Literature DB >> 21372036

Ovarian cancer biomarker performance in prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial specimens.

Daniel W Cramer1, Robert C Bast, Christine D Berg, Eleftherios P Diamandis, Andrew K Godwin, Patricia Hartge, Anna E Lokshin, Karen H Lu, Martin W McIntosh, Gil Mor, Christos Patriotis, Paul F Pinsky, Mark D Thornquist, Nathalie Scholler, Steven J Skates, Patrick M Sluss, Sudhir Srivastava, David C Ward, Zhen Zhang, Claire S Zhu, Nicole Urban.   

Abstract

Establishing a cancer screening biomarker's intended performance requires "phase III" specimens obtained in asymptomatic individuals before clinical diagnosis rather than "phase II" specimens obtained from symptomatic individuals at diagnosis. We used specimens from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial to evaluate ovarian cancer biomarkers previously assessed in phase II sets. Phase II specimens from 180 ovarian cancer cases and 660 benign disease or general population controls were assembled from four Early Detection Research Network or Ovarian Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence sites and used to rank 49 biomarkers. Thirty-five markers, including 6 additional markers from a fifth site, were then evaluated in PLCO proximate specimens from 118 women with ovarian cancer and 474 matched controls. Top markers in phase II specimens included CA125, HE4, transthyretin, CA15.3, and CA72.4 with sensitivity at 95% specificity ranging from 0.73 to 0.40. Except for transthyretin, these markers had similar or better sensitivity when moving to phase III specimens that had been drawn within 6 months of the clinical diagnosis. Performance of all markers declined in phase III specimens more remote than 6 months from diagnosis. Despite many promising new markers for ovarian cancer, CA125 remains the single-best biomarker in the phase II and phase III specimens tested in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21372036      PMCID: PMC3085251          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  25 in total

1.  Death review process in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  A B Miller; S Yurgalevitch; J L Weissfeld
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

2.  Coordination and management of a large multicenter screening trial: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  B O'Brien; L Nichaman; J E Browne; D L Levin; P C Prorok; J K Gohagan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

Review 3.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  I J Jacobs; S J Skates; N MacDonald; U Menon; A N Rosenthal; A P Davies; R Woolas; A R Jeyarajah; K Sibley; D G Lowe; D H Oram
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Multiplexed immunobead-based cytokine profiling for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Elieser Gorelik; Douglas P Landsittel; Adele M Marrangoni; Francesmary Modugno; Lyudmila Velikokhatnaya; Matthew T Winans; William L Bigbee; Ronald B Herberman; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Design and evolution of the data management systems in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  M A Hasson; R M Fagerstrom; D C Kahane; J H Walsh; M H Myers; C Caughman; B Wenzel; J C Haralson; L M Flickinger; L M Turner
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

7.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emanuel F Petricoin; Ali M Ardekani; Ben A Hitt; Peter J Levine; Vincent A Fusaro; Seth M Steinberg; Gordon B Mills; Charles Simone; David A Fishman; Elise C Kohn; Lance A Liotta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Three biomarkers identified from serum proteomic analysis for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Robert C Bast; Yinhua Yu; Jinong Li; Lori J Sokoll; Alex J Rai; Jason M Rosenzweig; Bonnie Cameron; Young Y Wang; Xiao-Ying Meng; Andrew Berchuck; Carolien Van Haaften-Day; Neville F Hacker; Henk W A de Bruijn; Ate G J van der Zee; Ian J Jacobs; Eric T Fung; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Human kallikrein 6 (hK6): a new potential serum biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Diamandis; Andreas Scorilas; Stefano Fracchioli; Marleen Van Gramberen; Henk De Bruijn; Alfthan Henrik; Antoninus Soosaipillai; Linda Grass; George M Yousef; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Marco Massobrio; Ate G J Van Der Zee; Ignace Vergote; Dionyssios Katsaros
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Blood and urine markers for ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Kathryn L Terry; Patrick M Sluss; Steven J Skates; Samuel C Mok; Bin Ye; Allison F Vitonis; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.434

View more
  117 in total

Review 1.  Protein biomarkers of ovarian cancer: the forest and the trees.

Authors:  Brian M Nolen; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Finding ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Hartge; James L Speyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Designing early detection programs for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  N Urban
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Complementary Longitudinal Serum Biomarkers to CA125 for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Archana R Simmons; Evangelia Ourania Fourkala; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Margie N Sutton; Keith Baggerly; Hui Zheng; Karen H Lu; Ian Jacobs; Steven Skates; Usha Menon; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-04-09

5.  An In Vitro Diagnostic Multivariate Index Assay (IVDMIA) for Ovarian Cancer: Harvesting the Power of Multiple Biomarkers.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

6.  Proteomic analyses of human plasma: Venus versus Mars.

Authors:  Christopher C Silliman; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Ernest E Moore; Marguerite R Kelher; Anirban Banerjee; Xiayuan Liang; Kevin J Land; Kirk C Hansen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Cancer: Missing the mark.

Authors:  Lizzie Buchen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Isomer-specific chromatographic profiling yields highly sensitive and specific potential N-glycan biomarkers for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Serenus Hua; Cynthia C Williams; Lauren M Dimapasoc; Grace S Ro; Sureyya Ozcan; Suzanne Miyamoto; Carlito B Lebrilla; Hyun Joo An; Gary S Leiserowitz
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.759

9.  Longitudinal screening algorithm that incorporates change over time in CA125 levels identifies ovarian cancer earlier than a single-threshold rule.

Authors:  Charles W Drescher; Chirag Shah; Jason Thorpe; Kathy O'Briant; Garnet L Anderson; Christine D Berg; Nicole Urban; Martin W McIntosh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The glycolyzer: automated glycan annotation software for high performance mass spectrometry and its application to ovarian cancer glycan biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Scott R Kronewitter; Maria Lorna A De Leoz; John S Strum; Hyun Joo An; Lauren M Dimapasoc; Andrés Guerrero; Suzanne Miyamoto; Carlito B Lebrilla; Gary S Leiserowitz
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.