Literature DB >> 29138919

Low re-rupture rate with BPTB autograft and semitendinosus gracilis autograft with preserved insertions in ACL reconstruction surgery in sports persons.

Ravi Gupta1, Munish Sood2, Anubhav Malhotra2, Gladson David Masih2, Anil Kapoor2, Mukta Raghav2, Mehar Dhillon2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the results of bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (BPTB), semitendinosus-gracilis graft with preserved insertions (STGPI) and semitendinosus-gracilis-free graft (STGF) in terms of graft failure, objective mechanical stability, functional outcome, and return to sports in elite and recreational sports persons. It was hypothesized that the STGPI graft provided superior outcome as compared to the other two grafts.
METHODS: Two hundred and forty-nine elite and recreational players who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery, with BPTB graft (N = 80), STGPI graft (N = 85), and STGF graft (N = 84) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, were assessed using clinical tests, knee arthrometer (KT 1000™), single-leg hop test, Lysholm knee score, Tegner's activity scale, and return to sports. Groups were matched in terms of age, gender, mode of injury, side involved, the level of sports, associated injuries, and mean follow-up.
RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 24 years (range 16-46 years), with 227 males and 22 females, with a mean follow-up of 61.8 ± 25.9 months. At the final follow-up, the mean side-to-side difference by KT 1000™ was significantly superior in BPTB group (1.4 ± 2.1 mm) as compared to STGPI (1.9 ± 2.0 mm) and STGF group (2.5 ± 2.0 mm) (p = 0.002). The mean Lysholm knee score, Limb symmetry index (LSI) using single-leg hop test and the mean difference in pre-injury and post-surgery level of Tegner's activity scale were not significantly different. The rate of graft failure was significantly higher in STGF group (7.1%) as compared to BPTB (1.2%) and STGPI (1.2%) groups (p = 0.043).
CONCLUSION: BPTB graft is a better graft in terms of mechanical stability than STGPI and STGF grafts. STGPI graft and BPTB graft are superior to STGF graft in terms of graft failure rate. However, there is no statistically significant difference amongst the three grafts in terms of return to sports and clinical tests of instability. STGPI graft is another option in the clinical setting with low graft failure rate like that of BPTB graft and with the added advantage of not having significant donor site morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; BPTB graft; STG graft with preserved insertions; STG-free graft

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29138919     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4790-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

1.  Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Bent Lund; Torsten Nielsen; Peter Faunø; Svend Erik Christiansen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: does delay in index surgery affect outcome in recreational athletes.

Authors:  A D Tambe; S P Godsiff; S Mulay; M Joshi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young athlete: a retrospective matched analysis with 2-10 year follow-up.

Authors:  Randy Mascarenhas; Michael J Tranovich; Eric J Kropf; Freddie H Fu; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years.

Authors:  Xiaobo Xie; Zhuo Xiao; Qi Li; Bo Zhu; Jingxian Chen; Huamu Chen; Fangyuan Yang; Yuting Chen; Qianwei Lai; Xuzhou Liu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-21

8.  Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog.

Authors:  S A Rodeo; S P Arnoczky; P A Torzilli; C Hidaka; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Survival of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and the contralateral ACL at a minimum of 15 years.

Authors:  Henry E Bourke; Lucy J Salmon; Alison Waller; Victoria Patterson; Leo A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Failure From a MOON Prospective Longitudinal Cohort.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Brian Aros; Angela Pedroza; Eric Pifel; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Warren R Dunn; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Rick W Wright; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  6 in total

1.  Poor Functional Outcome in Patients with Voluntary Knee Instability after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Munish Sood; Vikas Kulshrestha; Julie Sachdeva; Amresh Ghai; Ajaydeep Sud; Shalender Singh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-06-26

Review 2.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 50 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chong-Wei Tan; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Pei-An Yu; Chi-Lung Chen; Liang-Tseng Kuo; Ching-Chi Chi; Dokyung Kim; Geon Park
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction With a BTB Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew W DeFazio; Emily J Curry; Michael J Gustin; David C Sing; Hussein Abdul-Rassoul; Richard Ma; Freddie Fu; Xinning Li
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion": A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Anil Kapoor; Ashwani Soni; Sourabh Khatri; Gladson David Masih; Mukta Raghav
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:" A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Anil Kapoor; Ashwani Soni; Sourabh Khatri; Gladson David Masih; Mukta Raghav
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts in ACL reconstruction yield comparably good results in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hauke Horstmann; Maximilian Petri; Uwe Tegtbur; Gernot Felmet; Christian Krettek; Michael Jagodzinski
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.