Literature DB >> 27889363

New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams.

M Rinaldi1, B Belletti2, M Bussettini3, F Comiti4, B Golfieri5, B Lastoria3, E Marchese4, L Nardi2, N Surian5.   

Abstract

Hydromorphological stream assessment has significantly expanded over the last years, but a need has emerged from recent reviews for more comprehensive, process-based methods that consider the character and dynamics of the river with greater accuracy. With this as a focus, a series of hydromorphological tools have been developed and/or further extended in Europe within the context of the REFORM (REstoring rivers FOR effective catchment Management) project. The aim of this paper is to present the set of REFORM hydromorphological assessment methods and, based on some examples of their application, to illustrate and discuss their synergic use, specific features, limitations and strengths. This assessment and monitoring includes three tools: the Morphological Quality Index (MQI), the Morphological Quality Index for monitoring (MQIm), and the Geomorphic Units survey and classification System (GUS). These tools constitute the assessment phase of an overall multi-scale, process-based hydromorphological framework developed in REFORM. The MQI is aimed at an assessment, classification and monitoring of the current morphological state; the MQIm aims at monitoring the tendency of morphological conditions (enhancement or deterioration); the GUS provides a characterization, classification and monitoring of geomorphic units. A series of examples are used to illustrate the potential range of application, including: (i) an assessment of morphological conditions; (ii) an assessment of the morphological effects of restoration projects; (iii) an evaluation of the geomorphic impacts of interventions for risk mitigation; and (iv) an integrated use of MQI and GUS to assess and characterise morphological conditions. Finally, some of the main features, strengths and peculiarities of the three hydromorphological tools are discussed with the support of examples of their application.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Hydromorphology; River management; River restoration; Water Framework Directive

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889363     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  Assessing Restoration Effects on River Hydromorphology Using the Process-based Morphological Quality Index in Eight European River Reaches.

Authors:  B Belletti; L Nardi; M Rinaldi; M Poppe; K Brabec; M Bussettini; F Comiti; M Gielczewski; B Golfieri; S Hellsten; J Kail; E Marchese; P Marcinkowski; T Okruszko; A Paillex; M Schirmer; M Stelmaszczyk; N Surian
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Towards a Transferable UAV-Based Framework for River Hydromorphological Characterization.

Authors:  Mónica Rivas Casado; Rocío Ballesteros González; José Fernando Ortega; Paul Leinster; Ros Wright
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Engaging with research impact assessment for an environmental science case study.

Authors:  Kirstie A Fryirs; Gary J Brierley; Thom Dixon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Environmental drivers of dynamic soil erosion change in a Mediterranean fluvial landscape.

Authors:  Nazzareno Diodato; Francesco Fiorillo; Massimo Rinaldi; Gianni Bellocchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.