Literature DB >> 29150720

Assessing Restoration Effects on River Hydromorphology Using the Process-based Morphological Quality Index in Eight European River Reaches.

B Belletti1,2, L Nardi3, M Rinaldi3, M Poppe4, K Brabec5, M Bussettini6, F Comiti7, M Gielczewski8, B Golfieri9, S Hellsten10, J Kail11, E Marchese7, P Marcinkowski8, T Okruszko8, A Paillex12, M Schirmer13, M Stelmaszczyk8, N Surian9.   

Abstract

The Morphological Quality Index (MQI) and the Morphological Quality Index for monitoring (MQIm) have been applied to eight case studies across Europe with the objective of analyzing the hydromorphological response to various restoration measures and of comparing the results of the MQI and MQIm as a morphological assessment applied at the reach scale, with a conventional site scale physical-habitat assessment method. For each restored reach, the two indices were applied to the pre-restoration and post-restoration conditions. The restored reach was also compared to an adjacent, degraded reach. Results show that in all cases the restoration measures improved the morphological quality of the reach, but that the degree of improvement depends on many factors, including the initial morphological conditions, the length of the restored portion in relation to the reach length, and on the type of intervention. The comparison with a conventional site scale physical-habitat assessment method shows that the MQI and MQIm are best suited for the evaluation of restoration effects on river hydromorphology at the geomorphologically-relevant scale of the river reach.

Keywords:  Fluvial geomorphology; Human impact; Hydromorphological assessment; Hydromorphological monitoring; River restoration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29150720     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0961-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Don't fight the site: three geomorphic considerations in catchment-scale river rehabilitation planning.

Authors:  Gary Brierley; Kirstie Fryirs
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis.

Authors:  C W Osenberg; O Sarnelle; S D Cooper
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  What are we monitoring and why? Using geomorphic principles to frame eco-hydrological assessments of river condition.

Authors:  Gary Brierley; Helen Reid; Kirstie Fryirs; Nadine Trahan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams.

Authors:  M Rinaldi; B Belletti; M Bussettini; F Comiti; B Golfieri; B Lastoria; E Marchese; L Nardi; N Surian
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects.

Authors:  Bertrand Morandi; Hervé Piégay; Nicolas Lamouroux; Lise Vaudor
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 6.789

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.