Literature DB >> 24794545

Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.

Jennifer Corbelli1, Sonya Borrero2, Rachel Bonnema3, Megan McNamara4, Kevin Kraemer5, Doris Rubio5, Irina Karpov6, Melissa McNeil7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for screening mammography changed significantly, and are now in direct conflict with screening guidelines of other major national organizations. The extent to which physicians in different primary care specialties adhere to current USPSTF guidelines is unknown.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey completed by 316 physicians in internal medicine, family medicine (FM), and gynecology (GYN) from February to April 2012. Survey items assessed respondents' breast cancer screening recommendations in women of different ages at average risk for breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to generate response distribution for survey items, and logistic regression models to compare responses among specialties.
FINDINGS: The response rate was 55.0% (316/575). A majority of providers in internal medicine (65%), FM (64%), and GYN (92%) recommended breast cancer screening starting at age 40 versus 50. A majority of providers in internal medicine (77%), FM (74%), and GYN (98%) recommended annual versus biennial screening. Gynecologists were significantly more likely than both internists and family physicians to recommend initial mammography at age 40 (p ≤ .0001) and yearly mammography (p = .0003). There were no other differences by respondent demographic.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers, especially gynecologists, have not implemented USPSTF guidelines. The extent to which these findings may be driven by patient versus provider preferences should be explored. These findings suggest that patients are likely to receive conflicting breast cancer screening recommendations from different providers.
Copyright © 2014 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24794545     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  23 in total

1.  Capsule Commentary on Haas et al., Provider Attitudes and Screening Practices Following Changes in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Alignment of breast cancer screening guidelines, accountability metrics, and practice patterns.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Jennifer S Haas; Asaf Bitton; Charles Brackett; Julie Weiss; Martha Goodrich; Kimberly Harris; Steve Pyle; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Trust and Mistrust in Shaping Adaptation and De-Implementation in the Context of Changing Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Laura E Brotzman; Detric Johnson; Deborah Erwin
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  A mixed methods study: Midlife African American women's knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to well-woman visit, flu vaccine, and mammogram use.

Authors:  Vida Henderson; Jessica M Madrigal; Arden Handler
Journal:  J Women Aging       Date:  2018-11-22

5.  Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; William E Barlow; Marilyn M Schapira; Charles D MacLean; Carrie N Klabunde; Brian L Sprague; Elisabeth F Beaber; Jane S Chen; Asaf Bitton; Tracy Onega; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Xiaofei He; Karen E Schifferdecker; Elissa M Ozanne; Anna N A Tosteson; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Breast cancer screening initiation after turning 40 years of age within the PROSPR consortium.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague; Donald L Weaver; Anne Marie McCarthy; Chyke A Doubeni; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Ann G Zauber; William E Barlow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Call for Development and Validation of Patient-Oriented Shared Decision-Making Tools.

Authors:  Sarina Schrager; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Guidelines for and Against Clinical Preventive Services: Results from a National Survey.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; W Douglas Evans; Holly Mead; Carmen Alvarez; Lisa Stewart
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.