Deanna J Attai1,2, Diane M Radford3, Michael S Cowher4. 1. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. dattai@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. UCLA Health Burbank Breast Care, Burbank, CA, USA. dattai@mednet.ucla.edu. 3. Breast Services, DDSI, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Twitter social media is being used to disseminate medical meeting information. Meeting attendees and other interested parties have the ability to follow and participate in conversations related to meeting content. We analyzed Twitter activity generated from the 2013-2016 American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meetings. METHODS: The Symplur Signals database was used to determine number of tweets, tweets per user, and impressions for each meeting. The number of unique physicians, patients/caregivers/advocates, and industry participants was determined. Physician tweeters were cross-referenced with membership and attendance rosters. Tweet transcripts were analyzed for content and tweets were categorized as either scientific, social, administrative, industry promotion, or irrelevant. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, the number of tweets increased by 600 %, the number of Twitter users increased by 450 %, and the number of physician tweeters increased by 457 %. The number of impressions (tweets × followers) increased from more than 3.5 million to almost 20.5 million, an increase of 469 %. The majority of tweets were informative (70-80 %); social tweets ranged from 13 to 23 %. A small percentage (3-6 %) of tweets were related to administrative matters. There were very few industry or irrelevant tweets. CONCLUSIONS: Twitter social media use at the American Society of Breast Surgeons annual meeting showed a substantial increase during the time period evaluated. The use of Twitter during professional meetings is a tremendous opportunity to share information. The authors feel that medical conference organizers should encourage Twitter participation and should be educating attendees on the proper use of Twitter.
BACKGROUND: Twitter social media is being used to disseminate medical meeting information. Meeting attendees and other interested parties have the ability to follow and participate in conversations related to meeting content. We analyzed Twitter activity generated from the 2013-2016 American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meetings. METHODS: The Symplur Signals database was used to determine number of tweets, tweets per user, and impressions for each meeting. The number of unique physicians, patients/caregivers/advocates, and industry participants was determined. Physician tweeters were cross-referenced with membership and attendance rosters. Tweet transcripts were analyzed for content and tweets were categorized as either scientific, social, administrative, industry promotion, or irrelevant. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, the number of tweets increased by 600 %, the number of Twitter users increased by 450 %, and the number of physician tweeters increased by 457 %. The number of impressions (tweets × followers) increased from more than 3.5 million to almost 20.5 million, an increase of 469 %. The majority of tweets were informative (70-80 %); social tweets ranged from 13 to 23 %. A small percentage (3-6 %) of tweets were related to administrative matters. There were very few industry or irrelevant tweets. CONCLUSIONS: Twitter social media use at the American Society of Breast Surgeons annual meeting showed a substantial increase during the time period evaluated. The use of Twitter during professional meetings is a tremendous opportunity to share information. The authors feel that medical conference organizers should encourage Twitter participation and should be educating attendees on the proper use of Twitter.
Authors: Michael T Tanoue; Dhananjay Chatterjee; Heajung L Nguyen; Troy Sekimura; Brian H West; David Elashoff; William H Suh; Janet K Han Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-11
Authors: David Cohen; Timothy Craig Allen; Serdar Balci; Philip T Cagle; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Samson W Fine; Dibson D Gondim; Jennifer L Hunt; Jack Jacob; Kimberly Jewett; Xiaoyin 'Sara' Jiang; Keith J Kaplan; Ibrahim Kulac; Rashna Meunier; Nicole D Riddle; Patrick S Rush; Jennifer Stall; Lauren N Stuart; David Terrano; Ed Uthman; Matthew J Wasco; Sean R Williamson; Roseann I Wu; Jerad M Gardner Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Anusha Chidharla; Audun Utengen; Deanna J Attai; Emily K Drake; G J van Londen; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Elizabeth Henry; Martina Murphy; Maura M Barry; Rami Manochakian; Scott Moerdler; Stacy Loeb; Stephanie L Graff; Yan Leyfman; Michael A Thompson; Merry J Markham Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2022-03-21
Authors: Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon Journal: Semin Hematol Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 3.851
Authors: Sergi Sanchez-Cordero; Salvador Morales-Conde; Raquel Sánchez Santos; Inés Rubio Perez; Roser Farré Font; Jose Luis Ramos Rodriguez; José M Balibrea Del Castillo; Julio Mayol Journal: Cir Esp (Engl Ed) Date: 2021-05-05
Authors: Sara Beltrán Ponce; Maura M Barry; Don S Dizon; Matthew S Katz; Martina Murphy; Eleonora Teplinsky; Stacey Tinianov; Deanna J Attai; Merry Jennifer Markham Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 3.674
Authors: Yonah C Ziemba; Dana Razzano; Timothy C Allen; Adam L Booth; Scott R Anderson; Anne Champeaux; Michael D Feldman; Valerie Fitzhugh; Simone Gittens; Marilea Grider; Mary Gupta; Christina Hanos; Karen Kelly; Tarush Kothari; Jennifer Laudadio; Amy Y Lin; Kamran M Mirza; Kathleen T Montone; Victor G Prieto; Daniel G Remick; Nicole D Riddle; Michael Schubert; Kelley Suskie; Nadeem Zafar; Stanley J Robboy; Priscilla S Markwood Journal: Acad Pathol Date: 2020-07-17