Literature DB >> 24691609

Screening mammography in older women: a review.

Louise C Walter1, Mara A Schonberg2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Guidelines recommend individualizing screening mammography decisions for women aged 75 years and older. However, little pragmatic guidance is available to help counsel patients.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based approach for individualizing decision-making about screening mammography in older women. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched PubMed for English-language studies in peer-reviewed journals published from January 1, 1990, to February 1, 2014, to identify risk factors for late-life breast cancer in women aged 65 years and older and to quantify the benefits and harms of screening mammography for women aged 75 years and older.
FINDINGS: Age is the major risk factor for developing and dying from breast cancer. Breast cancer risk factors that reflect hormonal exposures in the distant past, such as age at first birth or age at menarche, are less predictive of late-life breast cancer than factors indicating recent hormonal exposures such as high bone mass or obesity. Randomized trials of the benefits of screening mammography did not include women older than 74 years. Thus it is not known if screening mammography benefits older women. Observational studies favor extending screening mammography to older women who have a life expectancy of more than 10 years. Modeling studies estimate 2 fewer breast cancer deaths/1000 women who in their 70s continue biennial screening for 10 years instead of stopping screening at age 69. Potential harms of continued screening over 10 years include false-positive mammograms in approximately 200/1000 women screened and overdiagnosis (ie, finding breast cancer that would not have clinically surfaced otherwise) in approximately 13/1000 women screened. Providing information about life expectancy along with potential benefits and harms of screening may help older women's decision-making about screening mammography. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For women with less than a 10-year life expectancy, recommendations to stop screening mammography should emphasize increased potential harms from screening and highlight health promotion measures likely to be beneficial over the short term. For women with a life expectancy of more than 10 years, deciding whether potential benefits of screening outweigh harms becomes a value judgment for patients, requiring a realistic understanding of screening outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24691609      PMCID: PMC4391705          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.2834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  68 in total

1.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.

Authors:  Virginia L Ernster; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; William E Barlow; Yingye Zheng; Donald L Weaver; Gary Cutter; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Robert Rosenberg; Patricia A Carney; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen H Taplin; Nicole Urban; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens?

Authors:  L C Walter; C Eng; K E Covinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Risk factors for breast cancer in elderly women.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Cindy K Blair; Kristin E Anderson; DeAnn Lazovich; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women.

Authors:  E P McCarthy; R B Burns; K M Freund; A S Ash; M Shwartz; S L Marwill; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert Rosenberg; Carolyn M Rutter; Berta M Geller; Linn A Abraham; Steven H Taplin; Mark Dignan; Gary Cutter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol P McPherson; Karen K Swenson; Martin W Lee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Screening and cognitive impairment: ethics of forgoing mammography in older women.

Authors:  Barrie L Raik; Franklin G Miller; Joseph J Fins
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Beth A Virnig; Sara B Durham; Todd M Tuttle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  74 in total

1.  Screening Mammography Among Older Women: A Review of United States Guidelines and Potential Harms.

Authors:  Deborah S Mack; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Influence of Age, Health, and Function on Cancer Screening in Older Adults with Limited Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Jin Huang; Orla C Sheehan; Jennifer L Wolff; David L Roth; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Review of Breast, Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  Association of Patient Age With Outcomes of Current-Era, Large-Scale Screening Mammography: Analysis of Data From the National Mammography Database.

Authors:  Cindy S Lee; Debapriya Sengupta; Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield; Edward A Sickles; Elizabeth S Burnside; Margarita L Zuley
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Capsule commentary on Schonberg et al., Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Sara L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Communicating About Stopping Cancer Screening: Comparing Clinicians' and Older Adults' Perspectives.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Cynthia M Boyd; Sei J Lee; Danelle Cayea; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2019-05-17

7.  Primary Care-Based Staff Ideas for Implementing a Mammography Decision Aid for Women 75+: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Alicia R Jacobson; Gianna M Aliberti; Michelle Hayes; Anne Hackman; Maria Karamourtopolous; Christine Kistler
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; David Y Johnson; Karen S Johnson; Jay A Baker; Mary Scott Soo; E Shelley Hwang; Sujata V Ghate
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  White-Black Differences in Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival among Adults Aged 85 Years and Older in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Preferences for Communicating about Breast Cancer Screening Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Older Women.

Authors:  Diana S Hoover; Monique R Pappadis; Ashley J Housten; Shilpa Krishnan; Susan C Weller; Sharon H Giordano; Therese B Bevers; James S Goodwin; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.