability or reproducibility) estimates. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
© 2011 The College of Optometrists.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615445     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  93 in total

1.  Reproducibility of optical quality parameters measured at objective and subjective best focuses in a double-pass system.

Authors:  Ai-Lian Hu; Li-Ya Qiao; Ye Zhang; Xiao-Gu Cai; Lei Li; Xiu-Hua Wan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Software-dependent processing variability in SPECT functional parameters: Clinical implications.

Authors:  Saurabh Malhotra; Prem Soman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs other treatment modalities for glaucoma: systematic review.

Authors:  C McAlinden
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye.

Authors:  Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Colm McAlinden; Abbas Azimi; Mina Sobhani; Eirini Skiadaresi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The effect of pupillary dilatation on IOL power measurement by using the IOLMaster.

Authors:  Bharkbhum Khambhiphant; Nattida Chatbunchachai; Krit Pongpirul
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity.

Authors:  Ewan C Goligher; Franco Laghi; Michael E Detsky; Paulina Farias; Alistair Murray; Deborah Brace; Laurent J Brochard; Steffen-Sebastien Bolz; Steffen Sebastien-Bolz; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Brian P Kavanagh; Niall D Ferguson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Non-invasive measurements of the dynamic changes in the ciliary muscle, crystalline lens morphology, and anterior chamber during accommodation with a high-resolution OCT.

Authors:  José J Esteve-Taboada; Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Daniel Monsálvez-Romín; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Agreement in central corneal thickness measurements between optical and ultrasound pachymeters in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  M R Razeghinejad; Z Tajbakhsh; M H Nowroozzadeh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Repeatability of in-vitro optical quality measurements of intraocular lenses with a deflectometry technique effect of the toricity.

Authors:  Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Santiago García-Lázaro; María Amparo Díez-Ajenjo; José F Alfonso; José J Esteve-Taboada
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Measurement of Intraocular Pressure by Patients With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Savva Pronin; Lyndsay Brown; Roly Megaw; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.