| Literature DB >> 29165335 |
Jimena Cascales1,2, Mariana Bracco3,4, Mariana J Garberoglio5, Lidia Poggio6,7, Alexandra M Gottlieb8,9.
Abstract
The use of molecular markers with inadequate variation levels has resulted in poorly resolved phylogenetic relationships within Ilex. Focusing on southern South American and Asian species, we aimed at contributing informative plastid markers. Also, we intended to gain insights into the nature of morphological and physiological characters used to identify species. We obtained the chloroplast genomes of I.paraguariensis and I. dumosa, and combined these with all the congeneric plastomes currently available to accomplish interspecific comparisons and multilocus analyses. We selected seven introns and nine IGSs as variable non-coding markers that were used in phylogenomic analyses. Eight extra IGSs were proposed as candidate markers. Southern South American species formed one lineage, except for I. paraguariensis, I. dumosa and I. argentina, which occupied intermediate positions among sampled taxa; Euroasiatic species formed two lineages. Some concordant relationships were retrieved from nuclear sequence data. We also conducted integral analyses, involving a supernetwork of molecular data, and a simultaneous analysis of quantitative and qualitative morphological and phytochemical characters, together with molecular data. The total evidence tree was used to study the evolution of non-molecular data, evidencing fifteen non-ambiguous synapomorphic character states and consolidating the relationships among southern South American species. More South American representatives should be incorporated to elucidate their origin.Entities:
Keywords: character evolution; multilocus phylogenomics; networks and splits graphs; non-coding regions; plastomes; supernetwork
Year: 2017 PMID: 29165335 PMCID: PMC5745560 DOI: 10.3390/life7040047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 1Sequence identity among plastomes of I. paraguariensis, I. dumosa and I. cornuta, using Panax ginseng as the reference. For each species (indicated by its initials), the peaks and valleys depict sequence identity estimated against the reference sequence, between 50% (lower line) and 100% (upper line). The horizontal axis shows the position (in Kbp) along the linear chloroplast. Only some features are indicated in each block for guidance; full maps are shown in Figure S2. Regions with missing data are indicated by empty spaces. Grey arrows above each panel denote transcription sense for each gene. Plastomic regions are colour coded as follows: light blue, protein coding (exons); green, tRNAs genes; violet, rRNA genes; pink, non-coding regions (introns and intergenic spacers).
Figure 2Survey of nucleotide variation of non-coding regions. Histograms showing the normalized ratio expressed as percentage, in orange, and the average uncorrected p-distance, expressed as percentage, in green. The number of Ilex species used is indicated between brackets. * Marks a region selected as in Figure S2; ** mark regions validated with current sampling; ° mark regions selected solely under current sampling. (a) Values estimated from 18 single-loci intron alignments; (b) Values estimated from 30 single-loci IGS alignments.
Figure 3Genetic relationships among 20 Ilex species computed from the multilocus IGS dataset. The species were named using the specific epithet alone, for simplicity. (a) The Maximum Likelihood unrooted phylogram (lnL = −13,104.12) was inferred applying a GTR model [73], and a discrete Gamma distribution was used—with five categories—to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (G = 0.092); all positions with <50% coverage were eliminated, thus 7655 bp were considered. Bootstrap values >50% (500 pseudoreplicates) are shown. Branch lengths are in number of substitutions per site; (b) Neighbour-Net split graph based on uncorrected p-distance. All positions were used to derive the network (7862 bp; fit = 97.36; LSfit = 99.89). The scale bar is in genetic distance units. The numbers indicated the edge weight, which is proportional to the edge length.
Figure 4Integral phylogenetic analyses for Ilex species. The species were named using the specific epithet alone, for simplicity. (a) The supernetwork topology. The scale bar represents edges weights; (b) The total evidence most parsimonious topology for sSA species (score = 1689.06; CI = 0.736; RI = 0.471). Numbers above branches are boostrap/jackkniffe support values; non-ambiguous synapomorphic morphological and phytochemical character state changes (not standardized) are indicated at each internal node.