Literature DB >> 1466614

Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors.

P A Clavien1, J R Sanabria, G Mentha, F Borst, L Buhler, B Roche, R Cywes, R Tibshirani, A Rohner, S M Strasberg.   

Abstract

Results of elective open cholecystectomy in 1252 patients treated in a North American and a European center were examined using a recent standardized classification of complications. Although there were significant differences between centers in population age, rate of concomitant disorders, and numbers of operators, the frequency and severity of complications were comparable. There were no deaths, but 12% and 14% of the patients developed complications in the two centers. About 6% of the patients developed grade I complications. Grade II complications were noted in 6% and 8%, and grade III in 0% and 0.3%. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, individual risk factors for developing complications were found to be different in the two centers. Two preoperative scoring systems, ASA and a simplified APACHE II, were predictive for complications in both centers, but did not account for all risk in these patients. Data from the two centers could not be combined because of significant interaction between risk factors and center. Elective open cholecystectomy is a safe procedure, particularly in terms of highly morbid complications and death. Generalization of risk factors identified in a particular center may be misleading because local conditions may significantly affect risk factors for complications. The data also demonstrate the advantages of a uniform way of reporting surgical complications, which may permit meaningful comparisons among centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1466614      PMCID: PMC1242707          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199212000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  41 in total

Review 1.  Cholecystolithiasis: lithotherapy for the 1990s.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; P A Clavien
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality.

Authors:  R D DRIPPS; A LAMONT; J E ECKENHOFF
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings.

Authors:  W D Owens; J A Felts; E L Spitznagel
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Personal experinces with 1,261 cases of acute and chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis.

Authors:  K A Meyer; N J Capos; A I Mittelpunkt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Analysis of morbidity and mortality rates in right hepatectomy with the preoperative APACHE II score.

Authors:  M Gagner; D Franco; C Vons; C Smadja; R L Rossi; J W Braasch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Cholecystectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  D F Huber; E W Martin; M Cooperman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Risk associated with diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing gallbladder surgery.

Authors:  D B Walsh; F E Eckhauser; S R Ramsburgh; R B Burney
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: a formidable operation.

Authors:  G V Aranha; S J Sontag; H B Greenlee
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Developing trends in acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  F Glenn; L D Dillon
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-10
View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; I Michael Leitman; Elizabeth Heitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Contemporary single-center surgical experiences in redo procedures of the pancreas: improved outcome and reduction of operative risk.

Authors:  Sabine Kersting; Monika Silvia Janot; Ansgar Michael Chromik; Dominique Suelberg; Waldemar Uhl; Matthias Hartmut Seelig
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: an 11-year experience in one institute.

Authors:  Theodoros Diamantis; Christos Tsigris; Andreas Kiriakopoulos; Efstathios Papalambros; John Bramis; Panagiotis Michail; Evangelos Felekouras; John Griniatsos; Theofilos Rosenberg; Nikolaos Kalahanis; Athanassios Giannopoulos; Christos Bakoyiannis; Elias Bastounis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Marco Scatizzi; Katrin C Kröning; Elisa Lenzi; Luca Moraldi; Stefano Cantafio; Francesco Feroci
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-02-01

5.  Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: a look at established paradigms.

Authors:  Stefan Heinrich; Markus Schäfer; Valentin Rousson; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Striving for a better operative outcome: 101 pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  A W C Kow; S P Chan; A Earnest; C Y Chan; K Lim; S Y Chong; K H Lim; C K Ho; S P Chew; K H Liau
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  What is a surgical complication?

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Patients who failed endoscopic stenting for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction suffered the worst outcomes.

Authors:  Tian-Zhi Lim; Dedrick Chan; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Comprehensive complication index for NOTES procedures: results from a randomized controlled trial and comparison to published NOTES complication data.

Authors:  Dietmar H Borchert; Matthias Federlein; Verena A Müller; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Robert M Eisele
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic Gynae-oncological Procedures: Lessons Learnt After a Single Institution Audit of Complications and Their Management in 567 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Geetanjali A Agrawal; Saurabh N Joshi; Neeraj V Rayate; D N B Saravana; Avanish V Deshmukh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.