| Literature DB >> 29176786 |
Wajdene Ghouali1, Rachid Tahiri Joutei Hassani1,2, Zoubir Djerada3, Hong Liang1,2,4,5,6, Mohamed El Sanharawi1, Antoine Labbé1,2,4,5,6,7, Christophe Baudouin1,2,4,5,6,7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate a possible clinical application of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) using en-face module for the imaging of the corneoscleral limbus in normal subjects and dry eye patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six subjects were included in this study. Seventy eyes of 35 consecutive patients with dry eye disease and 82 eyes of 41 healthy control subjects were investigated. All subjects were examined with the Avanti RTVue® anterior segment OCT. En-face OCT images of the corneoscleral limbus were acquired in four quadrants (inferior, superior, nasal and temporal) and then were analyzed semi-quantitatively according to whether or not palisades of Vogt (POV) were visible. En-face OCT images were then compared to in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in eleven eyes of 7 healthy and dry eye patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29176786 PMCID: PMC5703550 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1En-face OCT limbal features with corresponding grade.
Palisades of Vogt are clearly identified as a network of radially oriented, channel-like and high reflective features located in the superficial corneoscleral limbus. A shows grade 0 (no visualization of palisades of Vogt) B shows grade 1 (low visualization of palisades of Vogt) C shows grade 2 (intermediate visualization of palisades of Vogt) D shows grade 3 (high visualization of palisades of Vogt).
Fig 2IVCM limbal features with corresponding grade.
Palisades of Vogt are clearly identified as a network of radially oriented, channel-like and high reflective features located in the superficial corneoscleral limbus. A shows grade 0 (no visualization of palisades of Vogt) B shows grade 1 (low visualization of palisades of Vogt) C shows grade 2 (intermediate visualization of palisades of Vogt) D shows grade 3 (high visualization of palisades of Vogt).
Association between OCT score and different factors using multivariate multinomial regression analysis.
| 95% Confidence interval | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Odds ratio | Lower limit | Upper limit | ||
| 0–1 | Severity of dry eye disease | <0.0001 | 0.293 | 0.177 | 0.488 |
| Age | <0.0001 | 0.93 | 0.911 | 0.95 | |
| Dry eye disease | 0.028 | 0.25 | 0.072 | 0.864 | |
| Inferior location | <0.0001 | 62 | 14.3 | >100 | |
| Superior location | <0.0001 | >100 | 22.67 | >100 | |
| 0–2 | Severity of dry eye disease | <0.0001 | 0.058 | 0.027 | 0.123 |
| Age | <0.0001 | 0.868 | 0.842 | 0.896 | |
| Dry eye disease | 0.002 | 0.066 | 0.012 | 0.364 | |
| Inferior location | <0.0001 | >100 | >100 | >100 | |
| Superior location | <0.0001 | >100 | >100 | >100 | |
| 0–3 | Severity of dry eye disease | <0.0001 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.049 |
| Age | <0.0001 | 0.787 | 0.751 | 0.826 | |
| Dry eye disease | 0.004 | 0.018 | 0.001 | 0.275 | |
| Inferior location | <0.0001 | >100 | >100 | >100 | |
| Superior location | <0.0001 | >100 | >100 | >100 | |
Multivariate multinomial analysis shows factors positively or negatively influencing the limbal feature visibility score.
Fig 3Impact of location of the visualization on OCT grade in dry (A) and normal (B) eyes. Data are means ± standard error of the mean. Differences between groups were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. If the P-values were significant, Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test was applied to assess significance between different groups. *** P< 0.001, compared to superior visualization group; &&&P< 0.001, compared to inferior visualization group.
Fig 4Difference in OCT grade between dry and normal eyes considering the location of visualization (superior A, inferior B, nasal C and temporal D). Data are means ± standard error of the mean. Differences between groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test. ** P< 0.01, compared to normal eye group; ***P< 0.001, compared to normal eye group.
Difference in OCT grade between dry and normal eyes considering location of visualization and severity of dryness.
| Location of visualization | Normal eyes | Moderate dry eye disease | Severe dry eye disease |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superior visualization | 2.05 ± 0.06 | 1.81 ± 0.09 | 1.29 ± 0.10 |
| Inferior visualization | 2.19 ± 0.06 | 2.00 ± 0.11 | 1.21 ± 0.10 |
| Nasal visualization | 0.94 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.18 ± 0.06 |
| Temporal visualization | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.09 | 0.29 ± 0.07 |
Data are means ± standard error of the mean. Differences between groups were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. If the P-values were significant, Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test was applied to assess significance between different groups.
***P < 0.001, compared to normal eye group
& P < 0.05, compared to dry eye group (severity: 1, 2)
&& P< 0.01, compared to dry eye group (severity: 1, 2)
&&& P < 0.001, compared to dry eye group (severity: 1, 2).
Comparison of B-scan OCT, en-face OCT and IVCM.
| B-scan OCT | En-face OCT | IVCM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plan of analysis | Transversal | Transversal | Frontal |
| Area of analysis | Adjustable from 1*1 mm to 8*8 mm | Adjustable from 1 to 8 mm | 400*400 μm |
| Examination mode | Non-contact | Non-contact | Contact |
| Image acquisition | Easy, with minimal experience | Easy, with minimal experience | Quite difficult and operator-dependant |
| Axial resolution | 5 μm | 5 μm | 2 μm |
| Transversal resolution | 15 μm | 15 μm | 4 μm |