| Literature DB >> 26796865 |
Ningjian Wang1, Hualing Zhai1, Bing Han1, Qin Li1, Yi Chen1, Yingchao Chen1, Fangzhen Xia1, Dongping Lin1, Yingli Lu1.
Abstract
Visceral adiposity index (VAI) well mirrors visceral fat dysfunction. No study explored the association between low androgen and VAI. We aimed to determine whether VAI was associated with hypogonadism and sex hormones, and also whether it better predicted hypogonadism than other obesity indices. Our data were collected from 16 sites in East China. 2,759 men were enrolled. Hypogonadism was defined as total testosterone < 11.3 nmol/L. VAI was calculated in male: (waist circumference/(39.68 + (1.88 × BMI)) × (triglycerides/1.03) × (1.31/HDL). 484 (17.5%) hypogonadal men had significantly higher VAI. After adjusting for age, smoking, neck and hip circumference, diabetes and hypertension, VAI was inversely associated with total testosterone, estradiol and SHBG (P < 0.01). Higher quartiles of VAI were associated with significantly increasing odds of hypogonadism (P for trend < 0.01). The fully adjusted odds ratio was 5.88 (95 CI% 4.09, 8.46) for the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile of VAI. Among all the indices investigated, VAI showed the largest area under the curve (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the VAI was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of hypogonadism in Chinese men. VAI also best predicted hypogonadism among obesity indices (waist, hip and neck circumference, BMI, waist-hip ratio and body adiposity index).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26796865 PMCID: PMC4726157 DOI: 10.1038/srep19844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
General characteristics of the participants.
| Men without hypogonadism | Men with hypogonadism | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2275 | 484 | ||
| Age, yr | 53 (14) | 52 (12) | 0.78 |
| Metabolic factors | |||
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.2 (3.2) | 26.1 (3.5) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 82 (9) | 87 (9) | <0.001 |
| Neck circumference, cm | 35.6 (3.1) | 36.8 (2.8) | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference, cm | 93 (6) | 96 (7) | <0.001 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.88 (0.17) | 0.93 (0.46) | <0.001 |
| Body adiposity index, % | 25.0 (3.3) | 26.3 (3.6) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.69 (1.46) | 2.96 (3.26) | <0.001 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.39 (0.31) | 1.27 (0.30) | <0.001 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.92 (0.70) | 2.98 (0.67) | 0.08 |
| Visceral adiposity index | 1.68 (2.00) | 3.26 (4.43) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, % | 39.9 | 49.5 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, % | 10.8 | 23.1 | <0.001 |
| Metabolic syndrome, n (%) | 315 (13.8) | 148 (30.6) | <0.001 |
| Sex hormones | |||
| Total T, nmol/L | 17.6 (5.2) | 9.2 (1.9) | <0.001 |
| E2, pmol/L | 112.2 (65.5) | 83.3 (53.5) | <0.001 |
| SHBG, nmol/L | 49.0 (24.9) | 29.4 (16.4) | <0.001 |
| FSH, IU/L | 8.7 (7.4) | 9.6 (10.8) | 0.66 |
| LH, IU/L | 5.5 (3.7) | 5.1 (4.6) | <0.001 |
| Current smoker, % | 49.2 | 43.3 | <0.05 |
E2, estradiol; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin; T, testosterone.
The data are summarized as the mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables, or as number with proportion for categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney U or Student T test was used for continuous variables, and the Pearson χ2 test was used for dichotomous variables.
Characteristics of the participants by quartiles of visceral adiposity index.
