Literature DB >> 29181254

HIP RANGE OF MOTION IN RECREATIONAL WEIGHT TRAINING PARTICIPANTS: A DESCRIPTIVE REPORT.

Scott Cheatham1, William J Hanney1, Morey J Kolber1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The surveillance of hip injuries and risk factors have become an emerging focus in sports medicine due to the increased recognition of hip pathologies. Researchers suggest that decreased hip range of motion (ROM) is a risk factor for injury in various athletic activities. One under reported population that has potential for hip injuries is recreational weight training (WT) participants. Currently, no studies have reported hip ROM values in WT participants which creates a knowledge gap in this population.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report hip passive ROM values of WT participants to develop reference data for future research on injury patterns and prevention strategies for this population. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive cross sectional study.
METHODS: Two-hundred healthy recreational adult WT participants (age = 27.18 ± 9.3 years, height = 174.84 ± 9.8 cm, mass = 91.0 ± 17.9 kg, body mass index = 29.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were recruited. Bilateral hip passive ROM was assessed for flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, and abduction. Statistical analysis included subject demographics (means and SD) and a two-tailed independent t-test to compare mean passive hip ROM values between sexes and hips. Statistical significance was considered p < .05.
RESULTS: A total of 400 hundred hips (right + left) were measured for this analysis. When comparing hip ROM values within sexes, men had no significant difference (p≥.28) between the right and left hip for all motions. Women did have a significant difference (p≤.05) between the right and left hip for all motions. The right hip had lower values for all motions than the left hip suggesting a more global decrease in right hip ROM. When comparing hip ROM values between men and women, there was a significant difference (p≤.05) between men and women for all motions. Men had lower ROM values for all hip motions when compared to women.
CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation to provide a descriptive analysis of hip ROM in healthy recreational WT participants. These data provide a starting point for clinicians and researchers to further study this population for injury prevention. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; hip joint; injury; mobility; prevention

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181254      PMCID: PMC5685413     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  49 in total

1.  The reliability, minimal detectable change and construct validity of a clinical measurement for identifying posterior shoulder tightness.

Authors:  Morey J Kolber; William J Hanney
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-12

2.  The association between loss of ankle dorsiflexion range of movement, and hip adduction and internal rotation during a step down test.

Authors:  T Bell-Jenje; B Olivier; W Wood; S Rogers; A Green; W McKinon
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-09-21

3.  The relationship between clinically measured hip rotational motion and shoulder biomechanics during the pitching motion.

Authors:  Kevin Laudner; Regan Wong; Takashi Onuki; Robert Lynall; Keith Meister
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.319

4.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.

Authors:  Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Weight-bearing hip rotation range of motion in female golfers.

Authors:  Heather Gulgin; Charles Armstrong; Phillip Gribble
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06

6.  Clinical evaluation of hip joint rotation range of motion in adults.

Authors:  P Kouyoumdjian; R Coulomb; T Sanchez; G Asencio
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Hip and glenohumeral rotational range of motion in healthy professional baseball pitchers and position players.

Authors:  Eric L Sauers; Kellie C Huxel Bliven; Michael P Johnson; Susan Falsone; Sheri Walters
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Biomechanical analysis of the anterior lunge during 4 external-load conditions.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Shelley Lapinski; Lyndsay Smith; George Davies
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Intrarater test-retest reliability of hip range of motion and hip muscle strength measurements in persons with hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yong-Hao Pua; Tim V Wrigley; Tim W Wrigley; Sallie M Cowan; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Hip Range of Motion Is Lower in Professional Soccer Players With Hip and Groin Symptoms or Previous Injuries, Independent of Cam Deformities.

Authors:  Igor Tak; Philip Glasgow; Rob Langhout; Adam Weir; Gino Kerkhoffs; Rintje Agricola
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison between the Dominant and Non-dominant Sides of Athletes with Groin Pain.

Authors:  Guilherme Guadagnini Falótico; André Orlandi Bento; Luana Tossolini Goulart; Leonardo Zafalon; Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Móises Cohen
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-01-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.