Literature DB >> 23571496

Pegylated filgrastim is comparable with filgrastim as support for commonly used chemotherapy regimens: a multicenter, randomized, crossover phase 3 study.

Yuan-Kai Shi1, Qiang Chen, Yun-Zhong Zhu, Xiao-Hui He, Hua-Qing Wang, Ze-Fei Jiang, Jian Hua Chang, Yun-Peng Liu, An-Lan Wang, De-Yun Luo, Yang Zhang, Xiao-Yan Ke, Wei-Lian Li, Wei-Jing Zhang, Xiu-Wen Wang, Yi-Ping Zhang, Jian-Min Wang, Xiao-Qing Liu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim with daily filgrastim as a prophylaxis for neutropenia induced by commonly used chemotherapy regimens. Fifteen centers enrolled 337 chemotherapy-naive cancer patients with normal bone marrow function. All patients randomized into AOB and BOA arms received two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients received a single dose of pegylated filgrastim 100 µg/kg in cycle 1 (AOB) or cycle 2 (BOA) and daily doses of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/day in cycle 1 (BOA) or cycle 2 (AOB). Efficacy and safety parameters were recorded. The primary end point was the rate of protection against grade 4 neutropenia after chemotherapy [defined as the rate at which the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) remained >0.5×10(9)/l throughout the entire cycle]. Ninety-four percent of patients receiving pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim did not develop grade 4 neutropenia. The incidence of ANC<1.0×10(9)/l was 16.0% (50/313) after support with either pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim. The incidences of febrile neutropenia and antibiotic administration were similar in both groups. Notably, faster ANC recovery was observed with pegylated filgrastim support. The ANC nadir was also earlier with pegylated filgrastim (day 7) support than with filgrastim support (day 9), although the depth of nadir was not significantly different. A single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim 100 μg/kg provided adequate and safe neutrophil support comparable with daily subcutaneous injections of unmodified filgrastim 5 μg/kg/day in patients receiving commonly used standard-dose mild-to-moderate myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23571496     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283610b5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  11 in total

1.  An open-label, randomized, multicenter dose-finding study of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Zhiwei Jiang; Ling Wang; Chanjuan Li; Jielai Xia
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Mecapegfilgrastim in Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: A Profile of Its Use in China.

Authors:  Zaina T Al-Salama; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PegaGen® (pegfilgrastim) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a post-marketing surveillance study.

Authors:  Arash Jenabian; Ali Ehsanpour; Seyed Mohammad Reza Mortazavizadeh; Jahangir Raafat; Mohsen Razavi; Adnan Khosravi; Sharareh Seifi; Babak Salimi; Nassim Anjidani; Hamidreza Kafi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  A phase I study of different doses and frequencies of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG rhG-CSF) in patients with standard-dose chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  Yan Qin; Xiaohong Han; Lin Wang; Ping Du; Jiarui Yao; Di Wu; Yuanyuan Song; Shuxiang Zhang; Le Tang; Yuankai Shi
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Medical management of lung cancer: Experience in China.

Authors:  Yuankai Shi; Yan Sun
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events.

Authors:  T Christopher Bond; Erika Szabo; Susan Gabriel; Jean Klastersky; Omar Tomey; Udo Mueller; Lee Schwartzberg; Boxiong Tang
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 1.809

7.  Clinical utility of polyethylene glycol conjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) for preventing severe neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Yusuke Kitagawa; Hiroki Osumi; Eiji Shinozaki; Yumiko Ota; Izuma Nakayama; Takeshi Suzuki; Takeru Wakatsuki; Mariko Ogura; Akira Ooki; Daisuke Takahari; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Keisho Chin; Kensei Yamaguchi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Is PEGylated G-CSF superior to G-CSF in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Huan Zheng; Man-Cheng Yu; Wei Wang; Xin-Hong Wu; Dong-Mei Yang; Juan Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.359

9.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia.

Authors:  Paul Cornes; Pere Gascon; Stephen Chan; Khalid Hameed; Catherine R Mitchell; Polly Field; Mark Latymer; Luiz H Arantes
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Lin Chen; Fen Liu; Ning Zhao; Liyao Xu; Biqi Fu; Yong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.