Literature DB >> 27387677

Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013-2016.

Deanna J Attai1,2, Diane M Radford3, Michael S Cowher4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Twitter social media is being used to disseminate medical meeting information. Meeting attendees and other interested parties have the ability to follow and participate in conversations related to meeting content. We analyzed Twitter activity generated from the 2013-2016 American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meetings.
METHODS: The Symplur Signals database was used to determine number of tweets, tweets per user, and impressions for each meeting. The number of unique physicians, patients/caregivers/advocates, and industry participants was determined. Physician tweeters were cross-referenced with membership and attendance rosters. Tweet transcripts were analyzed for content and tweets were categorized as either scientific, social, administrative, industry promotion, or irrelevant.
RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, the number of tweets increased by 600 %, the number of Twitter users increased by 450 %, and the number of physician tweeters increased by 457 %. The number of impressions (tweets × followers) increased from more than 3.5 million to almost 20.5 million, an increase of 469 %. The majority of tweets were informative (70-80 %); social tweets ranged from 13 to 23 %. A small percentage (3-6 %) of tweets were related to administrative matters. There were very few industry or irrelevant tweets.
CONCLUSIONS: Twitter social media use at the American Society of Breast Surgeons annual meeting showed a substantial increase during the time period evaluated. The use of Twitter during professional meetings is a tremendous opportunity to share information. The authors feel that medical conference organizers should encourage Twitter participation and should be educating attendees on the proper use of Twitter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27387677     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  Tweeting the Meeting.

Authors:  Michael T Tanoue; Dhananjay Chatterjee; Heajung L Nguyen; Troy Sekimura; Brian H West; David Elashoff; William H Suh; Janet K Han
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-11

2.  #InSituPathologists: how the #USCAP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology.

Authors:  David Cohen; Timothy Craig Allen; Serdar Balci; Philip T Cagle; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Samson W Fine; Dibson D Gondim; Jennifer L Hunt; Jack Jacob; Kimberly Jewett; Xiaoyin 'Sara' Jiang; Keith J Kaplan; Ibrahim Kulac; Rashna Meunier; Nicole D Riddle; Patrick S Rush; Jennifer Stall; Lauren N Stuart; David Terrano; Ed Uthman; Matthew J Wasco; Sean R Williamson; Roseann I Wu; Jerad M Gardner
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  #EULAR2018: The Annual European Congress of Rheumatology-a Twitter hashtag analysis.

Authors:  José B Negrón
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Social Media and Professional Development for Oncology Professionals.

Authors:  Anusha Chidharla; Audun Utengen; Deanna J Attai; Emily K Drake; G J van Londen; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Elizabeth Henry; Martina Murphy; Maura M Barry; Rami Manochakian; Scott Moerdler; Stacy Loeb; Stephanie L Graff; Yan Leyfman; Michael A Thompson; Merry J Markham
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 5.  Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 6.  The use and impact of Twitter at medical conferences: Best practices and Twitter etiquette.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Ruben A Mesa; Navneet S Majhail; Michael A Thompson
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.851

7.  Trends of social networks in the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress and the Congreso Nacional de Cirugía. Analysis of the #ACSCC20 and #CNCirugia2020.

Authors:  Sergi Sanchez-Cordero; Salvador Morales-Conde; Raquel Sánchez Santos; Inés Rubio Perez; Roser Farré Font; Jose Luis Ramos Rodriguez; José M Balibrea Del Castillo; Julio Mayol
Journal:  Cir Esp (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 8.  Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.

Authors:  Sara Beltrán Ponce; Maura M Barry; Don S Dizon; Matthew S Katz; Martina Murphy; Eleonora Teplinsky; Stacey Tinianov; Deanna J Attai; Merry Jennifer Markham
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.674

9.  Evolving use of social media among Chinese urologists: Opportunity or challenge?

Authors:  Xingbo Long; Lin Qi; Zhenyu Ou; Xiongbing Zu; Zhenzhen Cao; Xiting Zeng; Yuan Li; Minfeng Chen; Zhao Wang; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee.

Authors:  Yonah C Ziemba; Dana Razzano; Timothy C Allen; Adam L Booth; Scott R Anderson; Anne Champeaux; Michael D Feldman; Valerie Fitzhugh; Simone Gittens; Marilea Grider; Mary Gupta; Christina Hanos; Karen Kelly; Tarush Kothari; Jennifer Laudadio; Amy Y Lin; Kamran M Mirza; Kathleen T Montone; Victor G Prieto; Daniel G Remick; Nicole D Riddle; Michael Schubert; Kelley Suskie; Nadeem Zafar; Stanley J Robboy; Priscilla S Markwood
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2020-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.