Literature DB >> 27241200

The anova to mixed model transition.

Matthieu P Boisgontier1, Boris Cheval2.   

Abstract

A transition towards mixed models is underway in science. This transition started up because the requirements for using analyses of variances are often not met and mixed models clearly provide a better framework. Neuroscientists have been slower than others in changing their statistical habits and are now urged to act.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Analysis of variance; Linear mixed-effects models; Neuroscience; Statistics

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27241200     DOI： 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN： 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  82 in total

1.  Effects of monoaminergic drugs on training-induced motor cortex plasticity in older adults.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; Samir R Belagaje; Paola Pergami; Marc W Haut; Gerald Hobbs; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Effect of expressive and neutral writing on respiratory sinus arrhythmia response over time.

Authors:  Christina M Sheerin; Andrea Konig; Alison M Eonta; Scott R Vrana
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-16

Review 3.  Valid statistical approaches for analyzing sholl data: Mixed effects versus simple linear models.

Authors:  Machelle D Wilson; Sunjay Sethi; Pamela J Lein; Kimberly P Keil
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  The Effects of Multi-Component Exercise Training on Cognitive Functioning and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults.

Authors:  Navin Kaushal; Laurence Desjardins-Crépeau; Francis Langlois; Louis Bherer
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-12

5.  Intracerebellar cannabinoid administration impairs delay but not trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Differential effects of social and novelty enrichment on individual differences in impulsivity and behavioral flexibility.

Authors:  Maya Zhe Wang; Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Resurrecting the individual in behavioral analysis: Using mixed effects models to address nonsystematic discounting data.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2018-06-18

8.  Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.

Authors:  Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson; Andrew T Marshall; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Durability and generalizability of time-based intervention effects on impulsive choice in rats.

Authors:  Carrie Bailey; Jennifer R Peterson; Aaron Schnegelsiepen; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Non-specific binding and steric hindrance thresholds for penetration of particulate drug carriers within tumor tissue.

Authors:  Jimena G Dancy; Aniket S Wadajkar; Craig S Schneider; Joseph R H Mauban; Olga G Goloubeva; Graeme F Woodworth; Jeffrey A Winkles; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 9.776
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.