Literature DB >> 16501976

Anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: does delay in index surgery affect outcome in recreational athletes.

A D Tambe1, S P Godsiff, S Mulay, M Joshi.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to see if delay in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affects post-reconstruction outcome in recreational athletes. Sixty-two recreational athletes who had arthroscopic ACL reconstructions using quadruple hamstring grafts between 1997 and 2000 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with less than 2 years' follow-up, those with multi-ligament injuries, reconstructions for previous failed repairs, those whose injury date was unknown, those with pre-injury Tegner activity level greater than 7 (competitive athletes) and those lost to follow-up were all excluded. Forty-six patients (38 males) were entered. The mean follow up was 38 months and the mean time from injury to index ACL reconstruction was 27 months. Apart from two revisions there were no other significant complications. Forty-one (89%) patients were evaluated in a review clinic. There was a significant improvement in the post-reconstruction Lysholm scores and an improvement in the Tegner scores. The Spearman's correlation coefficient between postoperative Lysholm score and the delay until surgery was -0.18 and the correlation coefficient between postoperative Tegner scores and the delay until surgery was 0.14. Thirty-five patients returned to sporting activity. Thirty-seven rated their knee as being normal or nearly normal and 35 said that their knee function was as they had expected it to be. Late ACL reconstruction does not adversely affect the outcome in recreational athletes. ACL reconstruction should be offered to these patients as there is a significant improvement in the knee function and patients are satisfied with the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501976      PMCID: PMC2532073          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0055-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Subacute versus delayed reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the competitive athlete.

Authors:  J Karlsson; J Kartus; L Magnusson; J Larsson; S Brandsson; B I Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Management of anterior cruciate ligament lesions: surgical fashion, personal whim or scientific evidence? Study of medium- and long-term results.

Authors:  P P Casteleyn
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.500

3.  Functional outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in recreational and competitive athletes.

Authors:  R Jerre; L Ejerhed; A Wallmon; J Kartus; S Brandsson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture--is sports activity a determining variable?

Authors:  C Fink; C Hoser; W Hackl; R A Navarro; K P Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 5.  Anterior cruciate ligament instability and reconstruction. Review of current trends in treatment.

Authors:  H Roos; J Karlsson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Early versus late reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Results after five years of followup.

Authors:  M Marcacci; S Zaffagnini; F Iacono; M P Neri; A Petitto
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Is an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome age dependent?

Authors:  F A Barber; B F Elrod; D A McGuire; L E Paulos
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  A comparison of outcomes at 2 to 6 years after acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  V K Goradia; W A Grana
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; G K Fitzgerald; A R Bartolozzi; M G Ciccotti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Timing of surgery in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; D V Patel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of instruments for measuring the burden of sport and active recreation injury.

Authors:  Nadine E Andrew; Belinda J Gabbe; Rory Wolfe; Peter A Cameron
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Low re-rupture rate with BPTB autograft and semitendinosus gracilis autograft with preserved insertions in ACL reconstruction surgery in sports persons.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Munish Sood; Anubhav Malhotra; Gladson David Masih; Anil Kapoor; Mukta Raghav; Mehar Dhillon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus allograft: intermediate-term outcome.

Authors:  S Chougule; G Tselentakis; Stefania Stefan; Georgeos Stefanakis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-14

4.  Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Deborah A Kowalchuk; Christopher D Harner; Freddie H Fu; James J Irrgang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.772

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.