Literature DB >> 29155227

Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: A survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists.

Archana Radhakrishnan1, Sarah A Nowak2, Andrew M Parker3, Kala Visvanathan4, Craig E Pollack5.   

Abstract

Despite changes to breast cancer screening guidelines intended to decrease screening in younger and older women, mammography rates remain high. We investigated physician attitudes towards screening younger and older women. Surveys were mailed to US primary care providers and gynecologists between May and September 2016 (871/1665, 52.3% adjusted response rate). We assessed physician (1) attitudes towards screening younger (45-49years) and older (75+ years) women and (2) recommendations for routine mammography. We used exploratory factor analysis to identify underlying themes among physician attitudes and created measures standardized to a 5-point scale. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined associations between physician attitudes and screening recommendations. Attitudes identified with factor analysis included: potential regret, expectations, and discordant guidelines (referred to as potential regret), patient-related hazards due to screening, physician limitations and uncertainty, and concerns about rationing care. Gynecologists had higher levels of potential regret compared to internists. In adjusted analyses, physicians with increasing potential regret (1-point increment on 5-point scale) had higher odds of recommending mammography to younger (OR 8.68; 95% CI 5.25-14.36) and older women (OR 4.62; 95% CI 3.50-6.11). Increasing concern for patient-related hazards was associated with decreased odds of recommending screening to older women (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.83). Physicians were more motivated by potential regret in recommending screening for younger and older women than by concerns for patient-related hazards in screening. Addressing physicians' most salient concerns, such as fear of missing cancer diagnoses and malpractice, may present an important opportunity to improving delivery of guideline-concordant cancer screening.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Cancer screening; Guidelines; Gynecology; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29155227      PMCID: PMC5846094          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  35 in total

1.  Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Corbelli; Sonya Borrero; Rachel Bonnema; Megan McNamara; Kevin Kraemer; Doris Rubio; Irina Karpov; Melissa McNeil
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 May-Jun

2.  Provider Attitudes and Screening Practices Following Changes in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Brian L Sprague; Carrie N Klabunde; Anna N A Tosteson; Jane S Chen; Asaf Bitton; Elisabeth F Beaber; Tracy Onega; Jane J Kim; Charles D MacLean; Kimberly Harris; Phillip Yamartino; Kathleen Howe; Loretta Pearson; Sarah Feldman; Phyllis Brawarsky; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Prescription of tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; D Alex Quistberg; Ellyn Micco; Susan Domchek; Carmen Guerra
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-13

4.  Physician Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Following Guideline Changes: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker; Kala Visvanathan; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  A comparison of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) measurement approach with direct observation of outpatient visits.

Authors:  Valerie J Gilchrist; Kurt C Stange; Susan A Flocke; Gary McCord; Claire C Bourguet
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Yulei He; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Jamie S Ostroff; Katherine N DuHamel; Thomas A D'Agostino; Marisol Hernandez; Mollie R Canzona; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  Screening mammography in older women: a review.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; John Pa Ioannidis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  High and low-risk specialties experience with the U.S. medical malpractice system.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Jennifer L Buddenbaum
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  7 in total

1.  Discontinuing Cancer Screening for Older Adults: a Comparison of Clinician Decision-Making for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screenings.

Authors:  Justine P Enns; Craig E Pollack; Cynthia M Boyd; Jacqueline Massare; Nancy L Schoenborn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  Cancer Prevention in Primary Care: Perception of Importance, Recognition of Risk Factors and Prescribing Behaviors.

Authors:  Goli Samimi; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Christine Holmberg; Bethany Tennant; Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard; Kisha I Coa; Shelley S Kay; Leslie G Ford; Eva Szabo; Lori M Minasian
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Using an Agent-based Model to Examine Deimplementation of Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker; Archana Radhakrishnan; Nancy Schoenborn; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Primary care provider perspectives on screening mammography in older women: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sachiko M Oshima; Sarah D Tait; Laura Fish; Rachel A Greenup; Lars J Grimm
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-04-17

5.  Physicians' characteristics and practices associated with the provision of cancer screening advice to their patients: the Spanish SUN cohort study.

Authors:  Carmen Sayon-Orea; Silvia Carlos; Anaïs Rico-Campà; Alejandro Fernández-Montero; Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga; Estefanía Toledo; Stefanos Kales; Miguel Angel Martínez-González
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Scrutinizing screening: a critical interpretive review of primary care provider perspectives on mammography decision-making with average-risk women.

Authors:  Sophia Siedlikowski; Carolyn Ells; Gillian Bartlett
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2018-04-23

Review 7.  Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework.

Authors:  Justin H Lam; Kristen Pickles; Fiona F Stanaway; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.