| Literature DB >> 29159934 |
Renée T Fortner1, Helena Schock1, Charlotte Le Cornet1, Anika Hüsing1, Allison F Vitonis2, Theron S Johnson1, Raina N Fichorova3,4, Titilayo Fashemi4, Hidemi S Yamamoto4, Anne Tjønneland5, Louise Hansen5, Kim Overvad6, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault7,8,9, Marina Kvaskoff7,8,9, Gianluca Severi7,8,9,10, Heiner Boeing11, Antonia Trichopoulou12,13, Eleni-Maria Papatesta12, Carlo La Vecchia12,14, Domenico Palli15, Sabina Sieri16, Rosario Tumino17, Carlotta Sacerdote18, Amalia Mattiello19, N Charlotte Onland-Moret20, Petra H Peeters20,21, H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita22,23, Elisabete Weiderpass24,25,26,27, J Ramón Quirós28, Eric J Duell29, Maria-Jose Sánchez30,31, Carmen Navarro31,32, Eva Ardanaz31,33,34, Nerea Larrañaga31,35, Björn Nodin36, Karin Jirström36, Annika Idahl37,38, Eva Lundin39, Kay-Tee Khaw40, Ruth C Travis41, Marc Gunter42, Mattias Johansson42, Laure Dossus42, Melissa A Merritt43, Elio Riboli43, Kathryn L Terry2,3, Daniel W Cramer2,3, Rudolf Kaaks1.
Abstract
CA125 is the best ovarian cancer early detection marker to date; however, sensitivity is limited and complementary markers are required to improve discrimination between ovarian cancer cases and non-cases. Anti-CA125 autoantibodies are observed in circulation. Our objective was to evaluate whether these antibodies (1) can serve as early detection markers, providing evidence of an immune response to a developing tumor, and (2) modify the discriminatory capacity of CA125 by either masking CA125 levels (resulting in lower discrimination) or acting synergistically to improve discrimination between cases and non-cases. We investigated these objectives using a nested case-control study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort (EPIC) including 250 cases diagnosed within 4 years of blood collection and up to four matched controls. Circulating CA125 antigen and antibody levels were quantified using an electrochemiluminescence assay. Adjusted areas under the curve (aAUCs) by 2-year lag-time intervals were calculated using conditional logistic regression calibrated toward the absolute risk estimates from a pre-existing epidemiological risk model as an offset-variable. Anti-CA125 levels alone did not discriminate cases from controls. For cases diagnosed <2 years after blood collection, discrimination by CA125 antigen was suggestively higher with higher anti-CA125 levels (aAUC, highest antibody tertile: 0.84 [0.76-0.92]; lowest tertile: 0.76 [0.67-0.86]; phet = 0.06). We provide the first evidence of potentially synergistic discrimination effects of CA125 and anti-CA125 antibodies in ovarian early detection. If these findings are replicated, evaluating CA125 in the context of its antibody may improve ovarian cancer early detection.Entities:
Keywords: CA125; MUC16; anti-CA125 antibodies; autoantibodies; early detection markers; ovarian cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29159934 PMCID: PMC5805613 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cancer ISSN: 0020-7136 Impact factor: 7.396