| Literature DB >> 29178344 |
Stavros I Tyritzis1,2, N Peter Wiklund1.
Abstract
In 2018, robot-assisted radical cystectomy will enter its 15th year. In an era where an effort is being made to standardize complication reporting and videos of the procedure are readily available, it is inevitable and justified that like everything novel, robot-assisted radical cystectomy should be scrutinized against the gold standard, open radical cystectomy. The present comparison is focused on several parameters: oncological, functional and complication outcomes, and direct and indirect costs. Meta-analysis and prospective randomized trials comparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy have been published, showing an oncological equivalence and in some cases an advantage of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in terms of postoperative morbidity. In the present review, we attempt to update the available knowledge on this debate and discuss the limitations of the current evidence that prevent us from drawing safe conclusions.Keywords: ileal conduit; intracorporeal diversion; neobladder; open; radical cystectomy; robot-assisted
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29178344 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Urol ISSN: 0919-8172 Impact factor: 3.369