Literature DB >> 26506254

Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes.

Andrew T Marshall1, Kimberly Kirkpatrick2.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relationship between reward processing and impulsive choice. In Experiment 1, rats chose between a smaller-sooner (SS) reward (1 pellet, 10 s) and a larger-later (LL) reward (1, 2, and 4 pellets, 30 s). The rats then experienced concurrent variable-interval 30-s schedules with variations in reward magnitude to evaluate reward magnitude discrimination. LL choice behavior positively correlated with reward magnitude discrimination. In Experiment 2, rats chose between an SS reward (1 pellet, 10 s) and an LL reward (2 and 4 pellets, 30 s). The rats then received either a reward intervention which consisted of concurrent fixed-ratio schedules associated with different magnitudes to improve their reward magnitude discrimination, or a control task. All rats then experienced a post-intervention impulsive choice task followed by a reward magnitude discrimination task to assess intervention efficacy. The rats that received the intervention exhibited increases in post-intervention LL choice behavior, and made more responses for larger-reward magnitudes in the reward magnitude discrimination task, suggesting that the intervention heightened sensitivities to reward magnitude. The results suggest that reward magnitude discrimination plays a key role in individual differences in impulsive choice, and could be a potential target for further intervention developments.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choice behavior; Impulsive behavior; Individual differences; Rats; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26506254      PMCID: PMC4729665          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  69 in total

1.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes.

Authors:  L Green; J Myerson; P Ostaszewski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies.

Authors:  J B HALDANE
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  Building blocks of self-control: increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards.

Authors:  George Ainslie; John R Monterosso
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude.

Authors:  Forest Baker; Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2003-08

8.  Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD).

Authors:  R A Barkley; G Edwards; M Laneri; K Fletcher; L Metevia
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2001-12

9.  Preference reversals with food and water reinforcers in rats.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Sara J Estle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Impulsive choice induced in rats by lesions of the nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  R N Cardinal; D R Pennicott; C L Sugathapala; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.

Authors:  Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson; Andrew T Marshall; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.

Authors:  Travis Smith; Kelsey Panfil; Carrie Bailey; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Reward Contrast Effects on Impulsive Choice and Timing in Rats.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Jennifer R Peterson; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Timing Time Percept       Date:  2016

4.  Dietary effects on the determinants of food choice: Impulsive choice, discrimination, incentive motivation, preference, and liking in male rats.

Authors:  Catherine C Steele; Jesseca R A Pirkle; Ian R Davis; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Generalizability of time-based interventions: Effects of choice procedure and smaller-sooner delay.

Authors:  Travis R Smith; Kelsey Panfil; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  I can't wait: Methods for measuring and moderating individual differences in impulsive choice.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Catherine C Hill; Andrew T Marshall; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Agric Food Ind Organ       Date:  2015-11-19

Review 7.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

8.  The effects of a time-based intervention on experienced middle-aged rats.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Differential reinforcement of low rates differentially decreased timing precision.

Authors:  Matthew L Eckard; Elizabeth G E Kyonka
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 1.777

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.