| Literature DB >> 29158535 |
Kun Zhang1, Yi Chen1, Lijie Liu2, Meng Lu1, Jing Cheng1, Fengbin Gao3, Ningjian Wang1, Zhoujun Shen4, Yingli Lu5.
Abstract
Previous studies have reported that insulin resistant and low testosterone are related. The triglyceride and glucose index (TyG) well mirrors insulin sensitivity. No study investigated the application of TyG in male hypogonadism. We aimed to explore whether TyG was associated with hypogonadism, and also evaluate the ability of TyG compared to HOMA-IR as a possible hypogonadism predictor. A total of 4299 male subjects were enrolled from 22 sites in East China. Hypogonadism was defined as total testosterone <11.3 nmol/L. 695 (16.2%) hypogonadal men had significantly higher TyG index. The prevalence of hypogonadism stepwise increased across increasing TyG quartiles (P < 0.01). TyG was negatively associated with sex hormones and hypogonadism after adjustment for age, current smoking status, hypertension and overweight/obesity (all P for trend <0.01). The full-adjusted odds ratio was 6.1 for the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile of TyG (95% CI 4.51, 8.25, P < 0.001). On ROC curve analysis, a larger area under the curve was found for TyG (0.71, 95% CI 0.69,0.73) than for HOMA-IR (0.68, 95% CI 0.66,0.70). Thus, the TyG was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of hypogonadism in Chinese men. TyG had a better predictive power for hypogonadism than HOMA-IR.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29158535 PMCID: PMC5696537 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16108-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
General characteristics of the study population. Continuous variables are presented as the mean (standard.
| Characteristic | Men without hypogonadism | Men with hypogonadism | P for trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3604 | 695 | |
| Age, years | 54.03 (13.27) | 53.02 (12.26) | 0.06 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.52 (3.21) | 26.48 (3.55) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 83.48 (9.43) | 88.41 (9.91) | <0.001 |
| Fasting blood glucose, mmol/L | 5.62 (1.38) | 6.20 (2.02) | <0.001 |
| Fasting Insulin, mmol/L | 35.49 (41.22) | 55.59 (63.98) | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.35 (2.71) | 2.21 (3.03) | <0.001 |
| TyG | 8.74 (0.60) | 9.26 (0.75) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.70 (1.49) | 2.96 (3.34) | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.12 (0.99) | 5.25 (1.03) | <0.01 |
| Total T, nmol/L | 18.25 (6.37) | 9.16 (4.87) | <0.001 |
| E2, nmol/L | 112.54 (64.77) | 81.53 (50.45) | <0.001 |
| SHBG, nmol/L | 50.29 (25.42) | 28.78 (15.42) | <0.001 |
| FSH, IU/L | 8.90 (7.28) | 9.54 (10.31) | 0.684 |
| LH, IU/L | 5.96 (3.85) | 5.39 (4.35) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 50.6 | 59.6 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 13.0 | 26.6 | <0.001 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 49.3 | 42.6 | <0.01 |
deviation), and categorical variables are expressed as a proportion (%). P for trend was calculated by the Mann-Whitney.
U or Student T test.
Characteristics of the study population according to TyG quartiles. Continuous variables are presented as the mean (standard deviation), and categorical variables are expressed as a proportion (%). P for trend was calculated by ANOVA and Chi-square test.
| Characteristic | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | P for trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤8.35 | 8.36–8.74 | 8.75–9.18 | ≥9.19 | ||
| Age, years | 47.38 (13.95) | 52.98 (12.56) | 56.41 (11.86) | 56.61 (11.56) | 0.23 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.17 (3.00) | 24.32 (3.20) | 25.48 (3.09) | 26.40 (3.09) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 79.69 (8.83) | 82.64 (8.95) | 86.10 (9.17) | 88.95 (8.98) | <0.001 |
| Fasting blood glucose, mmol/L | 5.12 (0.61) | 5.37 (0.73) | 5.67 (1.13) | 6.67 (2.36) | <0.001 |
| Fasting insulin, mmol/L | 26.20 (17.99) | 32.70 (24.84) | 42.67 (40.41) | 52.77 (72.48) | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.87 (0.64) | 1.13 (1.02) | 1.58 (2.01) | 2.37 (4.83) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.81 (0.16) | 1.23 (0.19) | 1.76 (0.34) | 3.73 (3.07) | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.76 (0.34) | 5.00 (0.96) | 5.24 (1.10) | 5.60 (1.16) | <0.001 |
| Total T, nmol/L | 19.50 (6.37) | 17.84 (6.59) | 15.87 (5.15) | 13.80 (4.87) | <0.001 |
| E2, nmol/L | 122.54 (64.77) | 112.82 (65.06) | 108.81 (61.12) | 99.49 (59.55) | <0.001 |
| SHBG, nmol/L | 59.31 (28.78) | 50.76 (26.00) | 43.13 (21.80) | 35.30 (17.40) | <0.001 |
| FSH, IU/L | 10.26 (10.90) | 8.89 (7.00) | 9.22 (8.68) | 8.07 (5.99) | <0.01 |
| LH, IU/L | 6.58 (5.12) | 5.83 (3.49) | 5.86 (4.11) | 5.26 (2.87) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 42.8 | 47.1 | 56.3 | 62.1 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 6.1 | 8.7 | 13.4 | 32.4 | <0.001 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 55.2 | 54.7 | 50.3 | 47.2 | <0.01 |
Figure 1The prevalence of hypogonadism in each quartile of TyG.
Association between TyG index and sex hormones. TyG index:
| Dependent variables | TyG index (Independent variables) | |
|---|---|---|
| Beta coefficients (95% CI) | P value | |
| log-TT | −0.32 (−0.20, −0.17) | <0.001 |
| log-E2 | −0.16 (−0.18, −0.12) | <0.001 |
| log-LH | −0.06 (−0.07, −0.03) | <0.001 |
| log-FSH | −0.04 (−0.06, −0.01) | <0.01 |
| log-SHBG | −0.30 (−0.25, −0.21) | <0.001 |
Ln[triglyceride(mg/dl) × glucose (mg/ dl)/2]. Values were log-transformed to
approximate a normal distribution. Adjusted for age, current smoking status,
hypertension and overweight/obesity. Liner regression analysis was performed.
Figure 2OR of male hypogonadism by TyG index quartile. The data from logistic regression analysis are expressed as odds ratio (95% CI) unless otherwise indicated.
Figure 3AUROCs for diagnostic accuracy of TyG in comparison to other IR indices. The TyG has the largest area under curves among these indices, suggesting TyG can be a promosing predictive index for male hypogonadism.
Comparison of predicting powers between TyG and HOMA-IR for hypogonadism. AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic. P value 1: the diagnostic value for ROC, two tail significance. P value 2: the comparisons of AUC between TyG and other IR indices (Z test).
| Variable | AUROC(95%CI) | P1 value | P2 value |
|---|---|---|---|
| TyG | 0.71 (0.69,0.73) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.68 (0.66,0.70) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Insulin | 0.66 (0.64,0.68) | <0.001 | <0.001 |