Literature DB >> 29160776

Proton range verification in homogeneous materials through acoustic measurements.

Wei Nie1, Kevin C Jones, Scott Petro, Alireza Kassaee, Chandra M Sehgal, Stephen Avery.   

Abstract

Clinical proton beam quality assurance (QA) requires a simple and accurate method to measure the proton beam Bragg peak (BP) depth. Protoacoustics, the measurement of the pressure waves emitted by thermal expansion resulting from proton dose deposition, may be used to obtain the depth of the BP in a phantom by measuring the time-of-flight of the pressure wave. Rectangular and cylindrical phantoms of different materials (aluminum, lead, and polyethylene) were used for protoacoustic studies. Four different methods for analyzing the protoacoustic signals are compared. Data analysis shows that, for Methods 1 and 2, plastic phantoms have better accuracy than metallic ones because of the lower speed of sound. Method 3 does not require characterizing the speed of sound in the material, but it results in the largest error. Method 4 exhibits minimal error, less than 3 mm (with an uncertainty  ⩽1.5 mm) for all the materials and geometries. Psuedospectral wave-equation simulations (k-Wave MATLAB toolbox) are used to understand the origin of acoustic reflections within the phantom. The presented simulations and experiments show that protoacoustic measurements may provide a low cost and simple QA procedure for proton beam range verification as long as the proper phantoms and calculation methods are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29160776      PMCID: PMC5845813          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9c1f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of the local dose enhancement in the combination of proton therapy and nanoparticles.

Authors:  I Martínez-Rovira; Y Prezado
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  First clinical application of a prompt gamma based in vivo proton range verification system.

Authors:  Christian Richter; Guntram Pausch; Steffen Barczyk; Marlen Priegnitz; Isabell Keitz; Julia Thiele; Julien Smeets; Francois Vander Stappen; Luca Bombelli; Carlo Fiorini; Lucian Hotoiu; Irene Perali; Damien Prieels; Wolfgang Enghardt; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Experimental characterization of two-dimensional spot profiles for two proton pencil beam scanning nozzles.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Christopher G Ainsley; Timothy D Solberg; James E McDonough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quality assurance of proton beams using a multilayer ionization chamber system.

Authors:  Sandeep Dhanesar; Narayan Sahoo; Matthew Kerr; M Brad Taylor; Paige Summers; X Ronald Zhu; Falk Poenisch; Michael Gillin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Using optoacoustic imaging for measuring the temperature dependence of Grüneisen parameter in optically absorbing solutions.

Authors:  Elena Petrova; Sergey Ermilov; Richard Su; Vyacheslav Nadvoretskiy; André Conjusteau; Alexander Oraevsky
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Metal nanoparticles: a theranostic nanotool against cancer.

Authors:  Harshita Sharma; Pawan K Mishra; Sushama Talegaonkar; Bhuvaneshwar Vaidya
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Experimentally validated pencil beam scanning source model in TOPAS.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Minglei Kang; Timothy D Solberg; Christopher G Ainsley; James E McDonough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Photoacoustic measurement of the Grüneisen parameter using an integrating sphere.

Authors:  Yolanda Villanueva; Erwin Hondebrink; Wilma Petersen; Wiendelt Steenbergen
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.523

10.  Acoustic time-of-flight for proton range verification in water.

Authors:  Kevin C Jones; François Vander Stappen; Chandra M Sehgal; Stephen Avery
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Engineering the Echogenic Properties of Microfluidic Microbubbles Using Mixtures of Recombinant Protein and Amphiphilic Copolymers.

Authors:  Zhuo Chen; Katherine W Pulsipher; Rajarshi Chattaraj; Daniel A Hammer; Chandra M Sehgal; Daeyeon Lee
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 2.  Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Antje Knopf; Lei Dong; Antoni Rucinski; Wei Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Carbon-11 and Carbon-12 beam range verifications through prompt gamma and annihilation gamma measurements: Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Ananta Raj Chalise; Yujie Chi; Youfang Lai; Yiping Shao; Mingwu Jin
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-09-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.