BACKGROUND: Circulating sex hormone-binding globulin levels are inversely associated with insulin resistance, but whether these levels can predict the risk of developing type 2 diabetes is uncertain. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study of postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Study who were not using hormone therapy (359 with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and 359 controls). Plasma levels of sex hormone-binding globulin were measured; two polymorphisms of the gene encoding sex hormone-binding globulin, SHBG, that were robustly associated with the protein levels were genotyped and applied in mendelian randomization analyses. We then conducted a replication study in an independent cohort of men from the Physicians' Health Study II (170 with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and 170 controls). RESULTS: Among women, higher plasma levels of sex hormone-binding globulin were prospectively associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes: multivariable odds ratios were 1.00 for the first (lowest) quartile of plasma levels, 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.33) for the second quartile, 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.12) for the third quartile, and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.21) for the fourth (highest) quartile (P<0.001 for trend). These prospective associations were replicated among men (odds ratio for the highest quartile of plasma levels vs. the lowest quartile, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.36; P<0.001 for trend). As compared with homozygotes of the respective wild-type allele, carriers of a variant allele of the SHBG single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs6259 had 10% higher sex hormone-binding globulin levels (P=0.005), and carriers of an rs6257 variant had 10% lower plasma levels (P=0.004); variants of both SNPs were also associated with a risk of type 2 diabetes in directions corresponding to their associated sex hormone-binding globulin levels. In mendelian randomization analyses, the predicted odds ratio of type 2 diabetes per standard-deviation increase in the plasma level of sex hormone-binding globulin was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.58) among women and 0.29 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.58) among men, a finding that suggests that sex hormone-binding globulin may have a causal role in the risk of type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Low circulating levels of sex hormone-binding globulin are a strong predictor of the risk of type 2 diabetes in women and men. The clinical usefulness of both SHBG genotypes and plasma levels in stratification and intervention for the risk of type 2 diabetes warrants further examination. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Circulating sex hormone-binding globulin levels are inversely associated with insulin resistance, but whether these levels can predict the risk of developing type 2 diabetes is uncertain. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study of postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Study who were not using hormone therapy (359 with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and 359 controls). Plasma levels of sex hormone-binding globulin were measured; two polymorphisms of the gene encoding sex hormone-binding globulin, SHBG, that were robustly associated with the protein levels were genotyped and applied in mendelian randomization analyses. We then conducted a replication study in an independent cohort of men from the Physicians' Health Study II (170 with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and 170 controls). RESULTS: Among women, higher plasma levels of sex hormone-binding globulin were prospectively associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes: multivariable odds ratios were 1.00 for the first (lowest) quartile of plasma levels, 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.33) for the second quartile, 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.12) for the third quartile, and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.21) for the fourth (highest) quartile (P<0.001 for trend). These prospective associations were replicated among men (odds ratio for the highest quartile of plasma levels vs. the lowest quartile, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.36; P<0.001 for trend). As compared with homozygotes of the respective wild-type allele, carriers of a variant allele of the SHBG single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs6259 had 10% higher sex hormone-binding globulin levels (P=0.005), and carriers of an rs6257 variant had 10% lower plasma levels (P=0.004); variants of both SNPs were also associated with a risk of type 2 diabetes in directions corresponding to their associated sex hormone-binding globulin levels. In mendelian randomization analyses, the predicted odds ratio of type 2 diabetes per standard-deviation increase in the plasma level of sex hormone-binding globulin was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.58) among women and 0.29 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.58) among men, a finding that suggests that sex hormone-binding globulin may have a causal role in the risk of type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Low circulating levels of sex hormone-binding globulin are a strong predictor of the risk of type 2 diabetes in women and men. The clinical usefulness of both SHBG genotypes and plasma levels in stratification and intervention for the risk of type 2 diabetes warrants further examination. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: S Vehkavaara; T Hakala-Ala-Pietilä; A Virkamäki; R Bergholm; C Ehnholm; O Hovatta; M R Taskinen; H Yki-Järvinen Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-11-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P An; T Rice; J Gagnon; Y Hong; A S Leon; J S Skinner; J H Wilmore; C Bouchard; D C Rao Journal: Metabolism Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Alison M Dunning; Mitch Dowsett; Catherine S Healey; Louise Tee; Robert N Luben; Elizabeth Folkerd; Karen L Novik; Livia Kelemen; Saeko Ogata; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; N E Day; Bruce A J Ponder Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Debbie A Lawlor; Roger M Harbord; Jonathan A C Sterne; Nic Timpson; George Davey Smith Journal: Stat Med Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Rafael Simó; Anna Barbosa-Desongles; Cristina Sáez-Lopez; Albert Lecube; Cristina Hernandez; David M Selva Journal: Mol Endocrinol Date: 2012-02-02
Authors: Amanda C Filiberto; Sunni L Mumford; Anna Z Pollack; Cuilin Zhang; Edwina H Yeung; Karen C Schliep; Neil J Perkins; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: A D Coviello; W V Zhuang; K L Lunetta; S Bhasin; J Ulloor; A Zhang; D Karasik; D P Kiel; R S Vasan; J M Murabito Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Mira Aubuchon; Ying Liu; Gregory F Petroski; Tom R Thomas; Alex J Polotsky Journal: Syst Biol Reprod Med Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 3.061
Authors: Brian H Chen; Kathleen Brennan; Atsushi Goto; Yiqing Song; Najib Aziz; Nai-chieh Y You; Melissa F Wellons; JoAnn E Manson; Donna L White; Anthony W Butch; Simin Liu Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 8.327