| Visceral adiposity index | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤0.85 | 0.86–1.32 | 1.33–2.17 | ≥2.18 | ||
| 693 | 687 | 691 | 688 | ||
| Age, yr | 54 (15) | 53 (14) | 52 (13) | 51 (12) | <0.001 |
| Metabolic factors | |||||
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 22.6 (3.0) | 24.0 (3.1) | 25.2 (3.1) | 26.2 (3.0) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 77 (8) | 81 (9) | 85 (8) | 88 (8) | <0.001 |
| Neck circumference, cm | 34.4 (2.4) | 35.4 (2.6) | 36.4 (3.8) | 37.0 (2.6) | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference, cm | 91 (6) | 93 (6) | 95 (6) | 96 (6) | <0.001 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.85 (0.07) | 0.90 (0.48) | 0.89 (0.07) | 0.92 (0.06) | <0.001 |
| Body adiposity index, % | 24.1 (3.4) | 24.9 (3.4) | 25.7 (3.4) | 26.1 (3.2) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.84 (0.19) | 1.24 (0.26) | 1.75 (0.38) | 3.84 (3.15) | <0.001 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.64 (0.31) | 1.41 (0.25) | 1.29 (0.23) | 1.14 (0.23) | <0.001 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.69 (0.65) | 2.92 (0.73) | 3.05 (0.67) | 3.05 (0.67) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, % | 35.9 | 40.7 | 40.4 | 49.4 | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, % | 10.5 | 10.0 | 11.0 | 20.3 | <0.001 |
| Sex hormones | |||||
| Total T, nmol/L | 19.0 (6.4) | 16.8 (5.4) | 15.4 (5.2) | 13.3 (4.3) | <0.001 |
| E2, pmol/L | 119.3 (73.0) | 107.2 (60.2) | 103.7 (60.9) | 98.0 (61.1) | <0.001 |
| SHBG, nmol/L | 59.7 (29.2) | 47.9 (22.1) | 40.8 (21.5) | 33.6 (16.8) | <0.001 |
| FSH, IU/L | 10.4 (11.1) | 8.8 (7.2) | 8.6 (6.3) | 7.5 (6.5) | <0.001 |
| LH, IU/L | 6.3 (5.3) | 5.4 (3.5) | 5.1 (3.1) | 4.7 (3.1) | <0.001 |
| Current smoker, % | 44.2 | 43.2 | 51.6 | 53.8 | <0.001 |
E2, estradiol; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin; T, testosterone. The data are summarized as the mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables, or as number with proportion for categorical variables. P for trend was calculated by ANOVA and Chi-square test.
Figure 1The prevalence of hypogonadism by quartiles of visceral adiposity index.
P values were age-adjusted.
Association of visceral adiposity index with sex-related hormones.
| Dependent variables | Visceral adiposity index (independent variable) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Total T | −0.255 (0.042)‡ | −0.212 (0.042)‡ | −0.202 (0.042)‡ |
| E2 | −0.063 (0.483)† | −0.054 (0.492)† | −0.052 (0.495)† |
| log-SHBG | −0.226 (0.001)‡ | −0.170 (0.001)‡ | −0.159 (0.001)‡ |
| log-LH | −0.031 (0.002) | −0.008 (0.002) | −0.009 (0.002) |
| log-FSH | −0.038 (0.002)* | −0.029 (0.002) | −0.032 (0.002) |
Beta coefficients (standard errors) from linear regression models are presented. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01, ‡P < 0.001.
T, testosterone; E2, estradiol; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin.
Model 1 controls for age (continuous variable) and smoking. Model 2 additionally controls for neck and hip circumference (both continuous variables). Model 3 additionally controls for diabetes and hypertension. SHBG, LH and FSH were log-transformed because of their skewed distribution.
Association of visceral adiposity index with hypogonadism.
| Visceral adiposity index | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (≤0.85) | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) |
| Q2 (0.86–1.32) | 1.71 (1.16, 2.52) | 1.61 (1.09, 2.39) | 1.62 (1.09, 2.41) |
| Q3 (1.33–2.17) | 3.06 (2.13, 4.41) | 2.64 (1.81, 3.84) | 2.63 (1.81, 3.84) |
| Q4 (≥2.18) | 7.76 (5.49, 10.96) | 6.33 (4.41, 9.08) | 5.88 (4.09, 8.46) |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
The data are expressed as odds ratio (95% CI) unless otherwise indicated. Logistic regression analysis was used.
Model 1 controls for age (continuous variable) and smoking. Model 2 additionally controls for neck and hip circumference (both continuous variables). Model 3 additionally controls for diabetes and hypertension.
AUC for visceral adiposity index and other adiposity indices for hypogonadism.
| Prediction model | AUC ROC | SE for AUC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visceral adiposity index | 0.71 (0.69, 0.73) | 0.01 | <0.001 | |
| Waist circumference | 0.66 (0.64, 0.67) | 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Neck circumference | 0.63 (0.61, 0.65) | 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference | 0.62 (0.60, 0.64) | 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.63 (0.61, 0.64) | 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Body mass index | 0.66 (0.65, 0.68) | 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.01 |
| Body adiposity index | 0.60 (0.59, 0.62) | 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
P value 1: The diagnostic value for ROC, two tail significance.
P value 2: Difference of AUC compared to the visceral adiposity index model, two tail significance (Z test).
Figure 2Relationship between VAI and hypogonadism in male.
We observed that the VAI was significantly associated with lower total testosterone and hypogonadism. VAI also had the largest area under curves among different obesity indices, indication it best predicted hypogonadism. VAI, visceral adiposity index; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-hip ratio; BMI, body mass index; BAI, body adiposity index. This figure was created by Adobe Illustrator CS5 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, USA).