Yan Qin1, Xiaohong Han1, Lin Wang1, Ping Du1, Jiarui Yao1, Di Wu1, Yuanyuan Song1, Shuxiang Zhang1, Le Tang1, Yuankai Shi1. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The recommended dose of prophylactic pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG rhG-CSF) is 100 μg/kg once per cycle for patients receiving intense-dose chemotherapy. However, few data are available on the proper dose for patients receiving less-intense chemotherapy. The aim of this phase I study is to explore the proper dose and administration schedule of PEG rhG-CSF for patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients received 3-cycle chemotherapy every 3 weeks. No PEG rhG-CSF was given in the first cycle. Patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia would then enter the cycle 2 and 3. In cycle 2, patients received a single subcutaneous injection of prophylactic PEG rhG-CSF on d 3, and received half-dose subcutaneous injection in cycle 3 on d 3 and d 5, respectively. Escalating doses (30, 60, 100 and 200 μg/kg) of PEG rhG-CSF were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were enrolled and received chemotherapy, in which 24 and 18 patients entered cycle 2 and cycle 3 treatment, respectively. In cycle 2, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia for patients receiving single-dose PEG rhG-CSF of 30, 60, 100 and 200 μg/kg was 66.67%, 33.33%, 22.22% and 0, respectively, with a median duration less than 1 (0-2) d. No grade 3 or higher neutropenia was noted in cycle 3 in all dose cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of PEG rhG-CSF used in cancer patients were similar to those reported, as well as the safety. Double half dose administration model showed better efficacy result than a single dose model in terms of grade 3 neutropenia and above. The single dose of 60 μg/kg, 100 μg/kg and double half dose of 30 μg/kg were recommended to the phase II study, hoping to find a preferable method for neutropenia treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The recommended dose of prophylactic pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG rhG-CSF) is 100 μg/kg once per cycle for patients receiving intense-dose chemotherapy. However, few data are available on the proper dose for patients receiving less-intense chemotherapy. The aim of this phase I study is to explore the proper dose and administration schedule of PEG rhG-CSF for patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients received 3-cycle chemotherapy every 3 weeks. No PEG rhG-CSF was given in the first cycle. Patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia would then enter the cycle 2 and 3. In cycle 2, patients received a single subcutaneous injection of prophylactic PEG rhG-CSF on d 3, and received half-dose subcutaneous injection in cycle 3 on d 3 and d 5, respectively. Escalating doses (30, 60, 100 and 200 μg/kg) of PEG rhG-CSF were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were enrolled and received chemotherapy, in which 24 and 18 patients entered cycle 2 and cycle 3 treatment, respectively. In cycle 2, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia for patients receiving single-dose PEG rhG-CSF of 30, 60, 100 and 200 μg/kg was 66.67%, 33.33%, 22.22% and 0, respectively, with a median duration less than 1 (0-2) d. No grade 3 or higher neutropenia was noted in cycle 3 in all dose cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of PEG rhG-CSF used in cancer patients were similar to those reported, as well as the safety. Double half dose administration model showed better efficacy result than a single dose model in terms of grade 3 neutropenia and above. The single dose of 60 μg/kg, 100 μg/kg and double half dose of 30 μg/kg were recommended to the phase II study, hoping to find a preferable method for neutropenia treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
PEG rhG-CSF; Phase I study; chemotherapy; dose-finding; neutropenia
Authors: F A Holmes; J A O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; S E Jones; J Shogan; M Savin; J Glaspy; M Moore; L Meza; I Wiznitzer; T A Neumann; L R Hill; B C Liang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Julia-Tatjana Maul; Frank Stenner-Liewen; Burkhardt Seifert; Sarah Pfrommer; Ulf Petrausch; Michael K Kiessling; Urs Schanz; Gayathri Nair; Axel Mischo; Christian Taverna; Adrian Schmidt; Mario Bargetzi; Roger Stupp; Christoph Renner; Panagiotis Samaras Journal: J Clin Apher Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 2.821
Authors: Georgia Kourlaba; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Dimitrios Pectasides; Dimosthenis V Skarlos; Helen Gogas; George Pentheroudakis; Angelos Koutras; George Fountzilas; Nikos Maniadakis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: F A Holmes; S E Jones; J O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; T George; M Savin; D Richards; J Glaspy; L Meza; G Cohen; M Dhami; D R Budman; J Hackett; M Brassard; B B Yang; B C Liang Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Claudio Cerchione; Lucio Catalano; Ilaria Peluso; Davide Nappi; Maria Di Perna; Dalila Salvatore; Ilaria Migliaccio; Marco Picardi; Fabrizio Pane Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: John Lally; Steffi Malik; Eromona Whiskey; David M Taylor; Fiona P Gaughran; Amir Krivoy; Robert J Flanagan; Aleksandar Mijovic; James H MacCabe Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.153