Literature DB >> 19301067

Don't fight the site: three geomorphic considerations in catchment-scale river rehabilitation planning.

Gary Brierley1, Kirstie Fryirs.   

Abstract

Three geomorphic considerations that underpin the design and implementation of realistic and strategic river conservation and rehabilitation programs that work with the nature are outlined. First, the importance of appreciating the inherent diversity of river forms and processes is discussed. Second, river dynamics are appraised, framing the contemporary behavioral regime of a reach in relation to system evolution to explain changes to river character and behavior over time. Third, the trajectory of a reach is framed in relation to downstream patterns of river types, analyzing landscape connectivity at the catchment scale to interpret geomorphic river recovery potential. The application of these principles is demonstrated using extensive catchment-scale analyses of geomorphic river responses to human disturbance in the Bega and Upper Hunter catchments in southeastern Australia. Differing implications for reach- and catchment-scale rehabilitation planning prompt the imperative that management practices work with nature rather than strive to 'fight the site.'

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19301067     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9266-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  River Styles, a Geomorphic Approach to Catchment Characterization: Implications for River Rehabilitation in Bega Catchment, New South Wales, Australia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream.

Authors:  G M Kondolf; M W Smeltzer; S F Railsback
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

Authors:  Stuart E Bunn; Angela H Arthington
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Investing in sustainable catchments.

Authors:  Mark Everard
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Understanding stream geomorphic state in relation to ecological integrity: evidence using habitat assessments and macroinvertebrates.

Authors:  S Mazeika P Sullivan; Mary C Watzin; W Cully Hession
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills.

Authors:  Robert C Walter; Dorothy J Merritts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Geology. Dreams of natural streams.

Authors:  David R Montgomery
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.

Authors:  David Dudgeon; Angela H Arthington; Mark O Gessner; Zen-Ichiro Kawabata; Duncan J Knowler; Christian Lévêque; Robert J Naiman; Anne-Hélène Prieur-Richard; Doris Soto; Melanie L J Stiassny; Caroline A Sullivan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-12-12

9.  Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach.

Authors:  B A Bohn; J L Kershner
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.789

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Inventory of Long-Term Braiding Activity at a Regional Scale as a Tool for Detecting Alterations to a Rivers' Hydromorphological State: A Case Study for Romania's South-Eastern Subcarpathians.

Authors:  Gabriela Ioana-Toroimac
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Assessing Restoration Effects on River Hydromorphology Using the Process-based Morphological Quality Index in Eight European River Reaches.

Authors:  B Belletti; L Nardi; M Rinaldi; M Poppe; K Brabec; M Bussettini; F Comiti; M Gielczewski; B Golfieri; S Hellsten; J Kail; E Marchese; P Marcinkowski; T Okruszko; A Paillex; M Schirmer; M Stelmaszczyk; N Surian
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Things we can do now that we could not do before: Developing and using a cross-scalar, state-wide database to support geomorphologically-informed river management.

Authors:  Kirstie Fryirs; Fergus Hancock; Michael Healey; Simon Mould; Lucy Dobbs; Marcus Riches; Allan Raine; Gary Brierley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Identifying corridors of river recovery in coastal NSW Australia, for use in river management decision support and prioritisation systems.

Authors:  Danelle Agnew; Kirstie Fryirs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Making Stream Restoration More Sustainable: A Geomorphically, Ecologically, and Socioeconomically Principled Approach to Bridge the Practice with the Science.

Authors:  Robert J Hawley
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 8.589

6.  A process-based assessment of landscape change and salmon habitat losses in the Chehalis River basin, USA.

Authors:  Timothy J Beechie; Caleb Fogel; Colin Nicol; Britta Timpane-Padgham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.