Literature DB >> 28007103

Comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision with combined symmetrical inferonasal near addition versus inferonasal and superotemporal placement of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Richard N McNeely1, Eric Pazo1, Andrew Spence1, Olivier Richoz1, M Andrew Nesbit1, Tara C B Moore1, Jonathan E Moore2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative quality of vision between different bilateral placements of near segments of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to determine how this affects visual performance.
SETTING: Cathedral Eye Clinic, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative case series.
METHODS: The study enrolled consecutive patients having refractive lens exchange and implantation of rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs. Group 1 received bilateral SBL-3 IOLs and Group 2 received bilateral Lentis Mplus LS-312 MF30 IOLs, with the near segments placed inferonasally in each group. Group 3 received a Lentis Mplus LS-312 MF20 IOL in the dominant eye with the near segment positioned superotemporal and a Lenstec SBL-3 IOL positioned inferonasally in the fellow eye. Binocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities, binocular uncorrected near (UNVA) and intermediate (UIVA) visual acuities, binocular distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuities, and quality of vision were evaluated over 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 180 patients (360 eyes). There was no significant difference between the groups in binocular UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA; however, there was a significant difference between the groups in quality of vision (P ≤ .001). Group 3 had significantly better overall quality of vision.
CONCLUSION: When implanting rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs, a combination of superotemporal placement of the near segment (+2.00 diopter [D] addition [add]) in the dominant eye with inferonasal placement of the near segment (+3.00 D add) in the fellow eye yielded consistent, high overall quality of vision and uncorrected visual acuity. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28007103     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

1.  Validity of automated refraction after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  César Albarrán-Diego; Gonzalo Muñoz; Stephanie Rohrweck; Santiago García-Lázaro; José Ricardo Albero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Secondary positioning of rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens in a patient with glaucoma: A case report.

Authors:  Cong Fan; Yi Zhou; Jian Jiang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 1.534

3.  Outcomes of a Refractive Segmented Bifocal Intraocular Lens with a Lower Near Addition.

Authors:  Jan A Venter; Barrie M Collins; Stephen J Hannan; David Teenan; Julie M Schallhorn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 4.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.