Joan R Cates1, Jamie L Crandell2, Sandra J Diehl3, Tamera Coyne-Beasley4. 1. School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3365, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3365, United States. Electronic address: JoanCates@unc.edu. 2. School of Nursing and Department of Biostatistics, 2011 Carrington Hall, Campus Box 7460, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7460, United States. Electronic address: jbigelow@email.unc.edu. 3. School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 3365, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3365, United States. Electronic address: diehl@email.unc.edu. 4. NC Child Health Research Network, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, CB # 7225, 231 MacNider, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States. Electronic address: tamera_coyne-beasley@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:HPV vaccination at the recommended ages of 11-12 is highly effective yet has stalled well below the goal of 80% of the population. We evaluated a statewide practice-based communication intervention (tools: brochures, posters, online training for providers and resources for parents, video game for preteens) to persuade parents, preteens and providers to vaccinate against HPV. The 9-month intervention started May 1, 2015. METHODS: We compared vaccine initiation and completion rates over three 9-month periods (baseline, intervention, post-intervention) between practices enrolled in the intervention and a comparable comparison group. All practices reported to the North Carolina Immunization Registry (NCIR) and had at least 100 11- and 12-year-olds who had not completed the HPV vaccine series. Of 175 eligible practices, the 14 intervention practices included 19,398 individuals and the 161 comparison practices included 127,896 individuals. An extended Cox model was used to test the intervention effect. RESULTS: The intervention had a significant effect on both initiation and completion during the intervention and post-intervention periods; the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for initiation was 1.17 (p = .004) during the intervention and 1.11 (p = .005) post-intervention. Likewise, completion during the intervention period was 17% higher in intervention practices, after controlling for baseline differences. This effect increased in the post-intervention period to 30% higher (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in the intervention practices were 17% more likely to initiate and complete HPV vaccination than in the comparison practices during the intervention period and the effect was sustained post-intervention. This intervention is promising for increasing rates of HPV vaccination at ages 11-12.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES:HPV vaccination at the recommended ages of 11-12 is highly effective yet has stalled well below the goal of 80% of the population. We evaluated a statewide practice-based communication intervention (tools: brochures, posters, online training for providers and resources for parents, video game for preteens) to persuade parents, preteens and providers to vaccinate against HPV. The 9-month intervention started May 1, 2015. METHODS: We compared vaccine initiation and completion rates over three 9-month periods (baseline, intervention, post-intervention) between practices enrolled in the intervention and a comparable comparison group. All practices reported to the North Carolina Immunization Registry (NCIR) and had at least 100 11- and 12-year-olds who had not completed the HPV vaccine series. Of 175 eligible practices, the 14 intervention practices included 19,398 individuals and the 161 comparison practices included 127,896 individuals. An extended Cox model was used to test the intervention effect. RESULTS: The intervention had a significant effect on both initiation and completion during the intervention and post-intervention periods; the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for initiation was 1.17 (p = .004) during the intervention and 1.11 (p = .005) post-intervention. Likewise, completion during the intervention period was 17% higher in intervention practices, after controlling for baseline differences. This effect increased in the post-intervention period to 30% higher (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals in the intervention practices were 17% more likely to initiate and complete HPV vaccination than in the comparison practices during the intervention period and the effect was sustained post-intervention. This intervention is promising for increasing rates of HPV vaccination at ages 11-12.
Authors: Mandy A Allison; Laura P Hurley; Lauri Markowitz; Lori A Crane; Michaela Brtnikova; Brenda L Beaty; Megan Snow; Janine Cory; Shannon Stokley; Jill Roark; Allison Kempe Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sarah Reagan-Steiner; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; Laurie D Elam-Evans; C Robinette Curtis; Jessica MacNeil; Lauri E Markowitz; James A Singleton Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; Jennifer L Moss; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Megan E Hall; Parth D Shah; Noel T Brewer Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Tanja Y Walker; Laurie D Elam-Evans; James A Singleton; David Yankey; Lauri E Markowitz; Benjamin Fredua; Charnetta L Williams; Sarah A Meyer; Shannon Stokley Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Joan R Cates; Sandra J Diehl; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Stephen W North; Richard J Chung; Jill Forcina Hill; Tamera Coyne-Beasley Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2020 Mar/Apr
Authors: Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Dea Biancarelli; Emily Jansen; Judith Bernstein; Natalie Joseph; Terresa J Eun; Anny H T R Fenton; Jack A Clark; Amresh Hanchate; Aaron Legler; Thomas J Schuch; Karin Leschly; Rebecca B Perkins Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Joan R Cates; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Laurie L Stockton; Sandra J Diehl; Jamie L Crandell; Tamera Coyne-Beasley Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: Anna Acampora; Adriano Grossi; Andrea Barbara; Vittoria Colamesta; Francesco Andrea Causio; Giovanna Elisa Calabrò; Stefania Boccia; Chiara de Waure Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.390