Literature DB >> 29181267

Variation and repeatability of measured standardized uptake values depending on actual values: a phantom study.

Tomohiro Kaneta1, Na Sun1,2, Matsuyoshi Ogawa1, Hitoshi Iizuka1, Tetsu Arisawa1, Ayako Hino-Shishikura1, Keisuke Yoshida1, Tomio Inoue1.   

Abstract

Standardized uptake values (SUVs) are the most widely used quantitative imaging biomarkers in positron emission tomography (PET); however, little is known about the changes in variation and repeatability of SUVs depending on the magnitude of the values. We hypothesized that low SUVs have larger variations than high SUVs, and attempted various kinds of experimental PET scans using a phantom. By adjusting the ratio of F-18 solution to tap water, a NEMA IEC body phantom was set for SUVs of 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 inside six hot spheres. PET data were obtained for 4 hours, and the data reconstructed every 2 min. The SUVmax and SUVpeak of the spheres in all images were recorded. The relative SUVs were calculated by dividing the measured SUV by actual SUV, and used for the Bland-Altman plots. Some variation was observed for the measured SUVs. The measured SUVs for the actual SUV of 2.0 showed the largest variation among those of 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0, and those of 8.0 showed the smallest. Similarly, the relative SUVs showed significantly larger variations for lower values. In addition, the relative SUVmax showed larger variation and value than the relative SUVpeak. The Bland-Altman plots showed considerable variation and little agreement, but the degree of variation decreased as the measured value increased. We demonstrated some variation of the measured SUVs, which decreased for larger measured values. Clinicians should consider the inaccuracy of low SUVs not only in daily practice, but also for multi-institutional studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; QIBA; SUV; repeatability; variation

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181267      PMCID: PMC5698613     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging


  17 in total

1.  Determining the Minimal Required Radioactivity of 18F-FDG for Reliable Semiquantification in PET/CT Imaging: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Ming-Kai Chen; David H Menard; David W Cheng
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2016-01-14

2.  Benign versus malignant intraosseous lesions: discrimination by means of PET with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  F Dehdashti; B A Siegel; L K Griffeth; M J Fusselman; D D Trask; A H McGuire; D J McGuire
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  18F-FDG uptake by metastatic axillary lymph nodes on pretreatment PET/CT as a prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  Bong-Il Song; Sang-Woo Lee; Shin Young Jeong; Yee Soo Chae; Won Kee Lee; Byeong-Cheol Ahn; Jaetae Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET.

Authors:  Garry M McDermott; Andrew Welch; Roger T Staff; Fiona J Gilbert; Lutz Schweiger; Scott I K Semple; Tim A D Smith; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project.

Authors:  Thierry Berghmans; Michèle Dusart; Marianne Paesmans; Claude Hossein-Foucher; Irene Buvat; Catherine Castaigne; Arnaud Scherpereel; Céline Mascaux; Michel Moreau; Martine Roelandts; Stéphane Alard; Anne-Pascale Meert; Edward F Patz; Jean-Jacques Lafitte; Jean-Paul Sculier
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Impact of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response evaluation in patients with high-tumor burden follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy: a prospective study from the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte and GOELAMS.

Authors:  Jehan Dupuis; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Anne Julian; Pauline Brice; Christelle Tychyj-Pinel; Hervé Tilly; Nicolas Mounier; Andrea Gallamini; Pierre Feugier; Pierre Soubeyran; Philippe Colombat; Guy Laurent; Nathalie Berenger; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Pierre Vera; Gaetano Paone; Luc Xerri; Gilles Salles; Corinne Haioun; Michel Meignan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Dynamic and static approaches to quantifying 18F-FDG uptake for measuring cancer response to therapy, including the effect of granulocyte CSF.

Authors:  Robert K Doot; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Paul E Kinahan; Brenda F Kurland; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Prognostic value of FDG PET imaging in patients with laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Tomonori Kanda; Daisuke Miyawaki; Kenji Yoshida; Yasuo Ejima; Ryohei Sasaki; Hirokazu Komatsu; Miki Saito; Naoki Otsuki; Ken-Ichi Nibu; Naomi Kiyota; Tsutomu Minamikawa; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An investigation of the relation between tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) and tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) in oncological FDG PET.

Authors:  Frank Hofheinz; Rebecca Bütof; Ivayla Apostolova; Klaus Zöphel; Ingo G Steffen; Holger Amthauer; Jörg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann; Jörg van den Hoff
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reproducibility and Repeatability of Semiquantitative 18F-Fluorodihydrotestosterone Uptake Metrics in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Metastases: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Gem M Kramer; Andrew M Scott; Andrew Weickhardt; Andreas A Meier; Nicole Parada; Bradley J Beattie; John L Humm; Kevin D Staton; Pat B Zanzonico; Serge K Lyashchenko; Jason S Lewis; Maqsood Yaqub; Ramon E Sosa; Alfons J van den Eertwegh; Ian D Davis; Uwe Ackermann; Kunthi Pathmaraj; Robert C Schuit; Albert D Windhorst; Sue Chua; Wolfgang A Weber; Steven M Larson; Howard I Scher; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Otto S Hoekstra; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kaneta; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Matsuyoshi Ogawa; En-Tao Liu; Hitoshi Iizuka; Tetsu Arisawa; Ayako Hino-Shishikura; Keisuke Yoshida; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.