Literature DB >> 29696301

[Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion-what is important ?]

J Noldus1, G Niegisch2, A Pycha3,4, A Karl5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Germany, radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is the primary therapeutic option for localized muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Modifications in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative phase have significantly improved outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Different factors and parameters are directly associated with patients' outcome. An overview on how to best approach this procedure is provided in this article.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data regarding preparation and the procedure for the radical cystectomy followed by urinary diversion are separately analyzed.
RESULTS: During the preoperative phase, Fast Track and ERAS (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) concepts should be an integral part of therapeutic management. Different aspects of such models are presented and discussed. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, malnutrition or anemia should also be treated early. In the perioperative phase, optimized fluid management and close interaction with the anesthesiologist are needed. Use of vasopressors during surgery and controlled hypotension (about 80 mm Hg) help reduce perioperative blood loss. Blood product use should be minimized. The use of epidural anesthesia to improve the stress reaction of the body improves pain management and functional recovery. Radical cystectomy is associated with the best oncological outcome, preserving functional structures to maintain a good quality of life. Nerve-sparing procedures in men and women should be used where appropriate. The use of robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is also discussed.
CONCLUSION: The ileum conduit is still the most common urinary diversion worldwide. However, numerous other urinary diversions to provide patients with the highest quality of life are available. Centers with a high case load seem to be associated with an improved outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based medicine; Malignancies; Quality of life; Urethral cancer; Urethral stricture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29696301     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0648-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  33 in total

1.  A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of Doppler optimized intraoperative fluid management on outcome following radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Praveen Pillai; Irene McEleavy; Matthew Gaughan; Christopher Snowden; Ian Nesbitt; Garrett Durkan; Mark Johnson; Joseph Cosgrove; Andrew Thorpe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Bricker versus Wallace anastomosis: A meta-analysis of ureteroenteric stricture rates after ileal conduit urinary diversion.

Authors:  Niall F Davis; John P Burke; Ted McDermott; Robert Flynn; Rustom P Manecksha; John A Thornhill
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  A randomized trial of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Bernard H Bochner; Daniel D Sjoberg; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Dramatic impact of blood transfusion on cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy irrespective of tumor stage.

Authors:  Alexander Buchner; Tobias Grimm; Birte-Swantje Schneevoigt; Georg Wittmann; Alexander Kretschmer; Friedrich Jokisch; Markus Grabbert; Maria Apfelbeck; Gerald Schulz; Christian Gratzke; Christian G Stief; Alexander Karl
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 1.612

5.  Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosis.

Authors:  J Leissner; R Hohenfellner; J W Thüroff; H K Wolf
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Fast-track surgery and technical nuances to reduce complications after radical cystectomy and intestinal urinary diversion with the modified Indiana pouch.

Authors:  Massimo Maffezzini; Fabio Campodonico; Giacomo Capponi; Egi Manuputty; Guido Gerbi
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Effects of age and comorbidity on treatment and survival of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Catharina A Goossens-Laan; Anna M Leliveld; Rob H A Verhoeven; Paul J M Kil; Geertruida H de Bock; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Igle J de Jong; Jan Willem W Coebergh
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Aggressive treatment for bladder cancer is associated with improved overall survival among patients 80 years old or older.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; David C Miller; David Taub; Rodney L Dunn; Willie Underwood; James E Montie; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Updated 2016 EAU Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes; Thierry Lebret; Eva M Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Harman Maxim Bruins; Virginia Hernández; Estefania Linares Espinós; James Dunn; Mathieu Rouanne; Yann Neuzillet; Erik Veskimäe; Antoine G van der Heijden; Georgios Gakis; Maria J Ribal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Long-term outcomes of urinary tract reconstruction in patients with neurogenic urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  E U Johnson; Gurpreet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Google Trends™ Analysis of Bladder Cancer: Determining Awareness Campaign Success, and Patients' Needs in Clinical Management.

Authors:  Aykut Demirci; Berat Cem Özgür
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.